Literature DB >> 34297199

Effect of carboplatin dose capping on survival in recurrent breast, ovary and head and neck cancers: a single institutional retrospective study.

Pritha Roy1, Satadru Biswas2, Santanu Acharyya1, Chandan Dasgupta1, Partha Dasgupta1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Carboplatin based regimens are an integral part of chemotherapy regimens for recurrent head and neck cancers (rHNC), triple negative breast cancers (rTNBC) and ovarian cancers (rOC). Dose reduction/capping of carboplatin remains a controversial aspect of such regimens in patients with moderate creatinine clearance (50 ml/min to 125 ml/min), especially in resource limited setting. The authors, therefore, looked into the magnitude of difference in outcome this makes in the above mentioned subsites.
METHODS: This single institutional retrospective study was performed with a total of 120 patients divided equally into Group A (patients receiving capped dose) and Group B (patients receiving uncapped dose). Further matching was performed with respect to age, sex, body surface area, weight, and primary malignancy subsite and baseline creatinine clearance. Patients in Group A had received 450 mg (for AUC 6 regimens) and 150 mg (for AUC 2 regimens) of carboplatin while patients in Group B received the actual calculated dose of carboplatin determined by the Calvert formula. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were the co-primary outcome measures.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 24 months, compared to Group A, Group B had a higher mPFS and mOS by 4 months (p < .001) and 5.5 months (p < .001), respectively. Statistically significant difference in outcome favouring Group B extends to all primary tumour subsites, with mPFS difference being 3.1 months (rHNC), 5.1 months (rTNBC) and 4.5 months (rOC) and mOS difference being 4.2 months (rHNC), 3 months (rTNBC) and 5.6 months (rOC). It was also found that capping had a statistically significant detriment in distal failure (p = .042) compared to locoregional failure (p = .842). A higher proportion of hematotoxicity was found in Group B, however, it was not statistically significant and well manageable.
CONCLUSIONS: Blatant dose capping of carboplatin should be avoided probably with more caution in patients with distant disease recurrence compared to their counterparts with locoregional failure.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carboplatin; Creatinine; Developing countries; Glomerular filtration rate; Triple negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34297199     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04323-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  9 in total

1.  Phase II trial of combination treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSPOR-HN02).

Authors:  M Tahara; N Kiyota; T Yokota; Y Hasegawa; K Muro; S Takahashi; T Onoe; A Homma; J Taguchi; M Suzuki; K Minato; K Yane; S Ueda; H Hara; K Saijo; T Yamanaka
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Advances in the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Lebert; R Lester; E Powell; M Seal; J McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Carboplatin dosing in ovarian cancer: problems and pitfalls.

Authors:  Ian M Collins; Rachel Roberts-Thomson; David Faulkner; Danny Rischin; Michael Friedlander; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Palliative treatment with carboplatin as late line therapy to patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Lena H Rosvig; Sven T Langkjer; Ann Knoop; Anders B Jensen
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 5.  Treatment of triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: toward individualized targeted treatments or chemosensitization?

Authors:  N Berrada; S Delaloge; F André
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 6.  Analysis of carboplatin dosing in patients with a glomerular filtration rate greater than 125 mL/min: To cap or not to cap? A retrospective analysis and review.

Authors:  Amy Morrow; Campbell Garland; Fei Yang; Mike De Luna; Jon D Herrington
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 7.  Carboplatin: a clinical review.

Authors:  C H Yarbro
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.315

8.  Bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer: a critical consideration.

Authors:  Sara Giovannoni; Patrizia Trenta
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  How I treat metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Caparica; Matteo Lambertini; Evandro de Azambuja
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2019-05-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.