| Literature DB >> 34296043 |
M V Mkwanazi1, S Z Ndlela1, M Chimonyo1.
Abstract
The review collates the documented use of IK used in goats for controlling ticks and records the bioactivity testing that has been carried out on these plants. A literature survey was conducted on the use of IK whereby ethno-veterinary medicine (EVM) is used as well as on the investigations relating to the potential efficacy of the used plants. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), ticks rank the first amongst the ectoparasites that limit goat productivity. Infrequent and overuse of acaricides have resulted in the development of resistance in ticks as well as environmental impacts. To combat these impacts, contribution of IK needs to be appreciated. In total 21, ethno-veterinary plant species, belonging to 16 families were identified to control ticks. These included plants such as Lippia javanica (Burm.f.) Spreng, Cissus quadrangularis .L, and Aloe ferox Mill, Grandifolia Warb, Terminalia brownii Fresen and Aloe volkensii Engl. Efficacy of plant species such as Pelargonium reniforme Curtis and Eucomis punctata L'Hér is enhanced by mixing them with substances like potassium permanganate and river salt to enhance the effectiveness of the extract. Ethno-veterinary plants have a wide range of phytochemicals, which include alkaloids, tannins, flavonoids, anti-microbial and pesticidal effects that produces tick repellent effects. The most common plant parts used during preparations are roots, leaves, barks, fruits and young shoots and to a lesser extent flowers, although the use of leaves usually takes precedence. Non-plant materials involve the use of methods such as traditional practices where ticks are manually removed. using hand picking. Oral administration and direct application on the infested site are used. It is, thus important to conduct more work on the conservation of ethnoveterinary plants, IK information gathering and dissemination.Entities:
Keywords: Ethno veterinary remedies; Sustainability; Traditional practices
Year: 2021 PMID: 34296043 PMCID: PMC8281653 DOI: 10.1016/j.vas.2021.100190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Anim Sci ISSN: 2451-943X
Fig. 1Flow diagram of the screening process of the literature.
Proximate composition of chevon from Boer, Savanna and Angora goats.
| Boer goat | 694 | 228 | 105 | 9.5 |
| Savanna goat | 698 | 243 | 79 | 9.7 |
| Angora goat | 642 | 291 | 44 | 10 |
Ethnoveterinary plants used to control ticks in Africa.
| Scientific name | Family | Plant part | Preparation methods, administration and dosage levels | Comments & precautions | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asphodelaceae | Leaves | Leaves are crushed, and the juice is applied to the skin | – | ||
| Fabaceae | Roots | Grind the roots and boil in water for 30 min until the water turns red, spray the animal | – | ||
| Apocynaceae | Leaves | Grind leaves, boil, cool and drench the animals. Dose with 1 L bottle of adults and 300 ml bottle for kids | – | ||
| Asphodelaceae | Leaves | Grind leaves, boil and apply to skin or drench with 1L | – | ||
| Asteraceae | Whole plant | Crush and mix with water | Safe to use | ||
| Combretaceae | Leaves | Crush and mix with water, spray the animal | Very effective | ||
| Papilionaceae | Barks | Crush stems and spread on infested sites | Very effective | ||
| Araceae | Stem | Crush mix with water and drench the animal | Very effective | ||
| Papilionoideae | Barks, branches | Mix with water | Safe to use | ||
| Euphorbiaceae | Leaves | Grind leaves and paste on tick infested site | Very effective | ||
| Solanaceae | Fruits | Crush fruits and mix with water | Handle with care | ||
| Fabaceae | Leaves | Crush leaves mix with water and spray | Effective | ||
| Fabaceae | Leaves | Crush leaves, mix with water | Safe to use | ||
| Vitaceae | Stems | Crush and mix with water to spray | Handle with care, causes itching | ||
| Solanaceae | Fruits | Crush the fruits and mix with soot in water and spray | Causes eye irritation | ||
| Alliaceae | Roots | Crush and mix with water | Very effective | ||
| Lamiaceae | Leaves | Macerate, soak with water and spray | Very effective and safe to use | ||
| Fabaceae | Branches and twigs | Burn and apply ashes on animal skin | Safe to use | ||
| Spurges | Herbs | The sap is extracted from the fresh plant and smeared in the infested site | – | ||
| Asteraceae | Shrub | Leaves are crushed and put in water and decanted, spray directly on infested areas of the body | – | ||
| Bignonias | Bark and fruit | The fruit or bark of the plants are pounded using a mortar and the pounded powder is added to water and sprayed on affected areas | – | ||
| Compositae/ | Leaves | Animal made to drink crushed leaves, soot and water mixture | Very effective | ||
| Verbenaceae | Leaves, twigs | Leaves, twigs and whole plant are crushed and mixed with water and sprayed to the infested site. | Safe to use |
Mortality (%) of adult Amblyomma cohaerens and Amblyomma variegatum treated with different plant preparations.
| 72 | No ticks | |
| 6 | No ticks | |
| 68 | 100 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| Control | 0 | 0 |
| Participatory rural appraisal | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Participatory rural appraisal | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Review | Y | Y | Y | CT | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Review | Y | Y | Y | CT | CT | Y | CT | M | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Getaneh et al. (2016) | Review | Y | Y | Y | CT | Y | Y | Y | M |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Report and opinion | Y | Y | Y | CT | Y | Y | Y | M | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Review | Y | Y | CT | CT | Y | Y | CT | W | |
| Book chapter | Y | Y | Y | CT | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Interviews | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Review | Y | Y | Y | CT | Y | Y | Y | M | |
| Gakuubi and Wanzala (2012) | Participatory rural appraisal | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Participatory rural appraisal | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| 2008 | |||||||||
| Mc Gaw and Eloff (2008) | Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H |
| Structured survey and Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Case study, Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | CT | CT | Y | CT | W | |
| Report and opinion | Y | Y | Y | CT | CT | Y | Y | M | |
| Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Book chapter | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Participatory rural appraisal | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Structured questionnaire | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Experimental | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H | |
| Review | Y | Y | Y | CT | YY | Y | Y | H | |
| Technical note | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | H |