| Literature DB >> 34295839 |
Yi Liu1, Zhengrong Wang2, Wanlong Huang3, Shuai Pang3, Lingxiao Qian2, Yanyan Zhang2, Jimeng Meng2, Mengfei Xu2, Weiyi Wang2, Yunfei Wang2, Baoyan Lu2, Yiyue Zhao2, Jinwen Xian2, Xinwen Bo2, Bisong Yue1.
Abstract
Moniezia expansa (M. expansa) parasitizes the small intestine of sheep and causes inhibited growth and development or even death. Being globally distributed, it causes considerable economic losses to the animal husbandry industry. Here, using Illumina, PacBio and BioNano techniques, we obtain a high-quality genome assembly of M. expansa, which has a total length of 142 Mb, a scaffold N50 length of 7.27 Mb and 8,104 coding genes. M. expansa has a very high body fat content and a specific type of fatty acid metabolism. It cannot synthesize any lipids due to the loss of some key genes involved in fatty acid synthesis, and it may can metabolize most lipids via the relatively complete fatty acid β-oxidation pathway. The M. expansa genome encodes multiple lipid transporters and lipid binding proteins that enable the utilization of lipids in the host intestinal fluid. Although many of its systems are degraded (with the loss of homeobox genes), its reproductive system is well developed. PL10, AGO, Nanos and Pumilio compose a reproductive stem cell regulatory network. The results suggest that the high body lipid content of M. expansa provides an energy source supporting the high fecundity of this parasite. Our study provides insight into host interaction, adaptation, nutrient acquisition, strobilization, and reproduction in this parasite and this is also the first genome published in Anoplocephalidae.Entities:
Keywords: Moniezia expansa; genome; lipid; parasitology; reproduction; worms
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295839 PMCID: PMC8291045 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.693914
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
The genomic features of 32 species published in platyhelminthes.
| Species Name | Clade | N50 | Genome Size | Coding genes | GC | CEGMA | BUSCO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Trematoda | 415,842 | 547M | 13,634 | 44% | 71.80% | 70% |
|
| Trematoda | 26,853 | 834M | 18,607 | — | 52.42% | 44.50% |
|
| Trematoda | 1,901,411 | 1203M | 9,708 | 44.10% | 47.98% | 65.50% |
|
| Trematoda | 1,347,703 | 620M | 16,356 | 43.80% | 73.79% | 72.70% |
|
| Trematoda | 13,843 | 344M | 23,546 | 34.20% | 63.71% | 47.30% |
|
| Trematoda | 317,285 | 375M | 11,140 | 34.20% | 73.39% | 65.30% |
|
| Trematoda | 174,764 | 402M | 12,738 | 34.10% | 69.76% | 53.30% |
|
| Trematoda | 50,458,499 | 409M | 10,144 | 35.50% | 77.02% | 74.70% |
|
| Trematoda | 35,167 | 367M | 26,189 | 34.30% | 74.60% | 60% |
|
| Trematoda | 12,268 | 340M | 22,997 | 34.10% | 61.69% | 44.60% |
|
| Trematoda | 18,635 | 343M | 24,089 | 34.40% | 60.89% | 42.50% |
|
| Trematoda | 7,673 | 701M | 22,185 | — | 52.82% | 26.90% |
|
| Cestoda | 6,726 | 531M | 19,966 | — | 49.60% | 30% |
|
| Cestoda | 74,230 | 115M | 11,432 | — | 92.74% | 70.30% |
|
| Cestoda | 5,228,736 | 114M | 10,245 | 41.90% | 93.15% | 69.60% |
|
| Cestoda | 13,762,452 | 114M | 10,663 | 42.20% | 93.55% | 70.20% |
|
| Cestoda | 12,412 | 103M | 11,649 | 43% | 84.68% | 60.10% |
|
| Cestoda | 49,752 | 165M | 11,271 | 35.20% | 88.71% | 70.70% |
|
| Cestoda | 7,673,820 | 168M | 10,139 | 36% | 91.94% | 73.10% |
|
| Cestoda | 19,213 | 162M | 13,777 | 36.70% | 87.10% | 68.90% |
| M.expansa | Cestoda | 7,274,224 | 142 M | 8,104 | 38.82% | 89.52% | 62% |
|
| Cestoda | 65,816 | 117M | 10,614 | 41.80% | 91.53% | 68.10% |
|
| Cestoda | 31,505 | 539M | 20,228 | 43% | 76.61% | 62.30% |
|
| Cestoda | 4,624 | 1258M | 39,557 | — | 29.44% | 23% |
|
| Cestoda | 342,420 | 168M | 13,322 | 43.10% | 92.74% | 69.50% |
|
| Cestoda | 44,815,576 | 240M | 12,890 | 43.80% | 87.90% | 67.20% |
|
| Cestoda | 585,232 | 169M | 13,161 | 43.20% | 93.15% | 70.50% |
|
| Cestoda | 67,829 | 122M | 12,481 | 42.90% | 93.15% | 69% |
|
| Monogenea | 18,344 | 67M | 15,436 | 33.90% | 89.52% | 66.30% |
|
| Monogenea | 2,893 | 617M | 37,906 | — | 39.52% | 20.50% |
|
| Rhabditophora | 244,885 | 764M | 49,013 | 45.90% | 99.19% | 88.20% |
|
| Rhabditophora | 40,740 | 901M | 29,850 | 29.90% | 91.13% | 70.60% |
Figure 1Phylogenetic tree and the distribution of genes in different species. Numbers in the branches are estimates of divergence time.
Figure 2Lipid metabolic pathways in M. expansa. Black solid lines indicate direct chemical reactions, whereas red dashed arrows indicate that chemical reactions cannot be completed.
The numbers of reproductive stem cell marker genes identified in each species.
| Species | Nanos | Argonaute | Royal family | RNase III | DEADbox | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nanos | Pumilio | AGO | Piwi | Group4 | CHROMO | MBT | PWWP | Tudor | Dicer | Drosha | Vasa | PL10 | ||
|
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
|
| 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 2 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 15 | 31 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| 6 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 45 | 11 | 33 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 26 | 9 | 21 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 25 | 8 | 18 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 8 | 22 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Figure 3Fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence of M. expansa PL10 (10X). (A1-B3), in situ hybridization results for PL10. (A1, B1) are images after rhodamine- labeled probe hybridization (red); (A2, B2) are images after DAPI stains the nucleus; and (A3, B3) are merged images. (C1-E3), Immunofluorescence results for PL10. (C1, D1, E1) are images after FITC labeled goat anti-rabbit antibody binding (green); (C2, D2, E2) are images after DAPI staining; (C3, D3, E3) are merged images. (a), Cirrus pouch; (b), Vitelline gland; (c), Testis; (d), Eggs; (e), Intersegmental gland.
Homeobox genes of M. expansa.
| Classes | Genes in Families | Classes | Genes in Families | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANTP |
| evm.model.Contig71.147 | PRD |
| evm.model.Contig69.688.1 |
|
| evm.model.Contig2.37 |
| evm.model.Contig2.52 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig2.207 |
| evm.model.Contig71.48 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig61.128 | evm.model.Contig75.347 | |||
|
| evm.model.Contig62.24 |
| evm.model.Contig96.3 | ||
| evm.model.Contig2.208 |
| evm.model.Contig71.1164 | |||
| evm.model.Contig71.148 | LIM |
| evm.model.Contig82.248 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig2.140 | POU |
| evm.model.Contig70.15 | |
|
| evm.model.Contig51.546 |
| evm.model.Contig82.3 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig82.133 |
| evm.model.Contig71.1317 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig82.336 | TALE |
| evm.model.Contig52.180 | |
| evm.model.Contig71.1090 | evm.model.Contig51.91 | ||||
|
| evm.model.Contig71.664 | evm.model.Contig61.159 | |||
|
| evm.model.Contig70.175 |
| evm.model.Contig51.360 | ||
|
| evm.model.Contig92.125 | ZF |
| evm.model.Contig61.106 | |
|
| evm.model.Contig52.232 | Other | Unassigned | evm.model.Contig61.160 | |
This table includes all the homeodomain containing gene models found in M. expansa genomes. Gene models containing a homeodomain that could not be confidently placed in any known Class are given the category “Other”.