| Literature DB >> 34295784 |
Hua Li1, Qing-Ke Cui1, Zhan Li1, Jie Li1, Feifei Li2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrent respiratory tract infection (RRTI) is common disease in childhood, and the incidence rate is increasing in China. The cause is complex, which is related to the physiological characteristics of children's respiratory system and the immature immune function, lack of trace elements and environmental pollution. Immunomodulators and antibiotics are often used to treat RRTI, but the clinical efficacy still needs to be improved. Chinese medicine has unique advantages in the treatment of RRTI. In the clinical treatment of RRTI, the authors often use modified Ginseng-Schisandra decoction (MGSD). In order to study the clinical effect of MGSD on serum trace elements and immune function in children with spleen deficiency syndrome after RRTI, we conducted this clinical observation.Entities:
Keywords: Recurrent respiratory tract infection (RRTI); clinical efficacy; modified Ginseng-Schisandra decoction (MGSD); spleen deficiency syndrome
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295784 PMCID: PMC8261592 DOI: 10.21037/tp-21-243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Pediatr ISSN: 2224-4336
Figure 1Participant flow diagram. RRTI, recurrent respiratory tract infection.
Demographic of patients
| Group | Gender (n) | Age (mean ± SD) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||
| Control group | 28 | 12 | 6.83±2.26 |
| Observation group | 23 | 17 | 6.50±2.81 |
| P | >0.05 | >0.05 | |
Comparison of clinical efficacy/cases
| Group | No. of cases | Clinical recovery | Significantly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | 15 | 16 | 7 | 2 | 95.0 |
| Control | 40 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 65.0 |
Compared with before treatment, P<0.05.
Comparison of TCM syndrome scores before and after treatment
| Group | No. of cases | Before treatment | After treatment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Observation | 40 | 15.85±2.50a,b | 3.00±2.60a,b |
| Control | 40 | 16.30±3.22a | 7.25±2.01a |
aCompared with before treatment, P<0.05; bCompared with the control group after treatment, P<0.05.
Comparison of changes in serum immunoglobulin and T lymphocyte subsets
| Group | Time | IgA (g·L-1) | IgG (g·L-1) | IgM (g·L-1) | CD3+/% | CD4+/% | CD4+/CD8+/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation (n=40) | Before treatment | 1.07±0.06 | 6.71±1.20 | 1.19±0.13 | 52.13±1.32 | 31.34±2.18 | 1.52±0.95 |
| After treatment | 2.71±0.25a,b | 10.81±1.45a,b | 1.56±0.39a | 63.29±1.34a,b | 42.28±2.53a,b | 1.77±0.60a,b | |
| Control (n=40) | Before treatment | 1.06±0.11 | 6.62±1.19 | 1.16±0.24 | 52.06±1.13 | 30.38±2.19 | 1.50±0.34 |
| After treatment | 1.38±0.24a | 7.95±1.25a | 1.54±0.43a | 57.12±1.21a | 35.19±2.34a | 1.53±0.39 |
aCompared with before treatment, P<0.05; bCompared with after treatment, P<0.05.
Comparison of changes in trace element index values (µmol·L-1)
| Group | Time | Fe | Zn | Mg | Ca | Pb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation (n=40) | Before treatment | 7.96±0.51 | 64.78±0.41 | 1.48±0.12 | 1.51±0.19 | 40.59±15.76 |
| After treatment | 8.99±0.68a,b | 79.13±0.56a,b | 1.56±0.14 | 1.75±0.29a | 18.68±13.45a,b | |
| Control (n=40) | Before treatment | 8.04±0.60 | 64.05±0.68 | 1.51±0.10 | 1.56±0.09 | 36.24±14.80 |
| After treatment | 8.15±0.43a | 68.51±0.29a | 1.51±0.10 | 1.60±0.10a | 26.55±14.50a |
aCompared with before treatment, P<0.05; bCompared with the control group after treatment, P<0.05.