Literature DB >> 34295453

Machine learning to improve breast cancer diagnosis by multimodal ultrasound.

Laith R Sultan1, Susan M Schultz1, Theodore W Cary1, Chandra M Sehgal1.   

Abstract

Despite major advances in breast cancer imaging there is compelling need to reduce unnecessary biopsies by improving characterization of breast lesions. This study demonstrates the use of machine learning to enhance breast cancer diagnosis with multimodal ultrasound. Surgically proven solid breast lesions were studied using quantitative features extracted from grayscale and Doppler ultrasound images. Statistically different features from the logistic regression classifier were used train and test lesion differentiation by leave-one-out cross-validation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the grayscale morphologic features was 0.85 (sensitivity = 87, specificity = 69). The diagnostic performance improved (AUC = 0.89, sensitivity = 79, specificity = 89) when Doppler features were added to the analysis. Reliability of the individual training cycles of leave-one-out cross-validation was tested by measuring dispersion from the mean model. Significant dispersion from the mean, representing weak learning, was observed in 11.3% of cases. Pruning the high-dispersion cases improved the diagnostic performance markedly (AUC 0.96, sensitivity = 92, specificity = 95). These results demonstrate the effectiveness of dispersion to identify weakly learned cases. In conclusion, machine learning with multimodal ultrasound including grayscale and Doppler can achieve high performance for breast cancer diagnosis, comparable to that of human observers. Identifying weakly learned cases can markedly enhance diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; computer-aided diagnosis; machine learning; radiomics; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 34295453      PMCID: PMC8293293          DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2018.8579953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp        ISSN: 1948-5719


  8 in total

1.  Quantitative vascularity of breast masses by Doppler imaging: regional variations and diagnostic implications.

Authors:  C M Sehgal; P H Arger; S E Rowling; E F Conant; C Reynolds; J A Patton
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  SRBF: Speckle reducing bilateral filtering.

Authors:  Simone Balocco; Carlo Gatta; Oriol Pujol; Josepa Mauri; Petia Radeva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Going beyond a First Reader: A Machine Learning Methodology for Optimizing Cost and Performance in Breast Ultrasound Diagnosis.

Authors:  Santosh S Venkatesh; Benjamin J Levenback; Laith R Sultan; Ghizlane Bouzghar; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-06       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Bayesian probability of malignancy with BI-RADS sonographic features.

Authors:  Ghizlane Bouzghar; Benjamin J Levenback; Laith R Sultan; Santosh S Venkatesh; Alyssa Cwanger; Emily F Conant; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Digital image enhancement and noise filtering by use of local statistics.

Authors:  J S Lee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 6.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Computer-based margin analysis of breast sonography for differentiating malignant and benign masses.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Theodore W Cary; Sarah A Kangas; Susan P Weinstein; Susan M Schultz; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  The use of colour-coded and spectral Doppler ultrasound in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Authors:  C Peters-Engl; M Medl; S Leodolter
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Electromechanical Wave Imaging With Machine Learning for Automated Isochrone Generation.

Authors:  Lea Melki; Melina Tourni; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.037

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.