| Literature DB >> 34295369 |
Xiao-Han Song1,2,3, Jorge Assis4, Jie Zhang1,2, Xu Gao5, Han-Gil Gao5, De-Lin Duan1,2, Ester A Serrão4, Zi-Min Hu1,6.
Abstract
Glaciation-induced environmental changes during the last glacial maximum (LGM) have strongly influenced species' distributions and genetic diversity patterns in the northern high latitudes. However, these effects have seldom been assessed on sessile species in the Northwest Pacific. Herein, we chose the brown alga Sargassum thunbergii to test this hypothesis, by comparing present population genetic variability with inferred geographical range shifts from the LGM to the present, estimated with species distribution modelling (SDM). Projections for contrasting scenarios of future climate change were also developed to anticipate genetic diversity losses at regional scales. Results showed that S. thunbergii harbours strikingly rich genetic diversity and multiple divergent lineages in the centre-northern range of its distribution, in contrast with a poorer genetically distinct lineage in the southern range. SDM hindcasted refugial persistence in the southern range during the LGM as well as post-LGM expansion of 18 degrees of latitude northward. Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) analysis further suggested that the multiple divergent lineages in the centre-northern range limit stem from post-LGM colonization from the southern survived lineage. This suggests divergence due to demographic bottlenecks during range expansion and massive genetic diversity loss during post-LGM contraction in the south. The projected future range of S. thunbergii highlights the threat to unique gene pools that might be lost under global changes.Entities:
Keywords: Sargassum thunbergii; climate change; genetic diversity; glacial persistence; niche modelling; range shifts
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295369 PMCID: PMC8288013 DOI: 10.1111/eva.13247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
FIGURE 1(a) Map of the study area including the latitudinal range limits of Sargassum thunbergii. (a–c) Colours depict the genetic subdivision based on structure for the two‐uppermost levels of subdivisions over space (k = 2 and k = 7). Population numbers (1–35) on the map and plot structure are the same as in Table 1
Sites, coordinates and population sizes of Sthunbergii thunbergii analysed in this study, and standardized allelic richness (), standardized private diversity () and gene diversity (H e) inferred from microsatellites
| Sampling site | Water body | Coordinates |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Shakotan, Hokkaido, Japan | Sea of Japan | 43.36°N, 140.46°E | 6 | 2.60 ± 0.07 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.39 |
| 2. Muroran, Hokkaido, Japan | Sea of Japan | 42.32°N, 140.97°E | 10 | 2.22 ± 0.07 | 1.22 ± 0.41 | 0.38 |
| 3. Esashi, Hokkaido, Japan | Sea of Japan | 41.86°N, 140.18°E | 25 | 3.41 ± 0.17 | 2.16 ± 0.68 | 0.52 |
| 4. Yazishi, Liaoning, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 39.04°N, 122.72°E | 25 | 2.60 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.06 | 0.41 |
| 5. Dongbang, Liaoning, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 39.02°N, 122.75°E | 25 | 2.96 ± 0.26 | 0.83 ± 0.76 | 0.37 |
| 6. Yingzuishi, Liaoning, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 39.01°N, 122.73°E | 25 | 3.09 ± 0.13 | 1.42 ± 0.82 | 0.47 |
| 7. Lvshun, Liaoning, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 38.72°N, 121.15°E | 24 | 2.83 ± 0.11 | 1.14 ± 0.57 | 0.39 |
| 8. Onagawa Bay, Miyagi, Japan | Japan‐Pacific coast | 38.44°N, 141.48°E | 18 | 2.88 ± 0.08 | 0.83 ± 0.38 | 0.30 |
| 9. Beihuangcheng Island, Yantai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 38.38°N, 120.90°E | 25 | 2.46 ± 0.07 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.39 |
| 10. Daqin Island, Yantai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 38.30°N, 120.83°E | 25 | 2.81 ± 0.17 | 0.61 ± 0.56 | 0.39 |
| 11. Sokcho, Gangwon‐do, Korea | Sea of Japan | 38.20°N, 128.59°E | 14 | 2.08 ± 0.12 | 0.02 ± 0.14 | 0.28 |
| 12. Changdao Island, Yantai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.97°N, 120.73°E | 25 | 2.59 ± 0.11 | 0.23 ± 0.42 | 0.35 |
| 13. Jiming Island, Weihai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.75°N, 122.80°E | 25 | 3.00 ± 0.13 | 0.66 ± 0.52 | 0.49 |
| 14. Xiaoshi Island, Weihai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.52°N, 122.01°E | 24 | 2.10 ± 0.08 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.32 |
| 15. Yueliang Bay, Weihai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.51°N, 122.43°E | 25 | 2.55 ± 0.09 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.34 |
| 16. Chengshantou, Weihai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.39°N, 122.71°E | 25 | 2.63 ± 0.14 | 0.68 ± 0.59 | 0.40 |
| 17. Yantai University, Yantai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.47°N, 121.46°E | 25 | 2.33 ± 0.11 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.24 |
| 18. Ailian Bay, Weihai, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 37.23°N, 122.59°E | 25 | 2.65 ± 0.18 | 0.61 ± 0.49 | 0.43 |
| 19. Gauido, Chungcheongnam‐do, Korea | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 36.67°N, 126.07°E | 6 | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 0.93 ± 0.25 | 0.32 |
| 20. Taean, Chungcheongnam‐do, Korea | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 36.66°N, 126.26°E | 10 | 2.47 ± 0.09 | 0.37 ± 0.50 | 0.39 |
| 21. Badaguan, Qingdao, China | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 36.05°N, 120.35°E | 25 | 2.57 ± 0.19 | 1.19 ± 1.00 | 0.34 |
| 22. Ama, Shimane, Japan | Sea of Japan | 36.01°N, 132.58°E | 11 | 3.40 ± 0.25 | 3.52 ± 0.87 | 0.52 |
| 23. Tateyama Bay, Chiba, Japan | Japan‐Pacific coast | 35.00°N, 139.83°E | 22 | 1.38 ± 0.09 | 0.87 ± 0.78 | 0.06 |
| 24. Chita, Aichi, Japan | Japan‐Pacific coast | 34.71°N, 136.92°E | 15 | 1.82 ± 0.00 | 2.61 ± 0.65 | 0.14 |
| 25. Yeongsan, Jeollanam‐do, Korea | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 34.65°N, 125.47°E | 10 | 1.80 ± 0.21 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.17 |
| 26. Jodo, Jeollanam‐do, Korea | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 34.32°N, 126.04°E | 10 | 2.18 ± 0.12 | 0.98 ± 0.60 | 0.29 |
| 27. Jeju Island, Jejudo, Korea | Yellow‐Bohai Sea | 33.28°N, 126.32°E | 10 | 2.49 ± 0.29 | 1.33 ± 0.73 | 0.46 |
| 28. Shengsi, Zhoushan, China | East China Sea | 30.71°N, 122.77°E | 25 | 2.13 ± 0.45 | 0.02 ± 0.13 | 0.21 |
| 29. Dongtou, Wenzhou, China | East China Sea | 27.80°N, 121.14°E | 25 | 2.67 ± 0.14 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.41 |
| 30. Longchuanjiao, Wenzhou, China | East China Sea | 27.45°N, 121.05°E | 25 | 2.55 ± 0.38 | 0.64 ± 0.53 | 0.30 |
| 31. Sanpanwei, Wenzhou, China | East China Sea | 27.48°N, 121.05°E | 25 | 1.88 ± 0.09 | 0.33 ± 0.47 | 0.26 |
| 32. Zhuyu Island, Wenzhou, China | East China Sea | 27.46°N, 121.10°E | 25 | 2.02 ± 0.18 | 1.22 ± 0.71 | 0.28 |
| 33. Huangqi, Liangjiang, Fuzhou, China | East China Sea | 26.41°N, 119.92°E | 24 | 2.21 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.64 | 0.25 |
| 34. Nanri Island, Putian, China | East China Sea | 25.26°N, 119.67°E | 29 | 1.97 ± 0.08 | 0.51 ± 0.50 | 0.27 |
| 35. Meizhou Island, Putian, China | East China Sea | 25.07°N, 119.13°E | 24 | 1.82 ± 0.07 | 1.86 ± 0.35 | 0.20 |
FIGURE 2(a) Genetic differentiation inferred by factorial correspondence analysis (FCA) of population multiscores. Standardized allelic richness and private diversity (number of unique alleles) for the first (b) and second (c) hierarchical level of genetic subdivisions. Colours refer to the same assignment of genetic clusters in Figure 1. Asterisks refer to significant higher levels of diversity. (d) The genetic differentiation matrix of average F ST and Jost's D between 7 subdivided clusters
Performance (i.e. accuracy scores) of boosted regression trees considering within‐taxon niche structure (northern and southern genetic groups, as well as the ensemble of both models)
| Grouping | Cross‐validation | Final prediction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUC | Sensitivity | AUC | Sensitivity | |
| Northern group | 0.8740 ± 0.1199 | 0.8333 ± 0.2582 | 0.9759615 | 1 |
| Southern group | 0.9375 ± 0.1046 | 0.8333 ± 0.4082 | 0.9354167 | 0.9375 |
| Ensemble | ‐ | ‐ | 0.9722317 | 0.9736842 |
FIGURE 3Ensemble distribution maps of Sargassum thunbergii for the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (a), the mid‐Holocene (MH) (b), the present (c) and the future (2090–2100) (d and e), and major oceanographic currents during the LGM and present‐day conditions (f) (drawn after Hu et al., 2011). The future distribution considered contrasting scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions of RCP26 (d) and RCP85 (e). Predictions were performed with the ensemble of models considering genetic structure. Light blue polygons depict seasonal sea ice and grey polygons depict land area