Literature DB >> 34295187

Evaluation of Anthropometric Indices for Screening Hypertension Among Employees of Mizan Tepi University, Southwestern Ethiopia.

Rahel Dereje1,2, Kalkidan Hassen1, Getu Gizaw1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, hypertension is becoming a serious problem affecting the health and wellbeing of the adult population. Anthropometric indices like body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) have long been utilized to screen hypertension; in contrast, other evidence indicates the superior utility of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) to screen hypertension. There are inconclusive results from different studies done in different settings regarding the best screening index for hypertension. In addition, there is a paucity of information on the evaluation of anthropometric indices for screening hypertension in the study area. Therefore, this study evaluates the utility of anthropometric indices for screening hypertension among Mizan Tepi University employees, southwestern Ethiopia.
METHODS: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted among Mizan Tepi University employees. A gender-based stratified simple random sampling technique was used to select 585 employees. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the association between anthropometric indices and hypertension. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was employed to evaluate anthropometric indices for screening hypertension, and optimal cutoff points were also developed based on Youden index (sensitivity + specificity - 1) and presented with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of hypertension was 20.9%, which was 22.5% in males and 18.7% in females. Among males, WHtR, WHR, and BMI were significantly associated with hypertension, while, in females, only BMI was associated with hypertension. WHtR had a higher screening ability for hypertension followed by WC in both sexes. For males, the cutoff point for WHR, WC, BMI, and WHtR for screening hypertension was 0.897, 85.17cm, 24.6kg/m2, and 0.51, respectively. In females, the cutoff point developed for screening hypertension for WHR, WC, BMI, and WHtR were 0.92, 85.67cm, 24.8kg/m2, and 0.52, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The waist-to-height ratio was found to be the best obesity index to screen hypertension than BMI, WC, and WHR. The finding supports the use of WHtR for screening hypertension in resource-limited settings.
© 2021 Dereje et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; WC; WHR; WHtR; obesity

Year:  2021        PMID: 34295187      PMCID: PMC8291801          DOI: 10.2147/IBPC.S317018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control        ISSN: 1178-7104


  50 in total

1.  The predictive value of different measures of obesity for incident cardiovascular events and mortality.

Authors:  Harald J Schneider; Nele Friedrich; Jens Klotsche; Lars Pieper; Matthias Nauck; Ulrich John; Marcus Dörr; Stephan Felix; Hendrik Lehnert; David Pittrow; Sigmund Silber; Henry Völzke; Günter K Stalla; Henri Wallaschofski; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Measures of adiposity and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Andy Menke; Paul Muntner; Rachel P Wildman; Kristi Reynolds; Jiang He
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Comparative evaluation of anthropometric measures to predict cardiovascular risk factors in Tehranian adult women.

Authors:  Ahmad Esmaillzadeh; Parvin Mirmiran; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Burden of undiagnosed hypertension in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feven Ataklte; Sebhat Erqou; Stephen Kaptoge; Betiglu Taye; Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Andre P Kengne
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 5.  Fat depots, free fatty acids, and dyslipidemia.

Authors:  Jon O Ebbert; Michael D Jensen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  A proposal for a primary screening tool: 'Keep your waist circumference to less than half your height'.

Authors:  Margaret Ashwell; Sigrid Gibson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Waist-to-height ratio is the best anthropometric predictor of hypertension: A population-based study with women from a state of northeast of Brazil.

Authors:  Tainá C S Caminha; Haroldo S Ferreira; Narithania S Costa; Ricardo P Nakano; Renata Elyonara S Carvalho; Antônio F S Xavier; Monica L Assunção
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Waist-to-height ratio is better than body mass index and waist circumference as a screening criterion for metabolic syndrome in Han Chinese adults.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Zhong Xin; Jian-Ping Feng; Jin-Kui Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Association of a New Measure of Obesity with Hypertension and Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Wankyo Chung; Chun Gun Park; Ohk-Hyun Ryu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnostic performance of waist-to-height ratio in identifying cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome among adult Saudis. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rasmieh Alzeidan; Amel Fayed; Fatemeh Rabiee; Ahmad Hersi; Hala Elmorshedy
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  2 in total

1.  Burden of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors among adult populations in Wolaita Sodo Town, Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tadele Lankrew Ayalew; Belete Gelaw Wale; Bitew Tefera Zewudie
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.174

2.  Mid upper arm circumference as screening tool of overweight or obesity among adult employees of Mizan Tepi University, Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Rahel Dereje; Abel Girma; Abebaw Molla; Asnake Simieneh
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.