Literature DB >> 34295168

Prevalence and Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prospective Cohort Study.

Korinan Fanta1, Fekede Bekele Daba1, Elsah Tegene Asefa2, Legese Chelkeba3, Tsegaye Melaku1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing burden of metabolic syndrome (MS) and ischemic heart disease in sub-Saharan Africa, data on the prevalence of MS among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from the regions are limited. Hence, this study is aimed to evaluate the prevalence and impact of MS on 30-day all-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with ACS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively assessed 176 ACS patients, who were admitted to two tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. MS was diagnosed based on a harmonized definition of MS. In-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 30-day mortality were recorded. Multivariable cox-regression was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Among 176 ACS patients enrolled, 62 (35.2%) had MS. Majority of the patients (62.5%) were male with the mean age of 56±11.9 years. ACS patients with MS were older, presented with atypical symptoms, and they had history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and coronary artery disease compared to those without MS. MS was also significantly associated with in-hospital MACE (30.6% vs 17.5%; p= 0.046) and 30-day mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 3.25, 95% CI=1.72-6.15]. The other significant predictors of 30-day mortality were pre-hospital delay >12h (HR= 4.32, 95% CI=1.68-11.100), killip class ≥2 (HR=10.7, 95% CI= 2.54-44.95), and ejection fraction <40 (HR= 2.59 95% CI=1.39-4.84).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MS among patients with ACS in Ethiopia is high. MS was significantly associated with high in-hospital MACE and it was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Initiating appropriate strategies on MS prevention and timely diagnosis of MS components could decrease the burden of ACS and improve patient's outcome.
© 2021 Fanta et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metabolic syndrome; mortality; myocardial infarction; sub-Saharan Africa

Year:  2021        PMID: 34295168      PMCID: PMC8290164          DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S320203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes        ISSN: 1178-7007            Impact factor:   3.168


Introduction

The metabolic syndrome (MS) represents a group of correlated metabolic disorders that have a synergic effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk.1,2 According to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP/ATP III), MS is defined by the presence of any three of the following metabolic abnormalities: abdominal obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension or treated hypertension, and elevated fasting plasma glucose levels.3 About one-quarter of the world population is currently affected by MS.4 Contrary to the prior thought, MS are no longer rare in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Recent meta-analysis of a community-based study reported that the overall prevalence of MS in SSA was 17.1% and 18% according to the NCEP/ATP III and international diabetes federation (IDF) diagnostic criteria, respectively.5 Furthermore, the burden of non-communicable disease in SSA regions is exceeding the global average.6 Historically, rheumatic heart disease from infections source has been the leading cause of cardiovascular disease, while other causes were comparatively rare.6,7 However, recent studies show that stroke and ischemic heart disease are the leading cause of cardiovascular disease burden in the regions.5,6,8 These findings reflect that MS, a common precursor of these cardiovascular diseases is common in the continent. However, data on the prevalence of MS among ischemic heart disease particularly, ACS patients in the region are limited and the available data on MS are mainly done in diabetic, HIV/AIDS and hypertensive patients.9 Many studies have shown that MS has a negative impact on the prognosis of patients who survived ACS.10–12 These studies were predominantly conducted in developed countries among ACS patients managed in different ways which undoubtedly influenced prognosis and the occurrence of new adverse outcomes among these patients. However, an association of MS with risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes varies according to race/ethnicity, geographical area, age, and access to medical care.13 Despite these pieces of evidences, data on the association between MS and the outcome of ACS patients from SSA is rare. Therefore, we evaluated the prevalence and impact of MS 30-day all-cause mortality among patients hospitalized with ACS managed medically in tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia.

Methods

Study Design and Study Population

A prospective cohort study was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia (Saint Peter’s Specialized Hospital and Jimma University Medical Center) from March 2018 to November 2018. In the present study, ACS was diagnosed according to the third universal definition of myocardial infarction.14 Consecutive patients with confirmed ACS diagnosis admitted to selected hospitals who fulfilled the following eligibility criteria were enrolled: (1) age ≥ 18 years; (2) willing to provide written or oral informed consent; (3) type I myocardial infarction. Patients who died before clinical assessment or anthropometric and biochemical measurements were excluded. Additionally, readmitted patients (if enrolled previously), and patients with initial ACS diagnosis changed were excluded from the present study (see ). The study protocol was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jimma University, the Institute of Health before initiating data collection with a reference number of IHRPGD/193/18.

Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis and Scores

Metabolic syndrome was assessed based on the harmonized definition of MS outlined by the IDF Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention, NHLBI, AHA, World Heart Federation, International Atherosclerosis Society, and International Association for the Study of Obesity15 and ethnic-based waist circumference as defined by IDF16 was used. According to this criterion patient with ACS were diagnosed to have MS if they have at least three of the following components: (1) Elevated waist circumference (≥ 94 cm for men or ≥ 80 cm for women); (2) elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥100 mg/dl or on drug treatment for raised glucose; (3) elevated blood pressure ≥130/85 mmHg or on antihypertensive treatment for a patient with a history of hypertension (4) reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [< 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L) in males and < 50 mg/dL (1.29 mmol/L) in females] or and (5) Raised triglycerides ≥ 150 mg/dL (1.7 mmol/L). We did not consider treatment with lipid-lowering drugs as a criterion for patients on lipid-lowering agents for the sole purpose of cardiovascular disease prevention. Waist circumference was measured at the midway between the lower margin of the ribs and the upper margin of the iliac crest in a horizontal plane using plastic metric tape.16 Brachial blood pressure was measured twice by appropriate sized-cuffs in a sitting position and a mean of the two recordings was used in the analyses. Fasting venous blood sample was collected for biochemical measurement in the morning after 8–12 fasting overnight. Accordingly, fasting plasma glucose, high-density lipoprotein, triglyceride low-density lipoprotein, and total cholesterol were measured using Cobas® 6000 analyzer.

Data Collection

Data collection was undertaken by trained health professionals who interviewed the study participants using pre-tested structured questionnaires and examined using standardized instruments and methods. Data collectors also abstracted relevant information (presenting symptoms, clinical data at admissions, cardiovascular risk factors and treatment) from active patient’s medical records prospectively. The primary end-points of the study were 30-day all-cause mortality and in-hospital MACE. The data on primary end-points were collected by checking medical documentation on a daily basis from admission to discharge or death prospectively. For patients who died during hospitalization, physician’s death summary notes were reviewed. For those who died after hospital discharge, telephone contact with family members or caregivers and a death certificate review was used to confirm death. The definitions of clinical endpoints used in the present study are available in ()

Operational Definitions

Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): defined as a composite of in-hospital cardiovascular death, stroke, and non-fatal acute myocardial infarction (re-infarction). Typical chest pain: defined as a retrosternal sensation of pain/discomfort (“angina”) radiating to either or both arm, neck, or jaw, which may be intermittent (usually lasting ≥10 minutes) or persistent. It might be accompanied by additional symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, sweating, and syncope. Atypical presentation: was defined as a non-classic symptoms, including epigastric pain, indigestion-like symptoms, stabbing or pleuritic pain, and isolated dyspnea in the absence of typical chest pain.

Statistical Analysis

Data were entered into Epidata version 4.2 and analyzed using statistical package for social science, version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were presented as proportion and compared between ACS with and without MS using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation when normally distributed and median (interquartile range) when skewed. Continuous variables were compared using the Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate. The 30-day mortality rate among ACS patients with and without MS was compared by using Kaplan–Meier survival curve and Log rank test. Cox regression was used to identify independent predictors of time to 30-day mortality. P-value <0.25 was used as a cutoff point to select candidate variables on binary cox-regression. Multivariable cox-regression with backward step-wise methods was used to identify the independent predictors of 30-day mortality of ACS patients. Two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered as a statistically significant difference.

Results

Baseline Clinical Characteristics and Metabolic Syndrome Components

Among 176 ACS patients studied, 62 (35.2%) had MS. Patients with MS were older (58.5±11.0 vs 54.6±12.2, p= 0.035) compared to those without MS. Similarly, ACS patients with MS were more likely to have a prior history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease (p=0.001). Overall, there was no a statistically significant difference between ACS patients with MS and those without MS regarding sex, residence, and behavioral measures such as smoking and alcohol use (Table 1). The most common components of MS identified were abdominal obesity (46%) and a history of hypertension or blood pressure >130/85 mmHg (45.5%) (Figure 1).
Table 1

Demographics and Baseline Characteristics in Patients with and without MS Presented with ACS

Baseline CharacteristicsMS (n=62)No MS (n=114)All Patients (n=176)P-value
Age (years), mean ±SD58.5±11.054.6±12.256.0±11.90.035
Sex (Male), n (%)39 (62.9)71 (62.3)110 (62.5)0.935
Residence, n (%)
 Urban49 (79.0)86 (75.40)135 (76.7)0.590
 Rural13 (21.0)28 (24.6)41 (23.3)
Educational status, n (%)
 Unable to read/write18 (29.0)38 (33.3)56 (31.8)0.848
 Read and write16 (25.8)24 (21.1)40 (22.7)
 Primary education11 (17.7)18 (15.8)29 (16.5)
 Secondary and above17 (27.4)34 (29.8)51 (29.0)
Occupational status, n (%)
 Employee17 (27.4)26 (22.8)43 (24.4)0.477
 Farmer/labor workers24 (38.7)55 (48.2)79 (44.9)
 Unemployed/retired21 (33.9)33 (28.9)54 (30.7)
Smoking, n (%)9 (14.5)19 (16.7)28 (15.9)0.709
Alcohol use, n (%)19 (30.6)34 (29.8)53 (30.1)0.910
Hypertension, n (%)41 (66.1)33 (28.9)74 (42.0)<0.001
Diabetes, n (%)35 (56.5)11 (9.6)46 (26.1)<0.001
Dyslipidemia*, n (%)43 (69.4)47 (41.2)90 (51.1)<0.001
History of CAD, n (%)22 (35.5)15 (13.2)37 (21.0)0.001
CKD, n (%)12 (19.4)5 (4.4)17 (9.7)0.001

Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; MS, metabolic syndrome; SD-standard deviation.

Figure 1
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics in Patients with and without MS Presented with ACS Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; MS, metabolic syndrome; SD-standard deviation.

Clinical Presentation, Biochemical Data and Key Diagnostics

Patients with MS were more likely to present with atypical symptoms (p=0.026) and high admission systolic blood pressure (p= 0.007) compared to those without MS. Likewise, patients with MS were also present with high admission fasting plasma glucose, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol compared to those without MS (p-value <0.001). There was no significant difference between ACS patients with MS and without MS in ACS subtypes and other clinical findings (Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Measures, and Key Diagnostics in Patients with ACS, Stratified According to Presence or Absence of MS

ParametersMS (n=62)No MS (n=114)All Patients (n=176)P-value
Pre-hospital delay >12h n (%)42 (67.7)77 (67.5)119 (67.6)0.979
Typical chest pain, n (%)32 (51.6)76 (66.7%)108 (61.4)0.026
Atypical presentation, n (%)30 (50.0)38 (333)68 (38.6)
Killip class ≥ II, n (%)40 (64.5)66 (58.0)106 (60.2)0.391
STEMI, n (%)39 (63.0)68 (59.6)107 (60.8)0.673
NSTE-ACS, n (%)23 (37.1)46 (40.4)69 (39.2)
Positive cardiac biomarkers, n (%)58(93.5)98 (86.0)156 (88.6)0.130
Systolic BP (mmHg)132±23.6121±24.9125±24.40.007
Heart rate (bpm)91.6±24.892.7±24.292.3±24.30.791
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)1.18±0.841.05±0.751.10±0.780.309
Hemoglobin (mg/dL)13.2±2.314.0±2.713.7±2.60.05
HDL_C (mg/dL)42.6±9.345.4±9.644.5±9.60.066
LDL-C (n=170) (mg/dL)124.7±42.3105.4±34.8112.3±38.60.002
Cholesterol (n=169) (mg/dL)206.6±70.4169.1±48.2182±59.5<0.001
Triglyceride (mg/dL)152 (101–204.5)120 (89–148)125.3 (90.6–163.0)0.001
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)146.5 (114.7–178.5)95.5 (87.0–98.2)98 (92–140)<0.001
Ejection fraction < 40% (n=170)22 (35.5)46 (40.4)68 (38.6)0.527
Diagnostic angiogram, n (%)21 (35.0)55 (47.4)76 (43.2)0.115

Notes: †expressed as median and standard deviations (SD); ‡expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR).

Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BP, blood pressure; bpm, beat per minute; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome; NSTE-ACS-, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Measures, and Key Diagnostics in Patients with ACS, Stratified According to Presence or Absence of MS Notes: †expressed as median and standard deviations (SD); ‡expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR). Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; BP, blood pressure; bpm, beat per minute; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein-cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome; NSTE-ACS-, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Treatment and In-Hospital Outcomes

Overall, aspirin, dual antiplatelet (aspirin and clopidogrel), and statins were used in more than 90% of ACS patients. Patients with MS were more likely to receive dual antiplatelet therapy compared to those without MS (p=0.015). The use of beta-blockers, ACEI/ARB, and any heparin was sub-optimal (70–80%), and no significant difference between the two groups (Table 3). Patients with MS were more likely to develop MACE during their hospital stay (p=0.026). In particular, patients with MS were more likely to develop heart failure (p=0.017) and cardiogenic shock (p=0.015) compared to those without MS. However, there was no difference regarding cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke and re-infarction between the two groups (Table 3). Discharge medications follow similar patterns to in-hospital medications and comparable between both groups (Table 3).
Table 3

Managements and In-Hospital Complications in Patients Presented with ACS with and without MS

VariablesMS (n=62)No MS (n= 114)All Patients (n=176)P-value
In-hospital medications, n (%)
 Aspirin62 (100)113 (99.1)175 (99.4)0.460
 DAPT61 (98.4)100 (87.7)161 (91.5)0.015
 Statin62 (100)111 (97.4)173 (98.3)0.198
 Beta-blocker52 (84.0)89 (78.1)141 (80.1)0.375
 ACEI/ARB46 (74.2)80 (70.2)126 (71.6)0.572
 Any heparin51(82.3)83 (73.0)134 (76.1)0.160
 Nitrates19 (30.6)33 (28.9)52 (29.5)0.814
 Morphine31(50.0)42 (36.8)63 (41.5)0.091
 Diuretics35 (56.5)59 (51.8)94 (53.4)0.551
PCI3 (5.0)10 (8.6)13 (7.4)0.547
In –hospital complications
 Cardiovascular death, n (%)14 (22.6)15 (13.2)29 (16.5)0.107
 Stroke, n (%)2 (3.2)3 (2.6)5 (2.8)0.821
 Re-infraction, n (%)3 (4.8)7 (6.1)10 (5.7)0.722
 Acute heart failure, n (%)10 (16.1)6 (5.3)16 (9.1)0.017
 Cardiogenic shock, n (%)11 (17.7)7 (6.1)18 (10.2)0.015
 Major bleeding, n (%)3 (4.8)4 (3.5)7 (4.0)0.706
 MACEa, n (%)19 (30.6)20 (17.5)39 (22.2)0.046
Discharge Medications, n (%)MS (n=44)No-MS (n=95)All patients (n=139)
Aspirin43 (97.7)93 (97.7)136 (97.8)0.950
Clopidogrel35 (79.5)72 (75.8)107 (77.0)0.625
Statin42 (95.5)92 (96.8)134 (96.4)0.683
Beta-blocker36 (82.0)82 (86.3)118 (84.9)0.491
ACEI/ARB36 (82.0)69 (72.6)105 (75.5)0.241
Spironolactone7(15.9)21 (22.1)28 (20.1)0.397

Notes: aMACE (composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, and re-infraction).

Abbreviations: ACEI, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ARB, Angiotensin receptor blocker; DAPT, Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel); MACE, Major adverse cardiovascular events; MS, metabolic syndrome; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention.

Managements and In-Hospital Complications in Patients Presented with ACS with and without MS Notes: aMACE (composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal stroke, and re-infraction). Abbreviations: ACEI, Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ARB, Angiotensin receptor blocker; DAPT, Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin + clopidogrel); MACE, Major adverse cardiovascular events; MS, metabolic syndrome; PCI, Percutaneous coronary intervention.

Predictors of 30-Day Mortality

From the total the total of 176 ACS patients, 46 (26.1%) patients were died during the 30-day follow-up. Twelve variables (age, residence, pre-hospital delay, presentation symptoms, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, Killip class, ACS subtypes, MS, and ejection fraction) with p-value <0.25 on bivariate cox-regression were included in the final model of multivariable cox-regression. On multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis, pre-hospital delay >12h, systolic blood pressure, Killip class ≥2, presence of MS, and low ejection fraction were significantly associated with 30-day mortality (Table 4).
Table 4

Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in Patients Presented with ACS

Variables30-Day StatusCHR (95% CI)p-valueAHR (95% CI)p-value
Dead (46)Alive (130)
Age (in years)61.3±11.154.1±11.61.04 (1.02–1.07)0.002*1.03 (0.99–1.05)0.056
Rural residence (ref. urban)17 (37.0)24 (18.5)2.19 (1.21–3.99)0.010*1.05 (0.53–2.09)0.888
Pre-hospital delay >12 h41 (89.1)78 (60%)4.64 (1.83–11.74)0.001*4.32 (1.68–11.10)0.002*
Atypical presentations28 (60.9)40 (30.8)2.89 (1.59–5.23)<0.001*1.49 (0.79–2.79)0.215
Systolic BP (mmHg)116.5±27.8128.0±23.20.98 (0.97–0.99)0.005*0.98 (0.96–0.99)0.001*
Heart rate (bpm)100.2±3589.5±18.51.013(1.003–1.02)0.010*1.003(0.99–1.01)0.535
Serum creatinine (mg/dL)1.3±0.91.0±0.71.18 (0.93–1.49)0.2441.08(0.78–1.48)0.649
Hemoglobin (mg/dL)12.4±2.814.2±2.40.84 (0.77–0.92)<0.001*0.96(0.87–1.07)0.494
Killip class ≥2 (ref. class 1)44 (95.7)62 (47.7)18.1 (4.38–74.6)<0.001*10.69 (2.54–44.95)0.001*
STEMI (ref. NSTE-ACS)32 (69.6)75 (57.7)1.61 (0.86–3.02)0.1371.65 (0.83–3.29)0.152
Presence of MS24 (52.2)38 (29.2)2.260 (1.26–4.02)0.006*3.25 (1.72–6.15)<0.001*
EF <40% (ref. ≥40%)28 (60.9)18 (13.8)2.83 (1.56–5.11)0.001*2.59 (1.39–4.84)0.003*

Notes: *p-value <0.05; †Expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; Bpm, beat per minute; CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio; NSTE-ACS, Non-ST-elevation Acute coronary syndrome; MS, metabolic syndrome; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Predictors of 30-Day Mortality in Patients Presented with ACS Notes: *p-value <0.05; †Expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; Bpm, beat per minute; CI, confidence interval; EF, ejection fraction; HR, hazard ratio; NSTE-ACS, Non-ST-elevation Acute coronary syndrome; MS, metabolic syndrome; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In this study patients who were presented to hospital after 12 h of symptom onset were about four times more likely to have 30-day mortality compared to those presented within 12 h of symptom onset [hazard ratio (HR)=4.32 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.68–11.10]. Patients presented with killip class ≥2 had about 11-fold increased hazard of 30-day mortality compared to those patients presented with Killip class 1(HR=10.7, 95% CI= 2.54–44.95). Similarly, ACS patients with MS were about 3 times more likely to have 30-day mortality than ACS patients without MS (HR =3.25, 95% CI = 1.72–6.15). Likewise, patient who had low ejection fraction (<40%) had three-fold increase in 30-day mortality compared to those who had preserved ejection fraction (HR= 2.59 95% CI= 1.39–4.84). High admission systolic blood pressure was associated with good prognosis (HR = 0.98, 95% CI= 0.96–0.99) (Table 4). Kaplan Meier cumulative 30-day survival curve was compared between ACS patients with MS and without MS using Log rank test (p=0.004) (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Kaplan Meier survival analysis of ACS patients with MetS and without MetS.

Kaplan Meier survival analysis of ACS patients with MetS and without MetS.

Discussion

This study, the first in Ethiopia, showed a high prevalence of MS among patients with ACS. Overall, individuals with MS were more likely to be older, present with atypical symptoms, and have a history of hypertension, diabetes dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and coronary artery disease before the index event. In the present study, MS is associated with in-hospital MACE and 30-day all-cause mortality. Even after adjusting for confounders, MS was still an independent predictor of 30-day all-cause mortality. The prevalence of MS (35.2%) among the patients with ACS in the present study is significantly higher than 11–24% observed in general populations of sub-Saharan Africa.5 However, the prevalence of MS recorded in our study participants was low compared to previous studies done among patients with ACS from six Middle East countries that reported 46% of hospitalized ACS patients had MS.17 Likewise, a study conducted among ACS patients who received coronary intervention in China showed 46% of ACS patients had MS.18 Another study done by Cavalari et al19 indicated that more than half (62%) of ACS patients had MS. This difference might be due to differences in population-level risk factors, difference in MS diagnostic criteria used, and relatively low prevalence of MS in sub-Saharan Africa compared to other regions such as the Middle East and China.20,21 One of the major findings of the present study is that MS is significantly associated with in-hospital MACE. This finding is in line with the Analysis of the Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Gulf RACE), which demonstrated a significant association between MS and non-fatal MACE (heart failure and recurrent myocardial infarction).17 In addition, the report of a prior study done by Zeller et al22 showed a significant association between MS and severe in-hospital heart failure among patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, the association between MS and MACE sustained even on long-term follow-up.18,19,23 This claim could be elucidated in view of the fact that inflammation caused by this syndrome plays a critical role in the process of atherosclerosis, which causes more severe coronary artery disease, restenosis and severe angiographic stenosis based on objective finding such as Syntax and modified Gensini.24,25 The other finding and most probably the main finding of this study is that MS is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality. A significant association between MS and a range of adverse cardiovascular events including mortality were noted in previous studies. Study conducted by Al-Rasadi et al26 which enrolled 1392 ACS patients, reported increased odds of in-hospital death among MS patients with ACS (OR, 4.42; 95% CI: 1.25–15.5; P = 0.020). Similarly, analysis of the Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL)27 trial showed that, ACS patients with MS had around 1.5-fold increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction, recurrent MI and cardiac arrest) including mortality. Moreover, a meta-analysis of 87 cohort studies confirmed that MS was associated with a two-fold increase in cardiovascular mortality and 1.5 fold increase in overall mortality.28 On the other hand, further studies with different duration of follow-up did not demonstrate a significant association between MS and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality particularly in ACS patients managed with PCI.29,30 The high risk of 30-day mortality (HR=3.25, 95% CI=1.72–6.15) observed among ACS patients with MS in the present study could be explained by higher prevalence of prior history of coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease among patients with this syndrome which might influence mortality.31 Additionally, prolonged pre-hospital delay and sub-optimal treatment (lack of reperfusion therapy in our setup) and small sample size might also contribute to the high mortality rate observed among ACS with MS in the present study. The present study has several limitations. First, it included a relatively small number of ACS patients from two tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia. Second, some important predictors (, Syntax score, uric acid, and white blood cell) were missed since the data were collected from an observational study (routine clinical practice). Third, the prevalence of MS might be underestimated since the use of statin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is not considered as MS criteria and patients who died before biochemical measurement and confirmation of ACS diagnosis were excluded. Fourth, the findings of this study are based on data collected from two tertiary hospitals in Ethiopia and cannot be generalized for other sub-Saharan African countries. Therefore, the results of the present study should be used as a hypothesis-generating and large-scale registry data needed to confirm the results.

Conclusions

The prevalence of MS among ACS patients in Ethiopia is high. MS is associated with in-hospital MACE particularly, heart failure and cardiogenic shock with a significant increase in 30-day mortality. Timely diagnosis, prevention, and management of different components of MS could improve the outcome of patients with ACS.
  31 in total

1.  Metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Galassi; Kristi Reynolds; Jiang He
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Prevalence and impact of metabolic syndrome on hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marianne Zeller; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Jack Ravisy; Yves Laurent; Luc Janin-Manificat; Isabelle L'Huillier; Jean-Claude Beer; Alexandra Oudot; Gilles Rioufol; Hamid Makki; Michel Farnier; Luc Rochette; Bruno Vergès; Yves Cottin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-05-23

3.  Metabolic syndrome does not impact long-term survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Ki-Bum Won; Byeong-Keuk Kim; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Dong-Ho Shin; Jung-Sun Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Jong-Won Ha; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Impact of metabolic syndrome on the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in the United States and in Japan.

Authors:  Longjian Liu; Katsuyuki Miura; Akira Fujiyoshi; Aya Kadota; Naoko Miyagawa; Yasuyuki Nakamura; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Akira Okayama; Tomonori Okamura; Hirotsugu Ueshima
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Authors:  K G M M Alberti; Robert H Eckel; Scott M Grundy; Paul Z Zimmet; James I Cleeman; Karen A Donato; Jean-Charles Fruchart; W Philip T James; Catherine M Loria; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Relationship between metabolic syndrome and angiographic severity of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Reza Miri; Amir Sajjadieh; Mohammad Parsamahjoob; Bahareh Hajibaratali; Masood Shekarchizadeh; Ali Asghar Kolahi; Mehran Sadeghi; Zahra Ahmadi; Hamedreza Farmanara; Mansoureh Shekarchizadeh-Esfahani
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2016-09

8.  The Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Ethiopian Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sintayehu Ambachew; Aklilu Endalamaw; Abebaw Worede; Yalewayker Tegegne; Mulugeta Melku; Belete Biadgo
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 9.  Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Mainland China: a meta-analysis of published studies.

Authors:  Ri Li; Wenchen Li; Zhijun Lun; Huiping Zhang; Zhi Sun; Joseph Sam Kanu; Shuang Qiu; Yi Cheng; Yawen Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Geographical variation in the prevalence of obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes among US adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Gurka; Stephanie L Filipp; Mark D DeBoer
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Association of Metabolic Syndrome With Long-Term Cardiovascular Risks and All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Lin Liu; Xiaofeng Su; Zhe Zhao; Jiming Han; Jianhua Li; Weihao Xu; Zijun He; Yinghui Gao; Kaibing Chen; Libo Zhao; Yan Gao; Huanhuan Wang; JingJing Guo; Junling Lin; Tianzhi Li; Xiangqun Fang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.