Hee Ji Shin1, Min Jeong Jo1, Ik Sup Jin1, Chun-Woong Park1, Jin-Seok Kim2, Dae Hwan Shin1. 1. College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28160, Republic of Korea. 2. Drug Information Research Institute (DIRI), College of Pharmacy, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, 04310, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a nanocarrier formulation incorporating fenbendazole (FEN) and rapamycin (RAPA) with strong efficacy against A549 cancer cells. As FEN and RAPA are poorly soluble in water, it is difficult to apply them clinically in vivo. Therefore, we attempted to resolve this problem by encapsulating these drugs in polymeric micelles. METHODS: We evaluated drug synergy using the combination index (CI) values of various molar ratios of FEN and RAPA. We formed and tested micelles composed of different polymers. Moreover, we conducted cytotoxicity, stability, release, pharmacokinetic, and biodistribution studies to investigate the antitumor effects of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles. RESULTS: We selected mPEG-b-PCL-containing FEN and RAPA at a molar ratio of 1:2 because these particles were consistent in size and had high encapsulation efficiency (EE, %) and drug loading (DL, %) capacity. The in vitro cytotoxicity was assessed for various FEN, RAPA, and combined FEN/RAPA formulations. After long-term exposures, both the solutions and the micelles had similar efficacy against A549 cancer cells. The in vivo pharmacokinetic study revealed that FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles had a relatively higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2 h) and 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8 h) and plasma concentration at time zero (Co) than that of the FEN/RAPA solution. The in vivo biodistribution assay revealed that the IV injection of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles resulted in lower pulmonary FEN concentration than the IV injection of the FEN/RAPA solution. CONCLUSION: When FEN and RAPA had a 1:2 molar ratio, they showed synergism. Additionally, using data from in vitro cytotoxicity, synergism between a 1:2 molar ratio of FEN and RAPA was observed in the micelle formulation. The FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelle had enhanced bioavailability than the FEN/RAPA solution.
PURPOSE: We aimed to develop a nanocarrier formulation incorporating fenbendazole (FEN) and rapamycin (RAPA) with strong efficacy against A549 cancer cells. As FEN and RAPA are poorly soluble in water, it is difficult to apply them clinically in vivo. Therefore, we attempted to resolve this problem by encapsulating these drugs in polymeric micelles. METHODS: We evaluated drug synergy using the combination index (CI) values of various molar ratios of FEN and RAPA. We formed and tested micelles composed of different polymers. Moreover, we conducted cytotoxicity, stability, release, pharmacokinetic, and biodistribution studies to investigate the antitumor effects of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles. RESULTS: We selected mPEG-b-PCL-containing FEN and RAPA at a molar ratio of 1:2 because these particles were consistent in size and had high encapsulation efficiency (EE, %) and drug loading (DL, %) capacity. The in vitro cytotoxicity was assessed for various FEN, RAPA, and combined FEN/RAPA formulations. After long-term exposures, both the solutions and the micelles had similar efficacy against A549 cancer cells. The in vivo pharmacokinetic study revealed that FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles had a relatively higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2 h) and 0 to 8 h (AUC0-8 h) and plasma concentration at time zero (Co) than that of the FEN/RAPA solution. The in vivo biodistribution assay revealed that the IV injection of FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelles resulted in lower pulmonary FEN concentration than the IV injection of the FEN/RAPA solution. CONCLUSION: When FEN and RAPA had a 1:2 molar ratio, they showed synergism. Additionally, using data from in vitro cytotoxicity, synergism between a 1:2 molar ratio of FEN and RAPA was observed in the micelle formulation. The FEN/RAPA-loaded mPEG-b-PCL micelle had enhanced bioavailability than the FEN/RAPA solution.
Authors: Gerald Batist; Karen A Gelmon; Kim N Chi; Wilson H Miller; Stephen K L Chia; Lawrence D Mayer; Christine E Swenson; Andrew S Janoff; Arthur C Louie Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Pat Gulhati; Qingsong Cai; Jing Li; Jianyu Liu; Piotr G Rychahou; Suimin Qiu; Eun Y Lee; Scott R Silva; Kanika A Bowen; Tianyan Gao; B Mark Evers Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Qingyu Zhou; Justin Doherty; Antonina Akk; Luke E Springer; Ping Fan; Ivan Spasojevic; Ganesh V Halade; Huanghe Yang; Christine T N Pham; Samuel A Wickline; Hua Pan Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2022-01-21 Impact factor: 5.076