| Literature DB >> 34295072 |
Kalyan Pandey1, Padmalaya Devi1, Prafulla Kumar Das1, Swodeep Mohanty1, Kunal Goutam1, Subrat Samantara1, Bharat Bhushan Satpathy1, Nilesh Patil1, Mohanlal Khadia1, Subhransu Sekhar Lenka1.
Abstract
The only hope of cure in carcinoma stomach is gastrectomy; it can be total or partial depending upon the location of the tumor. While there is no controversy in the extent of resection, the choice of anastomosis after partial gastrectomy is a matter of debate. For pyloric lesions, we felt that in spite of the ease of performing surgery, simplicity, being physiological, and time-saving, Billroth I is underutilized. Hence, the study rationale was to compare Billroth I and Billroth II anastomosis post-gastric resection in the surgical management of gastric cancer. This was a retrospective study performed in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Acharya Harihar Regional Cancer Centre (AHRCC), Cuttack, Odisha. A total of 95 patients who underwent distal radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer during 2016 and 2017 were included in the study. Nineteen patients underwent Billroth I reconstruction and 76 patients underwent Billroth II reconstruction. In the case of both groups, no statistically significant differences (p˂0.05) were found in terms of early post-operative complications or long-term post-operative follow-up in our experience. Billroth I reconstruction is a simple, oncologically safe, economical, and physiological procedure. It can be performed when there is availability of large stomach remnant post-gastric resection. However, there is no significant difference between Billroth I and Billroth II in terms of patient's recovery and post-operative complications. © Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Billroth I; Billroth II; Carcinoma stomach; Gastrectomy
Year: 2021 PMID: 34295072 PMCID: PMC8272779 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01288-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol ISSN: 0975-7651