Literature DB >> 34294898

Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts.

Nancy Shackelford1,2, Gustavo B Paterno3,4, Daniel E Winkler5, Todd E Erickson6,7, Elizabeth A Leger8, Lauren N Svejcar9, Martin F Breed10, Akasha M Faist11, Peter A Harrison12, Michael F Curran13, Qinfeng Guo14, Anita Kirmer15, Darin J Law16, Kevin Z Mganga17, Seth M Munson18, Lauren M Porensky19, R Emiliano Quiroga20,21, Péter Török22, Claire E Wainwright23, Ali Abdullahi24, Matt A Bahm25, Elizabeth A Ballenger26, Nichole Barger27, Owen W Baughman28, Carina Becker29, Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja30, Chad S Boyd9, Carla M Burton31, Philip J Burton31, Eman Calleja32, Peter J Carrick33, Alex Caruana32, Charlie D Clements34, Kirk W Davies9, Balázs Deák35, Jessica Drake36, Sandra Dullau15, Joshua Eldridge37, Erin Espeland38, Hannah L Farrell18, Stephen E Fick5, Magda Garbowski39, Enrique G de la Riva40, Peter J Golos7, Penelope A Grey41, Barry Heydenrych42, Patricia M Holmes43, Jeremy J James44, Jayne Jonas-Bratten45, Réka Kiss35, Andrea T Kramer46, Julie E Larson27, Juan Lorite47,48, C Ellery Mayence49, Luis Merino-Martín50, Tamás Miglécz51, Suanne Jane Milton52,53, Thomas A Monaco54, Arlee M Montalvo55, Jose A Navarro-Cano56, Mark W Paschke57, Pablo Luis Peri58, Monica L Pokorny59, Matthew J Rinella60, Nelmarie Saayman61, Merilynn C Schantz62, Tina Parkhurst63, Eric W Seabloom64, Katharine L Stuble65, Shauna M Uselman66, Orsolya Valkó35, Kari Veblen67, Scott Wilson68, Megan Wong69, Zhiwei Xu70, Katharine L Suding27,71.   

Abstract

Restoration of degraded drylands is urgently needed to mitigate climate change, reverse desertification and secure livelihoods for the two billion people who live in these areas. Bold global targets have been set for dryland restoration to restore millions of hectares of degraded land. These targets have been questioned as overly ambitious, but without a global evaluation of successes and failures it is impossible to gauge feasibility. Here we examine restoration seeding outcomes across 174 sites on six continents, encompassing 594,065 observations of 671 plant species. Our findings suggest reasons for optimism. Seeding had a positive impact on species presence: in almost a third of all treatments, 100% of species seeded were growing at first monitoring. However, dryland restoration is risky: 17% of projects failed, with no establishment of any seeded species, and consistent declines were found in seeded species as projects matured. Across projects, higher seeding rates and larger seed sizes resulted in a greater probability of recruitment, with further influences on species success including site aridity, taxonomic identity and species life form. Our findings suggest that investigations examining these predictive factors will yield more effective and informed restoration decision-making.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34294898     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-021-01510-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  5 in total

1.  Can initial intraspecific spatial aggregation increase multi-year coexistence by creating temporal priority?

Authors:  Lauren M Porensky; Kurt J Vaughn; Truman P Young
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Conservation. Committing to ecological restoration.

Authors:  Katharine Suding; Eric Higgs; Margaret Palmer; J Baird Callicott; Christopher B Anderson; Matthew Baker; John J Gutrich; Kelly L Hondula; Matthew C LaFevor; Brendon M H Larson; Alan Randall; J B Ruhl; Katrina Z S Schwartz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Bet hedging in a guild of desert annuals.

Authors:  D Lawrence Venable
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  A meta-analysis contrasting active versus passive restoration practices in dryland agricultural ecosystems.

Authors:  M Florencia Miguel; H Scott Butterfield; Christopher J Lortie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Accelerated dryland expansion regulates future variability in dryland gross primary production.

Authors:  Jingyu Yao; Heping Liu; Jianping Huang; Zhongming Gao; Guoyin Wang; Dan Li; Haipeng Yu; Xingyuan Chen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Abiotic and biotic responses to woody debris additions in restored old fields in a multi-site Before-After-Control-Impact experiment.

Authors:  Tina Parkhurst; Suzanne M Prober; Mark Farrell; Rachel J Standish
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Phenotypes and environment predict seedling survival for seven co-occurring Great Basin plant taxa growing with invasive grass.

Authors:  Alison C Agneray; Thomas L Parchman; Elizabeth A Leger
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 3.167

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.