| Literature DB >> 34294807 |
Ramon Amaro de Sales1, Evandro Chaves de Oliveira2, Eduardo Buzatto2, Robson Ferreira de Almeida2, Marcus José Alves de Lima3, Sávio da Silva Berilli2, Ronilda Lana Aguiar2, Mario Lovo2, Robson Prucoli Posse2, Joana Casagrande Dos Santos2, Waylson Zancanella Quartezani2, Rodrigo Amaro de Salles4, Felipe Cunha Siman5.
Abstract
Photo-selective shading screens are emerging practices that aim to combine crop physical protection with different solar radiation filtration to achieve desired physiological responses. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of photo-selective shading screens on the growth and physiology of purple lettuce for two transplanting seasons in tropical climate in Brazil. A 2 × 4 factorial arrangement was used, being considered the first factor, the transplanting season (spring and fall), and the second factor is the three 35% shading photo-selective shading screens (red, black and silver) and full sun control. The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four replications. The variables studied were: total fresh matter, total dry matter, leaf number, stem diameter, stem length, leaf area, SPAD chlorophyll index, nitrogen balance indexes, chlorophyll, flavonoids and anthocyanins. The photo-selective shading screens influenced the microclimate and the growth variables of purple lettuce, mainly when these plants were sown in the fall. Planting lettuce during spring may result in lower yields due to the higher investment of plants in secondary metabolites to defend against abiotic stress. According to the results, photo-selective shading screens are an appropriate agronomic technique to reduce phenolic compounds and improve lettuce cultivation conditions and can be implemented within protected cultivation practices to improve crop performance.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34294807 PMCID: PMC8298437 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94437-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The average temperature variability within the photo-selective screen structures during the cultivation period (30 days) of the lettuce in the autumn and spring seasons.
Summary of analysis of variance of morphological and physiological characteristics.
| Source of variance | DF | Mean squares (MS) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFM | TDM | NL | SD | SL | LAa | SPAD | ||
| Season | 1 | 30,381.1** | 12.90* | 153.5* | 439.47** | 12,394.2** | 3262.6** | 222.65* |
| Error a | 4 | 243.7 | 1.124 | 1.75 | 0.81 | 108.4 | 28.61 | 4.39 |
| Screen | 3 | 1507.0* | 3.376* | 2.37ns | 0.86ns | 1341.1** | 189.4* | 32.85** |
| Season × screen | 3 | 221.9ns | 0.774ns | 9.57ns | 1.14ns | 219.4ns | 45.8 ns | 7.31ns |
| Error b | 12 | 393.4 | 0.765 | 5.16 | 2.89 | 105.5 | 50.98 | 3.75 |
TFM total fresh matter (g), TDM total dry matter (g), NL number of leaves, SD stem diameter (mm), SL stem length (mm), LA leaf area (cm2).
*Significant at 5% of probability (p < 0.05).
** Significant at 1% of probability (p < 0.01); ns no significant.
aValues divided by 103.
Mean values of total fresh and dry matter (MPT and MDT in g), number of leaves (NL), stem diameter (SD in mm), stem length (SL in mm), leaf area (LA in cm2) and leaf chlorophyll index (SPAD) of purple lettuce grown in different seasons of the year.
| Seasons | TFM | TDM | NL | SD | SL | LA | SPAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | 91.9 b | 5.6 b | 13.9 b | 12.5 b | 67.8 b | 1005.6 b | 26.6 a |
| Autumn | 163.0 a | 7.1 a | 19.0 a | 21.0 a | 113.3 a | 1742.9 a | 20.5 b |
| CV% | 12.24 | 16.71 | 8.01 | 5.36 | 11.49 | 12.31 | 8.89 |
Means followed by the same letter do not differ from each other at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05) by the Tukey test.
Average values of nitrogen balance (NBIG and NBIR), chlorophyll (SFRG and SFRR), flavonoids (FLAV) and anthocyanins (ANTHRG and ANTHRB) indexes of purple lettuce grown at different seasons.
| Seasons | NBIG | NBIR | SFRG | SFRR | FLAV | ANTHRG | ANTHRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | 1.07 b | 0.59 b | 1.50 a | 1.30 a | 0.30 a | 0.173 a | − 0.736 a |
| Autumn | 1.89 a | 1.22 a | 1.12 b | 0.89 b | − 0.14 b | 0.135 a | − 0.733 a |
| CV% | 7.61 | 15.05 | 11.00 | 11.39 | 22.99 | 19.37 | 2.48 |
Means followed by the same letter do not differ from each other at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05) by the Tukey test.
Figure 2Correlation analysis between the response variables studied for purple lettuce. Significant a *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Positive and negative correlations are displayed in blue and red, respectively; the color intensity and circle size are proportional to the correlation coefficients. TFM total fresh matter, TDM total dry matter, NL number of leaves, SD stem diameter, SL stem length, LA leaf area, SPAD chlorophyll index; nitrogen balance indexes (NBIG and NBIR), chlorophyll (SFRG and SFRR), flavonoids (FLAV) and anthocyanins (ANTHRG and ANTHRB).
Average values of total fresh and dry matter (GFR and TDM in g), number of leaves (NL), stem diameter (SD in mm), stem length (SL in mm), leaf area (LA in cm2) and chlorophyll index (SPAD) of purple lettuce cultivated in different photo-selective screens and in full sun.
| Treatments | TFM | TDM | NL | SD | SL | LA | SPAD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Red | 141.8 a | 7.3 a | 16.9 a | 17.2 a | 98.1 a | 1563.5 a | 22.0 b |
| T-Black | 134.9 ab | 6.5 ab | 17.1 a | 16.3 a | 102.5 a | 1428.1 ab | 22.9 b |
| T-Silver | 127.9 ab | 6.0 ab | 16.2 a | 16.7 a | 92.6 a | 1367.8 ab | 22.3 b |
| T-Control | 105.2 b | 5.6 b | 15.7 a | 16.8 a | 69.0 b | 1137.7 b | 27.0 a |
| CV% | 15.56 | 13.79 | 13.76 | 10.12 | 11.34 | 16.42 | 8.22 |
Means followed by the same letter do not differ from each other at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05) by the Tukey test.
Mean values of nitrogen balance (NBIG and NBIR), chlorophyll (SFRG and SFRR), flavonoids (FLAV) and purple lettuce anthocyanins (ANTHRG and ANTHRB) indices grown in different photo-selective screens and in full sun.
| Treatments | NBIG | NBIR | SFRG | SFRR | FLAV | ANTHRG | ANTHRB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T-Red | 1.47 a | 0.92 a | 1.18 b | 1.04 b | 0.03 c | 0.128 b | − 0.763 b |
| T-Black | 1.45 a | 0.91 a | 1.22 ab | 1.05 ab | 0.04 c | 0.136 b | − 0.761 b |
| T-Silver | 1.56 a | 0.91 a | 1.42 a | 1.14 ab | 0.09 b | 0.142 ab | − 0.706 a |
| T-Control | 1.47 a | 0.90 a | 1.43 a | 1.16 a | 0.16 a | 0.208 a | − 0.708 ab |
| CV% | 8.43 | 15.79 | 10.68 | 6.37 | 20.21 | 26.14 | 4.44 |
Means followed by the same letter do not differ from each other at the 5% probability level (p < 0.05) by the Tukey test.
Figure 3Principal component analysis of variables associated with lettuce growth and physiology cultivated two planting seasons and in different photo-selective screens (black, control (full sun), silver and red). (1) Spring; (2) Autumn. TFM total fresh matter, TDM total dry matter, NL number of leaves, SD stem diameter, SL stem length, LA leaf area, SPAD chlorophyll index; nitrogen balance indexes (NBIG and NBIR), chlorophyll (SFRG and SFRR), flavonoids (FLAV) and anthocyanins (ANTHRG and ANTHRB).