| Literature DB >> 34294154 |
Freda Lalrohlui1, Souvik Ghatak1, John Zohmingthanga2, Vanlal Hruaii3, Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar4.
Abstract
Over the last few decades, Mizoram has shown an increase in cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus; however, no in-depth scientific records are available to understand the occurrence of the disease. In this study, 500 patients and 500 healthy controls were recruited to understand the possible influence of their dietary and lifestyle habits in relation with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A multivariate analysis using Cox regression was carried out to find the influence of dietary and lifestyle factors, and an unpaired t test was performed to find the difference in the levels of biochemical tests. Out of 500 diabetic patients, 261 (52.3%) were males and 239 (47.7%) were females, and among the control group, 238 (47.7%) were males and 262 (52.3%) were females. Fermented pork fat, Sa-um (odds ratio (OR) 18.98), was observed to be a potential risk factor along with tuibur (OR 0.1243) for both males and females. Creatinine level was found to be differentially regulated between the male and female diabetic patients. This is the first report of fermented pork fat and tobacco (in a water form) to be the risk factors for diabetes. The unique traditional foods like Sa-um and local lifestyle habits like tuibur of the Mizo population may trigger the risk for the prevalence of the disease, and this may serve as a model to study other populations with similar traditional practices.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical profiles; Dietary habits; Mizo population; Sa-um; Tuibur; Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Year: 2021 PMID: 34294154 PMCID: PMC8296625 DOI: 10.1186/s41043-021-00257-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Popul Nutr ISSN: 1606-0997 Impact factor: 2.000
Significant lifestyle and dietary factors used in the univariate analysis. The univariate analysis was carried out to rule out the factors that are deemed to be important to be further analyzed using the multivariate analysis. The odds ratio between the diabetic patients and healthy controls was compared. The 95% CI value was obtained between the cases and the control with a significant value of p (< 0.05)
| Factors | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 1.024 | 0.799–1.313 | 0.8493 |
| Age (> 45 diabetic vs > 45 years control ) | 0.0893 | 0.0426–0.1871 | < 0.0001 |
| Education (diabetic vs control) | 1.113 | 0.833–2.141 | 1.4235 |
| Income (diabetic vs control) | 1.089 | 0.801–1.475 | 0.9578 |
| Cigarette consumption | 0.7465 | 0.5940–0.9382 | < 0.0122 |
| Alcohol consumption | 0.0117 | 0.0016–0.0844 | < 0.0001 |
| Paan consumption | 0.0571 | 0.0348–0.0939 | < 0.0001 |
| Sahdah consumption | 1.8776 | 1.5139–2.3286 | < 0.0001 |
| Tuibur consumption | 2.0130 | 1.3908–2.9137 | 0.0002 |
| Sa-um consumption | 2.2667 | 1.7115–3.0019 | < 0.0001 |
| Meat consumption | 0.4115 | 0.3344–0.5064 | < 0.0001 |
| Smoked meat consumption | 0.0695 | 0.0499–0.0970 | < 0.0001 |
| Salt consumption | 0.2882 | 0.2309–0.3597 | < 0.0001 |
Significant lifestyle and dietary factors used in the multivariate analysis. The factors that were deemed to be of potential significance from the univariate analysis were further analyzed using the multivariate analysis. The odds ratio between the diabetic patients and healthy controls was compared. The 95% CI value was obtained between the cases and the control with a significant value of p (< 0.05)
| Factors | Odds ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1491 | 0.0419–0.5300 | 0.0033 | |
| 0.1006 | 0.0537–0.1885 | < 0.0001 | |
| 0.1243 | 0.0530–0.2918 | < 0.0001 | |
| 18.9802 | 9.8182–36.6918 | < 0.0001 | |
| 0.0703 | 0.0412–0.1200 | < 0.0001 | |
| 0.2134 | 0.1400–0.3251 | < 0.0001 |
Fig. 1Estimated ROC curve for significant demographic factors from the multivariate analysis
Fig. 2Estimated risk for the significant demographic factors between diabetic and healthy controls using the multivariate analysis
Fig. 3Scatter plot showing the comparison of different clinical factors (after performing an unpaired t test) between male and female diabetic patients. Comparison of A fasting blood sugar, B post-prandial blood sugar, C HbA1c, D creatinine, E cholesterol, F BMI index, and G age