Randi Ballangrud1, Karina Aase2,3, Anne Vifladt2. 1. Department of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Teknologivn. 22, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway. randi.ballangrud@ntnu.no. 2. Department of Health Sciences Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Teknologivn. 22, 2815, Gjøvik, Norway. 3. Center for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholms hus, Kjell Arholms gate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Team training interventions to improve team effectiveness within healthcare are widely used. However, in-depth knowledge of how healthcare professionals experience such team training curricula and their implementation processes, as well as how contextual factors impact implementation, is currently missing. The aim of this study is therefore to describe healthcare professionals' experiences with the implementation of a longitudinal interprofessional team training program in a surgical ward. METHODS: A descriptive design was applied based on qualitative semi-structured focus group interviews with 11 healthcare professionals. A convenience sample of physicians (n = 4), registered nurses (n = 4), and certified nursing assistants (n = 3) was divided into three professionally based focus groups, which were interviewed at three time intervals over a period of 1 year. INTERVENTION: The validated and evidence-based team training program Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) was implemented in a surgical ward at a hospital between January 2016 and June 2017. The team training program included three phases: 1) assessment and planning, 2) training and implementation, and 3) sustainment. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals' experiences with the content of the team training program varied from valuing the different elements of it to seeing the challenges in implementing the elements in clinical practice. A one-day training course was found to be especially beneficial for interprofessional collaboration at the ward. Over time, the nursing staff seemed to maintain their motivation for the implementation of the tools and strategies, while the physicians became less actively involved. Contextual ward factors influenced the adoption and utilization of the tools and strategies of the program both positively and negatively. The healthcare professionals' experienced the implementation of the team training program as positive for the patient safety culture at the ward in the forms of increased awareness of teamwork and open communication. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the implementation of a team training program in a surgical ward is dependent on a set of factors related to content, process, context, and impact. Knowledge on how and why a team training program work supports the transferability to clinical practice in further planning of team training measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is part of a larger research project with a study protocol that was registered retrospectively on 05.30.17, with the trial registration number ISRCTN13997367 .
BACKGROUND: Team training interventions to improve team effectiveness within healthcare are widely used. However, in-depth knowledge of how healthcare professionals experience such team training curricula and their implementation processes, as well as how contextual factors impact implementation, is currently missing. The aim of this study is therefore to describe healthcare professionals' experiences with the implementation of a longitudinal interprofessional team training program in a surgical ward. METHODS: A descriptive design was applied based on qualitative semi-structured focus group interviews with 11 healthcare professionals. A convenience sample of physicians (n = 4), registered nurses (n = 4), and certified nursing assistants (n = 3) was divided into three professionally based focus groups, which were interviewed at three time intervals over a period of 1 year. INTERVENTION: The validated and evidence-based team training program Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) was implemented in a surgical ward at a hospital between January 2016 and June 2017. The team training program included three phases: 1) assessment and planning, 2) training and implementation, and 3) sustainment. RESULTS: Healthcare professionals' experiences with the content of the team training program varied from valuing the different elements of it to seeing the challenges in implementing the elements in clinical practice. A one-day training course was found to be especially beneficial for interprofessional collaboration at the ward. Over time, the nursing staff seemed to maintain their motivation for the implementation of the tools and strategies, while the physicians became less actively involved. Contextual ward factors influenced the adoption and utilization of the tools and strategies of the program both positively and negatively. The healthcare professionals' experienced the implementation of the team training program as positive for the patient safety culture at the ward in the forms of increased awareness of teamwork and open communication. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that the implementation of a team training program in a surgical ward is dependent on a set of factors related to content, process, context, and impact. Knowledge on how and why a team training program work supports the transferability to clinical practice in further planning of team training measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is part of a larger research project with a study protocol that was registered retrospectively on 05.30.17, with the trial registration number ISRCTN13997367 .
Authors: Peter Craig; Paul Dieppe; Sally Macintyre; Susan Michie; Irwin Nazareth; Mark Petticrew Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Lauren A Welsch; Johanna Hoch; Rebecca Deal Poston; V Andrea Parodi; Muge Akpinar-Elci Journal: J Interprof Care Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 2.338
Authors: Christine E Sammer; Kristine Lykens; Karan P Singh; Douglas A Mains; Nuha A Lackan Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Sallie J Weaver; Lisa H Lubomksi; Renee F Wilson; Elizabeth R Pfoh; Kathryn A Martinez; Sydney M Dy Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 25.391