Jun-Jun Liu1, Anna W Schoettle2, Richard A Sniezko3, Holly Williams4, Arezoo Zamany4, Benjamin Rancourt4. 1. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, BC, V8Z 1M5, Canada. jun-jun.liu@canada.ca. 2. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Road, Fort Collins, CO, 80526, USA. 3. USDA Forest Service, Dorena Genetic Resource Center, 34963 Shoreview Road, Cottage Grove, Oregon, 97424, USA. 4. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 506 West Burnside Road, Victoria, BC, V8Z 1M5, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proteins with nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains (NLR) make up one of most important resistance (R) families for plants to resist attacks from various pathogens and pests. The available transcriptomes of limber pine (Pinus flexilis) allow us to characterize NLR genes and related resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in host resistance against Cronartium ribicola, the causal fungal pathogen of white pine blister rust (WPBR) on five-needle pines throughout the world. We previously mapped a limber pine major gene locus (Cr4) that confers complete resistance to C. ribicola on the Pinus consensus linkage group 8 (LG-8). However, genetic distribution of NLR genes as well as their divergence between resistant and susceptible alleles are still unknown. RESULTS: To identify NLR genes at the Cr4 locus, the present study re-sequenced a total of 480 RGAs using targeted sequencing in a Cr4-segregated seed family. Following a call of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genetic mapping, a total of 541 SNPs from 155 genes were mapped across 12 LGs. Three putative NLR genes were newly mapped in the Cr4 region, including one that co-segregated with Cr4. The tight linkage of NLRs with Cr4-controlled phenotypes was further confirmed by bulked segregation analysis (BSA) using extreme-phenotype genome-wide association study (XP-GWAS) for significance test. Local tandem duplication in the Cr4 region was further supported by syntenic analysis using the sugar pine genome sequence. Significant gene divergences have been observed in the NLR family, revealing that diversifying selection pressures are relatively higher in local duplicated genes. Most genes showed similar expression patterns at low levels, but some were affected by genetic background related to disease resistance. Evidence from fine genetic dissection, evolutionary analysis, and expression profiling suggests that two NLR genes are the most promising candidates for Cr4 against WPBR. CONCLUSION: This study provides fundamental insights into genetic architecture of the Cr4 locus as well as a set of NLR variants for marker-assisted selection in limber pine breeding. Novel NLR genes were identified at the Cr4 locus and the Cr4 candidates will aid deployment of this R gene in combination with other major/minor genes in the limber pine breeding program.
BACKGROUND: Proteins with nucleotide binding site (NBS) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domains (NLR) make up one of most important resistance (R) families for plants to resist attacks from various pathogens and pests. The available transcriptomes of limber pine (Pinus flexilis) allow us to characterize NLR genes and related resistance gene analogs (RGAs) in host resistance against Cronartium ribicola, the causal fungal pathogen of white pine blister rust (WPBR) on five-needle pines throughout the world. We previously mapped a limber pine major gene locus (Cr4) that confers complete resistance to C. ribicola on the Pinus consensus linkage group 8 (LG-8). However, genetic distribution of NLR genes as well as their divergence between resistant and susceptible alleles are still unknown. RESULTS: To identify NLR genes at the Cr4 locus, the present study re-sequenced a total of 480 RGAs using targeted sequencing in a Cr4-segregated seed family. Following a call of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and genetic mapping, a total of 541 SNPs from 155 genes were mapped across 12 LGs. Three putative NLR genes were newly mapped in the Cr4 region, including one that co-segregated with Cr4. The tight linkage of NLRs with Cr4-controlled phenotypes was further confirmed by bulked segregation analysis (BSA) using extreme-phenotype genome-wide association study (XP-GWAS) for significance test. Local tandem duplication in the Cr4 region was further supported by syntenic analysis using the sugar pine genome sequence. Significant gene divergences have been observed in the NLR family, revealing that diversifying selection pressures are relatively higher in local duplicated genes. Most genes showed similar expression patterns at low levels, but some were affected by genetic background related to disease resistance. Evidence from fine genetic dissection, evolutionary analysis, and expression profiling suggests that two NLR genes are the most promising candidates for Cr4 against WPBR. CONCLUSION: This study provides fundamental insights into genetic architecture of the Cr4 locus as well as a set of NLR variants for marker-assisted selection in limber pine breeding. Novel NLR genes were identified at the Cr4 locus and the Cr4 candidates will aid deployment of this R gene in combination with other major/minor genes in the limber pine breeding program.
Authors: Michael Giolai; Pirita Paajanen; Walter Verweij; Lawrence Percival-Alwyn; David Baker; Kamil Witek; Florian Jupe; Glenn Bryan; Ingo Hein; Jonathan D G Jones; Matthew D Clark Journal: Biotechniques Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 1.993
Authors: Jason A Holliday; Sally N Aitken; Janice E K Cooke; Bruno Fady; Santiago C González-Martínez; Myriam Heuertz; Juan-Pablo Jaramillo-Correa; Christian Lexer; Margaret Staton; Ross W Whetten; Christophe Plomion Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Matthew Weiss; Richard A Sniezko; Daniela Puiu; Marc W Crepeau; Kristian Stevens; Steven L Salzberg; Charles H Langley; David B Neale; Amanda R De La Torre Journal: Plant J Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Kamil Witek; Florian Jupe; Agnieszka I Witek; David Baker; Matthew D Clark; Jonathan D G Jones Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Florian Jupe; Kamil Witek; Walter Verweij; Jadwiga Sliwka; Leighton Pritchard; Graham J Etherington; Dan Maclean; Peter J Cock; Richard M Leggett; Glenn J Bryan; Linda Cardle; Ingo Hein; Jonathan D G Jones Journal: Plant J Date: 2013-10-08 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Jun-Jun Liu; Arezoo Zamany; Charlie Cartwright; Yu Xiang; Simon F Shamoun; Benjamin Rancourt Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.627