C Fermaniuk1, K G Fleurial1, E Wiley2, S M Landhäusser1. 1. Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 2. Department of Biology, University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carbon reserves are a critical source of energy and substrates that allow trees to cope with periods of minimal carbon gain and/or high carbon demands, conditions which are prevalent in high-latitude forests. However, we have a poor understanding of carbon reserve dynamics at the whole-tree level in mature boreal trees. We therefore sought to quantify the seasonal changes in whole-tree and organ-level carbon reserve pools in mature boreal Betula papyrifera. METHODS: Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC; soluble sugars and starch) tissue concentrations were measured at key phenological stages throughout a calendar year in the roots, stem (inner bark and xylem), branches and leaves, and scaled up to estimate changes in organ and whole-tree NSC pool sizes. Fine root and stem growth were also measured to compare the timing of growth processes with changes in NSC pools. KEY RESULTS: The whole-tree NSC pool increased from its spring minimum to its maximum at bud set, producing an average seasonal fluctuation of 0.96 kg per tree. This fluctuation represents a 72 % change in the whole-tree NSC pool, which greatly exceeds the relative change reported for more temperate conspecifics. At the organ level, branches accounted for roughly 48-60 % of the whole-tree NSC pool throughout the year, and their seasonal fluctuation was four to eight times greater than that observed in the stemwood, coarse roots and inner bark. CONCLUSIONS: Branches in boreal B. papyrifera were the largest and most dynamic storage pool, suggesting that storage changes at the branch level largely drive whole-tree storage dynamics in these trees. The greater whole-tree seasonal NSC fluctuation in boreal vs. temperate B. papyrifera may result from (1) higher soluble sugar concentration requirements in branches for frost protection, and/or (2) a larger reliance on reserves to fuel new leaf and shoot growth in the spring.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carbon reserves are a critical source of energy and substrates that allow trees to cope with periods of minimal carbon gain and/or high carbon demands, conditions which are prevalent in high-latitude forests. However, we have a poor understanding of carbon reserve dynamics at the whole-tree level in mature boreal trees. We therefore sought to quantify the seasonal changes in whole-tree and organ-level carbon reserve pools in mature boreal Betula papyrifera. METHODS: Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC; soluble sugars and starch) tissue concentrations were measured at key phenological stages throughout a calendar year in the roots, stem (inner bark and xylem), branches and leaves, and scaled up to estimate changes in organ and whole-tree NSC pool sizes. Fine root and stem growth were also measured to compare the timing of growth processes with changes in NSC pools. KEY RESULTS: The whole-tree NSC pool increased from its spring minimum to its maximum at bud set, producing an average seasonal fluctuation of 0.96 kg per tree. This fluctuation represents a 72 % change in the whole-tree NSC pool, which greatly exceeds the relative change reported for more temperate conspecifics. At the organ level, branches accounted for roughly 48-60 % of the whole-tree NSC pool throughout the year, and their seasonal fluctuation was four to eight times greater than that observed in the stemwood, coarse roots and inner bark. CONCLUSIONS: Branches in boreal B. papyrifera were the largest and most dynamic storage pool, suggesting that storage changes at the branch level largely drive whole-tree storage dynamics in these trees. The greater whole-tree seasonal NSC fluctuation in boreal vs. temperate B. papyrifera may result from (1) higher soluble sugar concentration requirements in branches for frost protection, and/or (2) a larger reliance on reserves to fuel new leaf and shoot growth in the spring.
Authors: M Westhoff; H Schneider; D Zimmermann; S Mimietz; A Stinzing; L H Wegner; W Kaiser; G Krohne; St Shirley; P Jakob; E Bamberg; F-W Bentrup; U Zimmermann Journal: Plant Biol (Stuttg) Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 3.081
Authors: Morgan E Furze; Brett A Huggett; Catherine J Chamberlain; Molly M Wieringa; Donald M Aubrecht; Mariah S Carbone; Jennifer C Walker; Xiaomei Xu; Claudia I Czimczik; Andrew D Richardson Journal: Tree Physiol Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: T Hölttä; M D R Dominguez Carrasco; Y Salmon; J Aalto; A Vanhatalo; J Bäck; A Lintunen Journal: Plant Biol (Stuttg) Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.081
Authors: John P Bryant; Thomas P Clausen; Robert K Swihart; Simon M Landhäusser; Michael T Stevens; Christopher D B Hawkins; Suzanne Carrière; Andrei P Kirilenko; Alasdair M Veitch; Richard A Popko; David T Cleland; Joseph H Williams; Walter J Jakubas; Michael R Carlson; Karin Lehmkuhl Bodony; Merben Cebrian; Thomas F Paragi; Peter M Picone; Jeffrey E Moore; Edmond C Packee; Thomas Malone Journal: Am Nat Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 3.926