| Literature DB >> 34292434 |
J Almeida1, P Paiva2,3,4, N Ribeiro5, M Ferreira5,6, N António5,3,6, R Martins5, L Gonçalves5,6.
Abstract
Left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF) has been previously shown to accurately distinguish between patients with and without clearly defined left ventricle diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) by ASE/EACVI criteria, but indeterminate cases were excluded. We sought to determine if LAEF could accurately distinguish between normal, indeterminate and LVDD patients. A retrospective cohort of 125 patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography was studied. Comprehensive echocardiographic study was performed with measurement of validated diastolic parameters. Subjects were assigned LVDF ASE/EACVI categories. ANOVA test was used to compare means between groups and binary logistic regression and ROC curves to assess diagnostic accuracy. Mean LAEF was statistically different between groups (p < 0.001): 56.3% ± 4.5 for normal patients, 50.2% ± 5.5 for indeterminate patients and 44% ± 8.5 for patients with LVDD. LAEF distinguished LVDD from patients without diastolic dysfunction (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.65, p < 0.001) and ROC curve reveals excellent discriminative power (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.97, p < 0.001). LAEF also distinguished indeterminate patients from LVDD (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, p < 0.001) and ROC curve revealed good discriminative power (AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.82, p < 0.001). LAEF can accurately differentiate between normal, indeterminate and LVDD patients and could be considered as an additional parameter in the study of diastolic function.Entities:
Keywords: American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria; Left atrial ejection fraction; Left ventricle diastolic dysfunction
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34292434 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02357-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357