Ishta Sharma1. 1. St John's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Although the advent of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (cART) has greatly reduced the prevalence of HIV-Associated Dementia, the most severe form of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND), the incidence of the milder forms of HAND have risen. The explanations proposed include persistent central nervous system (CNS) viraemia and the neurotoxicity of chronic cART regimens. Nonetheless, controversies in HAND prevalence estimates, alongside a lack of consensus on the significance of CNS Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) have added to the complexity of elucidating the role of cART in HAND. The present review will evaluate the evidence underlying these explanations, as well as highlighting the need for improved trial designs and the incorporation of emerging biomarkers and neuroimaging tools. METHODS: A review of the current literature investigating cART neurotoxicity, controversies in HAND prevalence estimates, CNS Penetration Effectiveness, and neuroprotective adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, the inadequacy of cART in achieving complete preservation of the CNS underscores the imminent need for neuroprotective adjuvant therapies, where the efficacy of combining multiple adjuvant classes presents a potential therapeutic frontier which must be interrogated.
OBJECTIVES: Although the advent of Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (cART) has greatly reduced the prevalence of HIV-Associated Dementia, the most severe form of HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND), the incidence of the milder forms of HAND have risen. The explanations proposed include persistent central nervous system (CNS) viraemia and the neurotoxicity of chronic cART regimens. Nonetheless, controversies in HAND prevalence estimates, alongside a lack of consensus on the significance of CNS Penetration Effectiveness (CPE) have added to the complexity of elucidating the role of cART in HAND. The present review will evaluate the evidence underlying these explanations, as well as highlighting the need for improved trial designs and the incorporation of emerging biomarkers and neuroimaging tools. METHODS: A review of the current literature investigating cART neurotoxicity, controversies in HAND prevalence estimates, CNS Penetration Effectiveness, and neuroprotective adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Ultimately, the inadequacy of cART in achieving complete preservation of the CNS underscores the imminent need for neuroprotective adjuvant therapies, where the efficacy of combining multiple adjuvant classes presents a potential therapeutic frontier which must be interrogated.
Authors: Adonis Sfera; Karina G Thomas; Christina V Andronescu; Nyla Jafri; Dan O Sfera; Sarvin Sasannia; Carlos M Zapata-Martín Del Campo; Jose C Maldonado Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 5.152