Meat contains high nutritional components that could be utilized by humans to fulfill
their regular body requirements. Meat contains nutrition such as protein, vitamin B,
iron, and fat to improve the human health (Heinz and
Hautzinger, 2007). Amaral et al.
(2018) reported that fat play an important role of meat products since it
affected the flavor, tenderness, and juiciness of meat products. However, fat was
prone to be easily oxidized during processing and storage, resulting in the damage
of gastrointestinal tract. Total unsaturated fatty acids that lead to oxidation are
increased during storage time. These unstable double bonds of polyunsaturated fatty
acid can react with oxygen and lead to lipid oxidation (Min and Ahn, 2005). Pateiro et
al. (2015) have found that alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, lineal, and
other volatile compounds were increased during storage time, leading to changes of
flavor and aroma of dry-cured sausages.Currently, the food industry has focused on adding natural antioxidants and
antimicrobials from plants to meat products. Plant contents such as phenolics,
carotenoids, and vitamin can inhibit lipid oxidation by donating electrons and
suppressing reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Kalt,
2005). Imparted natural antioxidants such as rosemary extract could
reduce total bacteria of fresh beef sausage. The synergistic effect between rosemary
extract with mint extract increase the shelf life of beef sausage by preventing
microbial growth and inhibiting lipid oxidation during storage (Azizkhani and Tooryan, 2015). Burri et al. (2020) have examined antioxidant
abilities of various plants for preventing lipid oxidation and found that sea
buckthorn leaves, beet root, onion skin, savory, pine heartwood, olive powder,
rhubarb root, black currant leaves, and ramson bulb can significantly retard lipid
oxidation of sarcoplasmic protein meat model system from pork knuckle, during
storage for more than two weeks.Eggplant (EP) or brinjaleggplant (Solanum melongna L.) is a
vegetable that originally from Africa and domesticated in area between northeastern
India and southwestern China. However, nowadays EP were consumed in the world due to
the nutritional value of EP and low cost. Domestication of EP primarily involves the
expansion of fruit shape, size, and color diversity (Daunay et al., 2001). EP contains ascorbic acid, phenolic, and fiber at
around 59–129 g/100 g, 0.74–1.43 g/100 g, and 9–12 g/100 g,
respectively. It has various color such as purple, green, and white. Due to its high
contents of antioxidant compounds such as ascorbic acid, tyrosine, chlorogenic acid,
caffeic acid, and ferulic acid, EP could provide antioxidants for human health
(Hanson et al., 2006; Scorsatto et al., 2017). EP peel contains high
contents of anthocyanins that give different color to various EPs (Azuma et al., 2008). Various types of
delphinidin and nasunin compounds account for large portions of anthocyanins in the
peel of EP (Sadilova et al., 2006).Drying is one method that can be used to increase the shelf life of food. Removing
the moisture from food could inhibit the growth of spoilage microorganisms, thus
increasing the shelf-life (Ahmed et al.,
2013). Drying the African eggplant in oven-dryer (50°C, 60°C,
and 70°C) and freeze-dryer (−4°C) improved the ascorbic
equivalent antioxidant capacity of eggplant (Mbondo
et al., 2018). Martini et al.
(2021) reported that the total phenolic compounds and antioxidant
activity of dark purple eggplant were higher in cooking eggplant as compared to the
fresh eggplant. Drying eggplant using infrared method also improved the total
phenolic compounds, potassium, and color properties of eggplant (Jafari et al., 2020). However, the application
of the eggplant to the meat products were not widely studied. Therefore, the purpose
of this study was to evaluate antioxidant activities of EP powder using different
drying methods and its application to meat products with improved the shelf-life
during storage.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of eggplant powder
Eggplant (Solanum melongna) was purchased from a local market
(Gwangju, Korea). It was cut from the calyx, washed with water, sliced using a
knife to a round shape, and then dried using two different methods: oven drying
at 60°C and freeze-drying at −50°C until a constant weight
was reached. The EP was weighed after dried and put again in dry oven until
completely dried or freeze dryer for 2 wk and measure the weight every 1 h to
make sure that the EP were dried completely. If the weight of EP was constant
after continuous weighing, EP then ground using an Ultra-Power mixer (Hanil,
Gwangju, Korea). EP was sieved to two different particle sizes (<500
μm and <300 μm) using sievers (Daihan Scientific, Wonju,
Korea) to obtain uniform particles. EP powder was then stored at
−20°C until used.
Water and ethanol extracts of EP powder
EP powder (5 g) was weighed, added with 100 mL of double distilled (dd)-water,
and stirred using a stirrer for 8 h (Sukprasansap et al., 2019). The mixture was centrifuged at
1,500×g for 5 min, filtered using Whatman filter paper (# 41), and used
to analyze its antioxidant activity. For the different grade of ethanol
extraction, the ratio of EP powder extracted with edible ethanol were 1:20. EP
powder (10 g) was weighed and added with edible ethanol (200 mL) at different
concentrations (50%, 75%, and 100%). The mixture was then
stirred for 8 h and centrifuged at 1,500×g for 5 min. The supernatant was
filtered with Whatman filter paper (# 41). The filtrate was evaporated in a
rotary evaporator (Rotavapor 110, Hwashin Science, Gwangju, Korea) at
50°C to obtain EPethanol extract. Its antioxidant activity was then
analyzed.
DPPH radical-scavenging activity
The free radical scavenging activity of EP was measured using
2,2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical-scavenging assay according to
published method described by Huang et al.
(2005). Briefly, EP powders (0.1 g) with particle size and ethanol
extracts were diluted in methanol and centrifuged at 1,500×g for 5 min.
Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control and starch was used as a negative
control. Each sample was mixed with methanolic DPPH (0.2 mM) and kept in a dark
place for 20 min. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 517 nm with a UV
spectrophotometer (UV/VIS Spectrophotometer X-Ma 1200, Seoul, Korea).
Determination of total phenolics
Total phenolics in EP powder and ethanol extracts were measured using the method
described by Lin and Tang (2007).
Briefly, a standard curve was prepared using gallic acid at 0, 25, 50, 100, and
200 mg/L. Each sample (0.1 mL) was mixed with different concentrations of gallic
acid, dd-water (2.8 mL), 2% Na2CO3 (2 mL), and
50% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (0.1 mL). The mixture was then kept at room
temperature for 30 min and its absorbance was measured at 750 nm with a UV
spectrophotometer (UV/VIS Spectrophotometer X-Ma 1200, Seoul, Korea). Total
phenolics were expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g dried
powder.
Ferrous iron-chelating ability
Ferrous iron-chelating ability was measured according to the method of Le et al. (2007). EDTA was used as a
positive control. Briefly, 0.5 mL of each sample was mixed with 0.5 mL EDTA, 0.5
mL dd-water, 0.1 mL ferrous chloride, 0.9 mL methanol, and 0.1 mL ferrozine 5
mM. The mixture was then incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Its
absorbance was then measured at 562 nm with a UV Spectrophotometer.
Ferric reducing power ability
EP powder and ethanol extracts were diluted in dd-water to final concentrations
of 0.1%, 0.25%, 0.5%, and 1.0%. Each sample (2.5 mL)
was mixed with 2.5 mL of 200 mM phosphate buffer and 2.5 mL of 1%
potassium ferricyanide and incubated at 50°C in an oven for 20 min. The
mixture was then mixed with 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and
centrifuged at 1,500×g for 10 min. Then 2.5 mL of the supernatant of each
sample was mixed with 2.5 mL dd-water and 0.5 mL ferric chloride
(FeCl3) and kept at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance
of each sample was measured at 700 nm with a UV Spectrophotometer (UV/VIS
Spectrophotometer X-Ma 1200, Seoul, Korea) (Huang et al., 2005).
Regular sausage preparation
Pork meat and fat were purchased from a local market (Gwangju, Korea). Excessive
fat and connective tissues were trimmed. Ingredients of sausages were shown in
Table 1. Pork meat and fat were
ground using a grinder (Fujee Plant, Busan, Korea, M-12s) and mixed with
non-meat ingredients, then moved to a tube (50 mL) to have 40 g of sausages
batter per tube. The tube was then centrifuged at 1,500×g for 2 min,
boiled at 75°C in a water bath for 30 min, and cooled. After sausages
were removed from tubes, they were packaged under the vacuum and stored at
10°C for 35 days. Physicochemical properties and microbial counts of
sausages were analyzed at days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 35. The whole experiment
was replicated for three times.
Table 1.
Formulation of sausage added with eggplant powder in different drying
methods and level
Ingredients
(%)
Treatments
CTL
REF
O1
O2
F1
F2
Raw meat
60
60
60
60
60
60
Fat
20
20
20
20
20
20
Water ice
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
18.00
Salt
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
STPP
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
Sodium erythorbate
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
Cure blend
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
Ascorbic acid
-
0.10
-
-
-
-
Oven drying
-
-
0.25
0.50
-
-
Freeze drying
-
-
-
-
0.25
0.50
Total
100.00
100.10
100.25
100.50
100.25
100.50
CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze-dried eggplant powder.
CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze-dried eggplant powder.
Cooking loss, pH, and color
Cooking losses (CL, %) of sausages were determined by subtracting the
weight of the sausages before and after cooked. pH values were determined using
a pH meter (Mettle-Toledo, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland). Color values, including
lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*), were measured using a Minolta
color reader (Model # CR-10, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan).
TBARS (Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance)
TBARS values were determined using the method of Sinnhuber and Yu (1977). Briefly, 2 g of each sample was mixed with
3 mL of 2.5% TBA and 17 mL of 1% TCA, boiled at 90°C in a
water bath for 30 min, and cooled at room temperature. After cooling, 5 mL
supernatant of mixture solution was mixed with 5 mL chloroform and centrifuged
at 1,500×g for 5 min. Then 3 mL supernatant of chloroform solution was
mixed with 3 mL petroleum ether and centrifuged at 1,500×g for 10 min.
The absorbance of the sample was measured at 532 nm with a spectrophotometer
(UV/VIS Spectrophotometer X-Ma 1200, Seoul, Korea). The TBARS was calculated
based on the equation:
Microbial counts
Microbial counts were determined using total plate count (TPC) agar plates and
Enterobactericeae determined using violet red bile (VRB) agar
plates. Each sample (10 g) was mixed with 90 mL sterilized water using a
Stomacher (BigMixer, Interscience, Mourjou, France). After mixing, 0.1 mL sample
was spread to TPC and VRBagar plates and incubated at 37°C for 48 h.
Texture profile analysis (TPA)
Texture profile analysis (TPA) was determined using a Universal Testing Machine
(Model 3344, Canton, MA, USA). Each sample was cut into 13 mm in length and 12.5
mm in diameter and compressed with a 500-N load cell at a speed of 300 mm/min.
The compression ratio of samples was 70% of sample height. Hardness (gf),
springiness (cm), cohesiveness, gumminess and chewiness were analyzed for
TPA.
Proximate composition
Proximate compositions including moisture, fat, and protein of sausages were
determined as described by AOAC
(2005).
Expressible moisture (%)
Expressible moisture (EM) was measured by weighing samples (1.5 g) and three
pieces of a three-fourth Whatman filter paper (# 3). The sample was folded in a
thimble and centrifuged at 1,500×g for 15 min. The sample and thimble
were then weighed again after centrifugation. The EM was calculated with the
following formulation:where ΔW was the subtracted weight of thimble before and after
centrifugation, and A was the weight of the sample.
Statistical analysis
Data obtained from triplicates were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) using SPPS 21.0 program for Windows. Significant differences of means
among treatments and levels were determined using Duncan’s multiple range
test at p<0.05.
Results and Discussion
Antioxidant activity of eggplant
DPPH-RSA
DPPH radical-scavenging activities (RSA) of EP samples are shown in Figs. 1A and 1B. At 1% concentration of EP different particle
size, freeze-dried EP 500 μm had higher DPPH-RSA value than
oven-dried EP 500 μm, however particle size did not affect the
DPPH-RSA values of EP. As compared to the different ethanol levels,
freeze-dried EP extracted with 75% and 100% ethanol had higher
DPPH radical-scavenging activity (p<0.05) than extracted with
0% and 50% ethanol. The DPPH-RSA of EPwater extract was lower
than other extracts (p<0.05). The DPPH-RSA was increased with an
increasing concentration of EP powder. DPPH ranged from
46.2%–98.1% for EP with different particle sizes and
0.36%–94.7% for EPs extracted with different solvents,
Sukprasansap et al. (2019) have
also reported that the DPPH-RSA of freeze-dried EP ranges from 25.10%
to 91.60% for six different EPs. Higher DPPH-RSA of EP might protect
the human body from oxidative damage known to cause disorders or
non-communicable disease. Cai et al.
(2020) have found that DPPH of citrus peel was higher in sieved
powder with higher particle sizes (500–710 μm) than with small
particle sizes (125–500 μm). Lower antioxidants in smaller
particle size might be due to cell damage during grinding and more phenolic
contents eluted during processing. Ekin et
al. (2017) have stated that DPPH-RSA of Crataegus
meyeri ethanol extract was higher than that of its water
extract. These results indicated that ethanol extract can inhibit the
formation of free radical better than water. In this study, increased the
concentration of ethanol increasing the antioxidant activity of EP, however
particle size of EP did not affect the activity of antioxidants.
Fig. 1.
2,2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl radical-scavenging assay of eggplant
powder with different particle sizes (A), different solvent extracts
(B), phenolic content of eggplant powder with different particle
sizes (C) and different solvents for extraction (D).
a–e Means with different superscript among
treatments are significantly different at p<0.05. AA,
ascorbic acid; OD 500 μm, oven-dried <500 μm;
OD 300 μm, oven dried <300 μm; FD 500
μm, freeze-dried <500 μm; FD 300 μm,
freeze dried <300 μm, OD 0, oven-dried water extract;
OD 50, oven dried 50% ethanol extract; OD 75, oven dried
75% ethanol extract; OD 100, oven dried 100% ethanol
extract; FD 0, freeze-dried water extract; FD 50, freeze-dried
50% ethanol extract; FD 75, freeze-dried 75% ethanol
extract; FD 100, freeze-dried 100% ethanol extract.
2,2-diphenyl-1picrylhydrazyl radical-scavenging assay of eggplant
powder with different particle sizes (A), different solvent extracts
(B), phenolic content of eggplant powder with different particle
sizes (C) and different solvents for extraction (D).
a–e Means with different superscript among
treatments are significantly different at p<0.05. AA,
ascorbic acid; OD 500 μm, oven-dried <500 μm;
OD 300 μm, oven dried <300 μm; FD 500
μm, freeze-dried <500 μm; FD 300 μm,
freeze dried <300 μm, OD 0, oven-dried water extract;
OD 50, oven dried 50% ethanol extract; OD 75, oven dried
75% ethanol extract; OD 100, oven dried 100% ethanol
extract; FD 0, freeze-dried water extract; FD 50, freeze-dried
50% ethanol extract; FD 75, freeze-dried 75% ethanol
extract; FD 100, freeze-dried 100% ethanol extract.
Total phenolic content (TPC)
As shown in Figs. 1C and 1D, TPCc of EPs were not different by
particle size or drying method. However, they were different by solvent used
for extraction. Freeze-dried EP extracted with 100% ethanol (FD 100)
had a higher value of TPC than those of extracted with 75%,
50%, and 0% of ethanol. EP extracted with 75% ethanol
had higher values than extracted with 0% and 50% ethanol.
Ferarsa et al. (2018) have also
reported that TPC in EPwater extract was lower than that in EPethanol
extract or EP extracted with a combination of ethanol and water. TPC ranged
from 0.02–1.99 mg GAE/g in this study. Such differences in TPC were
partially due to differences of polarity among solvents. Phenolic contents
of various plants were affected by chemicals of plants and polarities of
solvents used. Extraction of plants with a solvent could remove non-phenolic
content of plants such as sugar and fat (Dai
and Mumper, 2010). Sun et al.
(2015) have stated that propolis extracted by ethanol or ethanol
mixed water had higher antioxidants than that extracted with water alone.
Ethanol and ethanol mixed water can extract bioactive compounds of plants
with a high polarity. Therefore, higher concentration of ethanol increased
the TPC of EP in this study.
Iron chelating ability (ICA)
Results of iron chelating ability (ICA) were shown in Figs. 2A and 2B.
ICA values were increased with increasing concentration of EP. ICA values of
EP powder with different particle sizes and drying methods were not
different (p>0.05) from each other. With different concentration of
ethanol, freeze dried EP extracted with 75% and 50% ethanol
had higher value than water extract and 100% ethanol extract at level
1% of EP. In oven-dried EP, different concentration of ethanol did
not affect the ICA of EP. Boulekbache-Makhlouf et al. (2013) have reported that iron
chelating activity of EP peel ranges from 3.71% to 18.53% in
EP extracted with 70% methanol, ethanol, and acetone. These results
indicated that EP powder might prevent oxidation and interrupted the
formation of radical hydroxyl from ferrozine-Fe2+ known to
cause oxidation in food. Emanue et al.
(2011) have reported that antioxidant activity of Artichoke
(Cynara scolymus) was increased when the level of
ethanol used for extraction was increased. The antioxidant content in
Cynara scolymus was higher when it was extracted with
75% ethanol, but lower when it was extracted with 97% ethanol.
Similar results were found in the present study, showing that mixture of
ethanol and water affected the antioxidant activity of freeze-dried EP,
however, did not affect the ICA of oven dried EP.
Fig. 2.
Iron chelating activities of eggplant powder with different
particle sizes (A), different solvent extracts (B), reducing power
activities of eggplant powder with different particle sizes (C) and
different solvent extracts (D).
a–d Means with different superscript among
treatments are significantly different at p<0.05. AA,
ascorbic acid; OD 500 μm, oven-dried <500 μm;
OD 300 μm, oven dried <300 μm; FD 500
μm, freeze-dried <500 μm; FD 300 μm,
freeze dried <300 μm, OD 0, oven-dried water extract;
OD 50, oven dried 50% ethanol extract; OD 75, oven dried
75% ethanol extract; OD 100, oven dried 100% ethanol
extract; FD 0, freeze-dried water extract; FD 50, freeze-dried
50% ethanol extract; FD 75, freeze-dried 75% ethanol
extract; FD 100, freeze-dried 100% ethanol extract.
Iron chelating activities of eggplant powder with different
particle sizes (A), different solvent extracts (B), reducing power
activities of eggplant powder with different particle sizes (C) and
different solvent extracts (D).
a–d Means with different superscript among
treatments are significantly different at p<0.05. AA,
ascorbic acid; OD 500 μm, oven-dried <500 μm;
OD 300 μm, oven dried <300 μm; FD 500
μm, freeze-dried <500 μm; FD 300 μm,
freeze dried <300 μm, OD 0, oven-dried water extract;
OD 50, oven dried 50% ethanol extract; OD 75, oven dried
75% ethanol extract; OD 100, oven dried 100% ethanol
extract; FD 0, freeze-dried water extract; FD 50, freeze-dried
50% ethanol extract; FD 75, freeze-dried 75% ethanol
extract; FD 100, freeze-dried 100% ethanol extract.
Reducing power
Figs. 2C and 2D shown the reducing power of EP powder in different
particle size and concentration of ethanol. Oven-dried EP powder with 300
and 500 μm particle size had higher values than freeze-dried EP (2C).
The reducing power of EP was gradually increased with increasing level of
EP. In EP different solvent extract, extracting EP with 75% and
100% ethanol had higher reducing power than extracted with 0%
and 50% ethanol (2D). The reducing power value was
0.09%–1.95%. Reducing power value of EPethanol extract
was higher than that of water extract. Sukprasansap et al. (2019) have reported that the reducing power
ranges from 228.7 to 1,260 μmol TE/g for six different types of
freeze-dried EP extracted with 80% methanol. Nisha et al. (2009) have stated that total reducing
power was increased with increasing concentration of EP. Reducing power
means transformation from Fe3+ to Fe2+
at low pH by antioxidant compounds of plants. Such transformation involves
donation of electrons by phenolic compounds to free radicals to protect
cells against damage caused by oxidation. Increasing the concentration of
ethanol increased the reducing power activity of EP and drying the EP in
oven had higher values than freeze-dried EP regardless the particle size of
EP.
Characteristics of pork sausages
pH and color value
There was no interaction between treatment and storage time in pH and color,
therefore data were expressed by storage time in a treatment or treatment in
a storage time (Table 2). pH values
of sausages added with EP were not different among treatments and during
storage times (p>0.05). Thus, adding EP did not affect the pH of meat
products. Pintado et al. (2018)
reported the addition of chia and oat in fresh sausage did not affect the pH
of sausages during storage time.
Table 2.
pH and color values of sausages added with eggplant powder in
different drying methods and level
pH
Color L*
Color a*
Color b*
Treatments
CTL
6.13±0.09[ab]
70.5±1.54[ab]
9.01±0.77[a]
6.88±0.67[b]
REF
6.09±0.09[b]
70.8±1.14[a]
9.08±0.56[a]
6.87±0.51[b]
O1
6.16±0.09[a]
69. 5±0.84[ab]
8.53±0.57[b]
7.05±0.54[ab]
O2
6.16±0.10[a]
69.1±2.24[ab]
7.38±0.71[b]
7.20±0.67[ab]
F1
6.15±0.10[a]
69.7±0.77[ab]
7.63±0.57[b]
6.97±0.74[ab]
F2
6.15±0.10[a]
66.7±0.67[b]
6.80±0.73[c]
7.32±0.63[a]
Days
0
6.09±0.06[C]
70.0±1.11[A]
8.27±1.00[AB]
6.94±0.42[B]
3
6.23±0.05[A]
69.2±2.47[A]
8.03±1.17[B]
6.91±0.46[B]
7
6.09±0.06[C]
66.9±1.44[A]
8.20±0.97[AB]
6.82±0.46[B]
14
6.18±0.12[B]
70.0±1.15[A]
8.50±0.85[A]
6.80±0.27[B]
21
6.07±0.04[C]
69.7±1.06[A]
8.20±1.10[AB]
6.75±0.31[B]
28
6.22±0.10[AB]
70.1±1.13[A]
7.49±1.30[C]
7.65±1.07[A]
35
6.10±0.06[C]
69.9±1.06[A]
7.80±0.95[BC]
7.46±0.56[A]
Means with different superscript among treatments are different
at p<0.05.
Means with different superscript among storage days are different
at p<0.05.
CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze-dried eggplant powder.
Means with different superscript among treatments are different
at p<0.05.Means with different superscript among storage days are different
at p<0.05.CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze-dried eggplant powder.Lightness (L*) values of sausages added with 0.25% and 0.5%
oven and freeze-dried EP tended to be lower than sausages without EP.
However, these values were not changed during storage. Redness (a*) values
was higher in the control and reference, with F2 had the lower redness (a*)
value, which was decreased with increasing storage time. Yellowness (b*)
value was higher for sausages added with 0.25% and 0.5% oven
and freeze-dried EP powder. They were increased toward the end of storage
(Table 2). Different color values
of sausages added with EP powder might be due to the presence of
anthocyanins in the EP powder. The content of anthocyanin in EP peel was
about 80–850 mg/kg (Azuma et al.,
2008). Yellowness value was higher for sausages added with EP due
to the presence of carotenoid compound in EP. However, they were decreased
during cooking. Kim and Chin (2013)
have also reported that lightness values of sausages added with tomato
powder were increased and color values were decreased during storage time
except for lightness. This was due to the pigment content of tomato. Thus,
pigment of EP affected the color properties of sausages during storage
time.
Proximate analysis
As shown in Table 3, moisture contents
(%) of sausages were not different between treatments, however
decreased during storage time. Moisture contents (%) in this study
ranged from 64.1%–66.4%. Yang et al. (2010) reported there was no different
between low-fat sausages added with hydrated oatmeal and without hydrated
oatmeal. Moisture contents (%) of sausages added with EP powder
ranged from 60.36% to 61.46%. Fat contents (%) of
sausages added with EP were lower (p<0.05) than those of control and
reference sausages. However, they were increased (p<0.05) during
storage time due to loss of moisture. Fat contents (%) ranged from
17.23% to 18.96 %, with sausages added with chitosan having
the lowest fat content (Alirezalu et al.,
2019). Sausages containing EP powder did not different
(p>0.05) in protein content compared to the control. Protein contents
did not change during storage time (p>0.05). Protein contents
(%) in the study of Powell et al.
(2019) were similar to results of the present study, showing no
significant difference between treatment groups. They reported that protein
contents (%) of sausages added with citrus fiber were approximately
12%. In this study, adding EP did not affect the proximate
compositions of sausages.
Table 3.
Proximate analysis of sausages added with eggplant powder in
different drying methods and level
Moisture (%)
Fat (%)
Protein (%)
Treatments
CTL
64.4±1.26[a]
18.8±1.06[a]
14.6±0.48[b]
REF
64.5±1.36[bc]
19.1±1.09[a]
15.2±0.38[a]
O1
65.3±1.39[abc]
18.0±1.61[b]
14.6±1.01[b]
O2
65.3±1.47[ab]
17.8±1.79[b]
15.3±1.22[a]
F1
65.5±1.46[a]
17.7±1.51[b]
14.9±0.68[ab]
F2
65.5±1.53[a]
17.4±1.51[b]
15.4±0.79[a]
Days
0
66.4±1.61[A]
17.3±1.87[C]
14.7±0.59[A]
3
65.7±1.37[AB]
17.3±1.49[C]
15.2±1.03[A]
7
64.5±1.40[CD]
18.5±1.28[AB]
15.1±0.73[A]
14
65.2±1.38[BC]
17.9±1.35[BC]
15.0±0.69[A]
21
65.4±1.16[B]
17.9±1.16[BC]
15.0±0.57[A]
28
64.1±0.87[D]
18.7±1.75[AB]
15.1±1.06[A]
35
64.2±0.99[D]
19.4±0.82[A]
14.9±0.70[A]
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.
Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.
CTL, control without antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze dried eggplant powder.
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.CTL, control without antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze dried eggplant powder.
Purge loss (PL), expressible moisture (EM, %), and violet red bile
(VRB) of pork model sausage
PLs, EM, and VRB values were shown in Table
4. PL values of sausages added with 0.5% freeze-dried EP
powder were lower than those of other sausages. PLs ranged from 3.89%
to 4.71%, showing no significant change during storage. PLs of
control sausages were higher than those of other treatments due to lower
protein content in the control. Lower protein content in meat or meat
product could increase water loss. EP contains high protein contents that
could retain water during storage (Lonergan
et al., 2001). Adding EP to sausage did not affect the EM
(%) of sausages, although EM was decreased (p<0.05) during
storage time due to protein denaturation with increasing storage time. Water
holding capacity was a crucial factor affecting the tenderness, juiciness,
and flavor of meat products (Adıbelli
and Serdaroglu, 2017). VRBagar plates were used to determine the
number of coliform bacteria. In this study, VRB counts were not
(p>0.05) different among sausages, although they were increased
during storage. These results indicate that antioxidants could inhibit the
growth of Enterobactericiae in sausages.
Table 4.
Expressible moisture and purge loss of sausages added with
eggplant powder in different drying methods and level
Expressible moisture
(%)
Purge loss (%)
VRB (Log CFU/g)
Treatments
CTL
17.3±3.75[a]
4.71±0.90[a]
<2[a]
REF
17.1±2.60[a]
4.63±1.34[a]
<2[b]
O1
17.2±2.44[a]
4.50±1.30[ab]
<2[ab]
O2
16.9±2.45[a]
4.20±1.07[ab]
<2[ab]
F1
17.2±1.92[a]
4.32±1.18[ab]
<2[ab]
F2
16.6±2.02[a]
3.89±0.90[b]
<2[ab]
Days
0
17.8±1.42[AB]
3.08±0.90[B]
<2[C]
3
17.9±2.65[AB]
4.13±0.74[A]
<2[C]
7
18.3±3.07[A]
4.51±0.90[A]
<2[C]
14
17.7±2.41[AB]
4.82±0.41[A]
<2[C]
21
16.3±1.93[BC]
4.51±0.98[A]
<2[C]
28
15.8±2.49[C]
4.77±0.21[A]
2.13[AB]
35
15.7±2.55[C]
4.83±0.81[A]
2.97[A]
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.
Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.
VRB, violet red bile; CTL, control without antioxidants; REF,
sausage mixed with 0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed
with 0.25% oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed
with 0.5% oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed
with 0.25% freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage
mixed with 0.5% freeze dried eggplant powder.
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.VRB, violet red bile; CTL, control without antioxidants; REF,
sausage mixed with 0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed
with 0.25% oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed
with 0.5% oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed
with 0.25% freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage
mixed with 0.5% freeze dried eggplant powder.
Texture profile analysis of pork sausages
TPA was performed based on hardness, springiness, gumminess, chewiness, and
cohesiveness. In this study, the hardness value was higher for sausages
added with EP powder. It was increased with increasing level of EP powder
added. The lowest hardness value was found for sausages added with ascorbic
acid (Table 5). Sausages added with
0.5% EP had higher hardness values than control sausages.
Springiness, gumminess, chewiness, and cohesiveness were not different by
treatment or storage time. Powell et al.
(2019) have also reported that hardness values of sausages added
with citrus fiber as a natural replacer were increased with increasing level
of citrus powder added and that springiness, gumminess, and chewiness were
not changed during storage. Uthumporn et al.
(2016) have shown that EP powder had high crude fiber content at
15.66–15.77 g/100 g, including insoluble fiber (25.31–28.01
g/100 g), soluble fiber (11.86–12.28 g/100 g), and total dietary
fiber (37.18–40.97 g/100 g).
Table 5.
Texture profile analysis of sausages added with eggplant powder
in different drying methods and level
Hardness
Springiness
Gumminess
Chewiness
Cohesiveness
Treatments
CTL
3,516±939[ab]
5.33±1.21[a]
24.9±4.88[a]
108±14.8[a]
0.01[a]
REF
2,973±746[b]
5.18±0.67[a]
21.8±8.76[a]
110±16.2[a]
0.01[a]
O1
3,429±956[ab]
5.44±1.02[a]
25.2±6.10[a]
134±13.3[a]
0.01[a]
O2
3,607±958[a]
5.27±0.94[a]
26.1±4.57[a]
125±13.8[a]
0.01[a]
F1
3,418±778[ab]
5.48±0.64[a]
22.1±8.38[a]
121±16.0[a]
0.01[a]
F2
3,739±939[a]
5.34±0.96[a]
28.0±8.11[a]
135±12.5[a]
0.01[a]
Days
0
2,648±486[C]
5.14±0.85[AB]
24.9±7.11[A]
122±17.7[A]
0.01[A]
3
3,048±620[BC]
4.90±1.13[B]
30.0±8.91[A]
132±13.2[A]
0.01[A]
7
3,238±648[BC]
5.17±0.71[AB]
23.5±5.31[A]
121±15.2[A]
0.01[A]
14
3,624±728[AB]
5.54±0.76[AB]
22.5±5.42[A]
122±13.8[A]
0.01[A]
21
3,919±851[A]
5.26±0.80[AB]
25.9±3.48[A]
120±14.9[A]
0.01[A]
28
4,001±926[A]
5.70±0.93[A]
23.0±5.20[A]
137±17.5[A]
0.01[A]
35
3,651±991[AB]
5.68±0.88[A]
22.8±3.90[A]
104±15.4[A]
0.01[A]
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.
Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.
CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze dried eggplant powder.
Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05.Means with different superscript among storage days are
significantly different at p<0.05.CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF, sausage mixed with
0.1% ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
oven dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
oven dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with 0.25%
freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with 0.5%
freeze dried eggplant powder.
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values of pork
sausages
As shown in Fig. 3A, TBARS values
increased with increasing storage time (p<0.05). Increasing the level
of EP powder added to sausages decreased their TBARS values. This result
indicated that the addition of EP could retard lipid oxidation during
storage. In this present study, O2 sausages (0.5% oven-dried EP) had
lower TBA values than others (Fig. 3A).
Ruban et al. (2009) have found
that there was an interaction between treatment and storage time for TBARS
values of sausages added with potato and tapioca flour. TBARS values were
increased during storage time (30 days). Sausages added with potato flour
showed better inhibition of lipid oxidation than those added with tapioca
flour. Kumar et al. (2015) have
declared that plants have antioxidants such as tocopherols, flavonoids, and
phenolic that could suppress lipid oxidation. The antioxidant activity of EP
can be partitioned into different phases of the food matrix. Flavonoids
usually transfer hydrogens to make free radical reactions ineffective and
stabilize the reaction of lipid oxidation (Mbah et al., 2019). Gürbüz et al. (2018) have reported that EP had
high contents of phenolic acids such as flavonoid, hydroxycinnamic acids
(HCA), and anthocyanin.
Fig. 3.
TBARS values (A) and total plate counts of sausages (B).
a-e Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05. TBARS, thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances; CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF,
sausage mixed with ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with
0.25% oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with
0.5% oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with
0.25% freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with
0.5% freeze-dried eggplant powder.
TBARS values (A) and total plate counts of sausages (B).
a-e Means with different superscript among treatments are
significantly different at p<0.05. TBARS, thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances; CTL, control without adding antioxidants; REF,
sausage mixed with ascorbic acid; O1, sausage mixed with
0.25% oven-dried eggplant powder; O2, sausage mixed with
0.5% oven-dried eggplant powder; F1, sausage mixed with
0.25% freeze-dried eggplant powder; F2, sausage mixed with
0.5% freeze-dried eggplant powder.
Total plate count (TPC)
As shown in Fig. 3B, total microbial
counts increased during storage time, with the reference (ascorbic acid)
having the highest ability to inhibit the growth of bacteria. Control
without adding any EP had higher total bacteria counts than other treatments
during storage time, ranging from 2.57 Log CFU/g on day 3 to 5.93 Log CFU/g
on day 35. Furthermore, total bacteria count could not be detected for
reference sausages on day 3. Total bacterial count was 2.11 Log CFU/g on day
7 and 4.5 Log CFU/g at the end of storage time. AL-Janabi et al. (2010) have reported that plants have
antimicrobial activities, especially fruits and roots of purple EP. They
found that EP fruits could inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli,
Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris, Bacillus
subtilis, and skin pathogenic fungi. The George Mateljan Foundation (2009) has stated that
nasunin and glycoalkaloids of EP could work as antioxidants and
antimicrobial agents to protect animal tissues from oxidation.
Conclusion
EP powder could be used as a natural antioxidant in food products. In this study, EP
powder was found to possess high antioxidant activities based on analysis results of
DPPH-RSA, total phenolic content, ICA, and reducing power. The addition of EP powder
at 0.5% improved texture properties of sausages. In addition, EP powder
extended the shelf-life of sausage by retarding the lipid oxidation process and
inhibiting microbial growth. Compared to freeze-drying, oven-dried EP powder added
at 0.5% was effective in extending the shelf-life of sausages.
Authors: Stina C M Burri; Anders Ekholm; Uko Bleive; Tõnu Püssa; Martin Jensen; Jarkko Hellström; Sari Mäkinen; Risto Korpinen; Pirjo H Mattila; Vitalijs Radenkovs; Dalija Segliņa; Åsa Håkansson; Kimmo Rumpunen; Eva Tornberg Journal: Meat Sci Date: 2019-12-12 Impact factor: 5.209