Milk is made of milk fats, proteins, carbohydrates, water-soluble vitamins, minerals,
and water. The whey protein and a casein exists as protein components. Casein is
major component of milk proteins and it is widely studied because it has high
availability and nutritional importance. It is about 3% in milk and it is
about 80% of all protein in milk. Also, casein protein consisted of
beta-casein fragments and molecular weight is about 75,000–375,000 kDa (Chio et al., 2011).In recent years, calcium intake has increased, but its utilization in the body is
low, leading to various deficiency diseases. Lack of calcium is the cause of various
diseases such as poor bone growth, fracture, osteoporosis, hypercholesterolosis,
arteriosclerosis, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (Raisz and Smith, 1989; Zhao et al.,
2005). In order to increase calcium intake, the use of calcium in the
body should be higher than that of eating large amounts (Greger, 1988).It has been reported that casein itself affects calcium absorption (Bronner, 1987), affecting immune system, so, it
affects final immune response and cellular function (Coste and Tome, 1991; Kayser and Meisel,
1996).Casein protein is characterized with a type of amino acid constituents. The use of
casein hydrolysates that retain the bioactive amino acid domain or sequence may be a
better alternative to prevent rancidity in foods without affecting food quality
(Díaz and Decker, 2004). Also, the
enzymatic hydrolysis of casein may act in a body as regulatory components with a
hormone activity which can modulate specific physiological functions (Meisel and FitzGerald, 2003).In vitro and in vivo enzymatic proteolysis of
casein proteins produce bioactive peptides (Jelen
and Lutz, 1998), which have specific biological functions throughout
their ability to affect cellular function (Meisel,
1997). Because casein phosphopeptide (CPP) have a potential effects to
deliver calcium as a functional ingredient (Kitts
and Yuan, 1992). It is important to examine their immunological activity
further. In response to this, 32 articles examining the role of hydrolyzed infant
formulas in the prevention of allergies have been investigated (Hays, 2006).Through this, if casein is hydrolyzed using proteolytic enzyme to develop a specific
peptide similar with CPP, superior calcium absorption and anti-inflammatory effects
will be expected.In addition, researchers at the Department of Pediatric Gastrointestinal and
Nutrition at Johns Hopkins of Medicine reported that infants fed with totally
hydrolyzed casein and infants had a reduced incidence of atopic disease during the
five years of life. Also, casein hydrolysates have been reported that it has a
biological function on cellular function (Meisel,
1997), and it affects immune system cells (Coste and Tome, 1991; Kayser and Meisel,
1996).Analysis of bioactive peptides has been made in several studies. These peptide
sequences, encrypted within proteins, are liberated in vivo during
gastrointestinal digestion or in vitro by fermentation with
proteolytic starter cultures or using proteases. BAP generally comprises 2–20
amino acid residues (Poosapati et al.,
2018).In this regard, the objective of this study is development of a specific peptide
which have a similar effect with CPP and researchinga of peptide which has excellent
physiological properties and promotes calcium absorption.
Materials and Methods
Preparation of casein hydrolysates
Commercial casein (95% protein) obtained from Meggle food Ingredients
(Wasserburg, Germany).A 10% casein solution prepared by mixing 10% casein and 90%
0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). After a sterilization for 10 min at
90°C, a pH is adjusted to 7.0 which is optimum active pH of the enzyme
with 1 N NaOH (Sigma, St. Louise, MO, USA).Commercial enzymes used with Alcalase® 2.4 L FG (Protease from
Bacillus licheniformis, 5 U/g), Neutrase®
0.8 L (Protease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, 0.8 U/g),
Protamex® (Protease from Bacillus sp.,
1.5 U/g) and Flavourzyme® (Protease from Aspergillus
oryzae, 500 U/g). All commercial enzymes purchased from
Novozymes™ (Bagsvaerd, Denmark).The enzymes added at a ratio of 1:200 (w/v) based on the substrate, and shaken at
120 rpm in a shaking water bath at 50°C. The samples taken at 30 min and
inactivate the enzymes at 90°C for 10 min. It preceded to 240 min. After
a cooling at 20°C, the supernatant collected by centrifugation for 20 min
under conditions of 4,000×g and 4°C. The supernatant was filtered
with PVDF 0.22 Syringe membrane filter (Futecs, Daejeon, Korea). Samples stored
at –20°C and used for each experiment.
Degree of hydrolysis (DH) of casein hydrolysates
The hydrolysis degree of casein hydrolysates measured using the Lowry method
(Lowry, 1951). The Lowry solution A
and B prepared for the degree of hydrolysis (DH). To prepare solution A,
1% cupric sulfate (Sigma) and 2% Sodium potassium tartrate (Sigma)
mixed at a 1:1 ratio (v/v), and 1.0 mL of the mixed solution and 50 mL of
2% Na2CO3 (DaeJung Chemical & Metals,
Siheung, Korea) were mixed. Solution B used to prepare a 1 N Folin-Ciocalteau
reagent (Sigma).First, 1.0 mL of casein hydrolysates and the same amount of 20% TCA
(Duksan Chemical, Ansan, Korea) mixed and maintained for 1 h to precipitate
20% TCA soluble protein. It centrifuged at 11,000×g for 20 min.
The supernatant and dissolved residue removed in 5.0 mL of 0.1 N NaOH
(Sigma).Thereafter, 1.0 mL of a casein hydrolysates and 5.0 mL of solution A mixed and
reacted at room temperature for 10 min. After that, 0.5 mL of solution B added
and the contents mixed immediately with vortex mixer. After reacting for 30 min,
an absorbance measured at 600 nm. An equivalent amount of protein calculated
from standard curve prepared using bovineserum albumin (Sigma). A bovine serum
albumin measured in the range of 20 to 200 μg/mL.The amount of TCA soluble protein measured and calculated by the following
equation.
Purification of casein hydrolysates
In order to obtain peptide fractions from casein hydrolysates, gel filtration
throughout a preparative chromatography system performed (Waters, Milford, MA,
USA).Peptides that identified in SDS-PAGE separated on a preparative scale for further
study. The preparative pump (Waters) and preparative liquid chromatography W600
(Waters) used with a Dual λ Absorbance detector W2487 (Waters) and W717
Autosampler (Waters).The casein hydrolysates dissolved in 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer with 0.15 M
NaCl (Sigma), pH 7.0. It filtered with a PVDF 0.45 μm sterile syringe
membrane filter (Futecs). After that, casein hydrolysates is loaded 3.0 mL
throughout a Hiprep 16/60 Sephacryl S-100 HR column (GE Healthcare Life
Sciences, Marlborough, MA, USA) and eluted at flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. A
detector was set at 280 nm.All fractions obtained throughout a gel filtration with Hiprep 16/60 Sephacryl
S-100 HR column on preparative chromatography system collected and fractions
stored at –20°C (Table
1).
Table 1.
Condition of preparative liquid chromatography system
Instrument
Condition
Column
Hiprep 16/60 Sephacryl S-100 HR
column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences)
Mobile phase
5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (0.15 M
NaCl, pH 7.0)
Detector (Detection)
Waters Dual λ Absorbance
Detector W2487 (280 nm)
Flow rate
1 mL/min
Injection volume
3 mL
Calcium solubilization ability
In the experiment of promoting calcium absorption, the method of Naito (1986) and Yamamoto et al. (1994) was slightly modified to measure the
effect on precipitation in solution after calcium phosphate formation.The 10 mM calcium chloride (Sigma) and 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer were
prepared. After that, 0.5 mL of 10 mM calcium chloride and 0.5 mL of casein
hydrolysate fraction samples mixed. And a 1.0 mL of 20 mM sodium phosphate
buffer added. The mixed solution incubated at 37°C for 2 h and
centrifuged at 2,000×g for 30 min at 25°C.Calcium solubility measured using calcium colorimetric kit (Gene Tex, Pkwy
Irvine, CA, USA) for the whole solution and the supernatant collected after
centrifugation.The whole solution and supernatant samples dispensed into each 10 μL 96
well plate, followed by mixing of chromogenic reagent to 90 μL and
calcium assay buffer to 60 μL. After reacting for 5 min in dark room at
room temperature, an absorbance measured at 570 nm.Calcium concentration calculated according to the first equation below, and
calcium solubility calculated according to the second equation below. All
protein concentration of casein hydrolysate fraction samples were 200
μg/mL.*Sa = Sample amount from standard curve*Sv = Sample volume
Cytotoxicity of casein hydrolysate fractions (MTT assay)
RAW 264.7 cell is a macrophage cell of mouse. RAW 264.7 cells obtained from the
Dankook University (Cheonan, Korea). Cells grown in Dulbecco’s Modified
Eagle Medium (DMEM) including 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum
(FBS). The incubator temperature adjusted to 37°C and maintained at
5% CO2.RAW 264.7 cells seeded in 96-well cell culture plates at a density of
5×104 cells/well and incubated for 16–18 h. After
removing the medium, RAW 264.7 cells treated with various concentrations of
fraction samples for 20–22 h.After that, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra zolium bromide (Sigma)
solution added to each well at a final concentration of 5 mg/mL and incubated
(37°C, 5% CO2). After 2–3 h, culture
supernatants removed, and 100 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma) added to
each well to completely and dissolve formazan crystals. The absorbance measured
at 540 nm (Fotakis and Timbrell,
2006).
Measurements of nitric oxide (NO assay)
RAW 264.7 cells seeded in 96-well cell culture plates at a density of
5×104 cells/well and incubated for 16–18 h. The
amount of nitric oxide (NO) calculated by measuring the amount of nitrite, an
oxidized product, in the cell culture supernatants as previously explained.
After removing the medium, RAW 264.7 cells treated with various concentrations
of fraction samples in medium for 2–3 h.After that, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with final concentration of 100 ng/mL
treated and stimulated at the same volume in medium for 20–22 h. A Griess
reagent added to the supernatant in a ratio of 1:1 (v/v). The absorbance at 540
nm measured in a microplate reader after 15 min at room temperature (Lim, 2010).
Measurement of cytokine (ELISA)
RAW 264.7 cells seeded in 96-well plates at a concentration of
5×104 cells/mL for 24 h, preprocessed cell free extracts
were prepared. After that, the supernatant taken and the cytokine content
measured by a Mouse IL-1α, IL-6 and Mouse TNF-α ELISA kit
(Komabiotech, Seoul, Korea) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
(ELISA).The 100 μL of fraction samples added to each well coated with specific
antibodies against cytokines (IL-1α, IL-6, and TNF-α), reacted at
room temperature for 2 h. And the supernatant removed and washed five times with
washing buffer. Thereafter, detection antibody added to react with antibody.
Also, streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated with avidin added and
reacted at room temperature for 30 min. After that, it washed for 4 times. A 100
μL of Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) added to each well as a substrate. After
that, it incubates at the room temperature as a proper color development. A stop
solution added to each well and absorbance measured at 450 nm (Phelan et al., 2009).
Profiling of amino acids (AccQ-Tag system)
Amino acid profiling preceded according to Waters amino acid analysis AccQ-Tag
manual. A waters AccQ-Tag·Fluor reagent kit used for a derivatization of
the sample and standard. An amino acid standard (Sigma) used as a standard. The
range of sample amount is 0.02–0.08 μg (20–1,000 pmol).
Others system condition shown in Table 2
which showed in below.
Table 2.
Profiling of amino acids (AccQ-Tag system)
Instrument
Condition
Column
Waters AccQ-Tag (Waters)
Mobile phase
Waters AccQ-Tag eluent A, 60%
Acetonitrile (pH 5.02)
Detector (detection)
Waters Dual λ Absorbance
Detector W2487 (280 nm)
Flow rate
1 mL/min
Injection volume
10 μL
Results
The degree of casein hydrolysis defined as the percentage of total number of
peptide bonds in a protein that has been cleaved during hydrolysis (Adler-Nissen, 1986). The DH of the four
enzymes tended to increase into a similar pattern. There was no significant
difference from 150 min and after increasing from 120 min to 150 min. Among
them, the highest DH of the casein hydrolyzed by Protamex®
measured, and the DH of the casein hydrolyzed by Neutrase® and
Flavourzyme® are similar (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Degree of hydrolysis (DH) of casein hydrolysates.
Reaction were carried out in a water bath (50°C, 120 rpm). All
enzymes were applied at concentration 1:200 (w/v) to the casein
solution. Alcalase® 2.4 L; Neutrase®
0.8 L; Flavourzyme®; Protamex®
(NovozymesTM).
Degree of hydrolysis (DH) of casein hydrolysates.
Reaction were carried out in a water bath (50°C, 120 rpm). All
enzymes were applied at concentration 1:200 (w/v) to the casein
solution. Alcalase® 2.4 L; Neutrase®
0.8 L; Flavourzyme®; Protamex®
(NovozymesTM).Neutrase® and Protamex® selected throughout
the results of DH. Peptide fractions of casein hydrolysates isolated using
Hiprep 16/60 Sephacryl S-100 HR column in preparative liquid chromatography
system. Each fraction separated by molecular weight. 10 peptide fractions
obtained totally. Each fraction compared to the original casein hydrolysates via
SDS-PAGE for a molecular weight (Data are not shown) (Figs. 2 and 3).
Fig. 2.
Separations of casein hydrolysates using Neutrase®
in preparative LC system.
F#, fraction number in prep LC system.
Fig. 3.
Separations of casein hydrolysates using Protamex®
in preparative LC system.
F#, fraction number in prep LC system.
Separations of casein hydrolysates using Neutrase®
in preparative LC system.
F#, fraction number in prep LC system.
Separations of casein hydrolysates using Protamex®
in preparative LC system.
F#, fraction number in prep LC system.CPP contains phosphoserine and solubilizes calcium, which can promote calcium
solubilization ability. In this study, calcium solubility measured to determine
whether each fraction promote calcium solubilization ability similar with
CPP.According to experimental results, CPP showed high calcium solubility with
93.67%. Phosphoserine contained in CPP solubilizes calcium, resulting in
high calcium solubility.Both Neutrase® and Protamex® hydrolysate
fractions showed lower calcium solubility than CPP. Also, F4 and F7 in the
Neutrase® fractions showed lower than CPP but about
80% calcium solubility. The F6 have a similar level with 79.84%.
The Protamex® fractions showed lower calcium solubility than
CPP, but F3, F4, F5, F6, and F7 showed calcium solubility of about 80% or
more.This may show the potential of calcium solubilization ability. Based on the
results of the above experiments, fractions that showed good activity selected
(Figs. 4 and 5).
Fig. 4.
Calcium solubility of casein hydrolysate fractions using
Neutrase®.
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***
p<0.001; CPP vs. sample. CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NHC,
non-hydrolyzed casein; NPC, non-purified casein; F#, fraction number in
Prep LC system. All samples protein concentration were 200 μg/mL.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates.
Fig. 5.
Calcium solubility of casein hydrolysate fractions using
Protamex®.
All samples protein concentration were 200 μg/mL. All values were
mean±SD of triplicates. * p<0.05, **
p<0.01, *** p<0.001; CPP vs. sample. CPP,
casein phosphopeptide; NHC, non-hydrolyzed casein; NPC, non-purified
casein; F#, fraction number in Prep LC system.
Calcium solubility of casein hydrolysate fractions using
Neutrase®.
* p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***
p<0.001; CPP vs. sample. CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NHC,
non-hydrolyzed casein; NPC, non-purified casein; F#, fraction number in
Prep LC system. All samples protein concentration were 200 μg/mL.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates.
Calcium solubility of casein hydrolysate fractions using
Protamex®.
All samples protein concentration were 200 μg/mL. All values were
mean±SD of triplicates. * p<0.05, **
p<0.01, *** p<0.001; CPP vs. sample. CPP,
casein phosphopeptide; NHC, non-hydrolyzed casein; NPC, non-purified
casein; F#, fraction number in Prep LC system.
Cytotoxicity of casein hydrolysate fractions
Cytotoxicity test via the MTT assay is used in vitro toxicology
experiment widely. According to experimental results, despite the increase in
concentration, there were no significant differences by concentration. Except
for a NF6, there were no significance on concentration differences and cell
death. In addition, it showed cell viability of 80% or more.Therefore, it confirmed that there are no cytotoxicity of fraction samples on
macrophage cells (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Effects of hydrolysate fractions on cell viability in RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; CTR vs. NF# or PF#. CTR,
control; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NF#, Neutrase®
hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC system; PF#,
Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; 200, 150, 100, 50 μg/mL: Samples protein
concentration.
Effects of hydrolysate fractions on cell viability in RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; CTR vs. NF# or PF#. CTR,
control; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NF#, Neutrase®
hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC system; PF#,
Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; 200, 150, 100, 50 μg/mL: Samples protein
concentration.
Measurement of nitric oxide
The NO effect an important role in a blood coagulation, blood pressure regulation
and immune function against cancer cells. However, it oxidized like reactive
oxygen species (ROS) and converted into active NO. It produces oxidants that
cause cytotoxicity. The NO produced by cells exposed to inflammatory mediators
increased in tissue damage or various inflammatory diseases.According to the results of the study, as the concentration of fraction samples
increased, NO production inhibited. The MTT experiments showed that inhibition
of NO production not caused by cytotoxicity (Fig.
7).
Fig. 7.
Effects of hydrolysate fractions on NO in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cell.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***
p<0.001; CTR (–) vs. NF# or PF#. NO, nitric oxide; LPS,
lipopolysaccharide; CTR, control; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system. 200, 150, 100, 50 μg/mL: Samples protein
concentration.
Effects of hydrolysate fractions on NO in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cell.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01, ***
p<0.001; CTR (–) vs. NF# or PF#. NO, nitric oxide; LPS,
lipopolysaccharide; CTR, control; CPP, casein phosphopeptide; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system. 200, 150, 100, 50 μg/mL: Samples protein
concentration.
Measurement of cytokine
To maintain immune balance, they must be direct or indirect interactions of
immune cells. The cytokines can induce proliferation, differentiation, changes
in function and activity of various immune cells. A disease is mostly associated
with inflammation, and inflammatory cells secrete inflammatory cytokines that
induce inflammation (Barland et al.,
2004). In this study, the expression levels of IL-1α, IL-6, and
TNF-α measured.According to the results of cytokine measuring using ELISA, three cytokine
(IL-1α, IL-6, and TNF-α) production was significantly lower than
LPS(+) group (* p<0.05). Based on results, the possibility of
anti-inflammatory activity found in the hydrolysate fractions. In addition, the
low expression level of TNF-α from macrophage effect by samples prevents
the activation of proinflammatory cytokines which is produced by the expression
of TNF-α. It reduces the inflammatory response (Figs. 8–10).
Fig. 8.
Comparison of IL-1α production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; LPS(+) vs. NF# or
PF#. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NPC, non-purified casein; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system.
Fig. 10.
Comparison of TNF-α production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; LPS(+) vs. NF# or
PF#. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NPC, non-purified casein; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system.
Comparison of IL-1α production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; LPS(+) vs. NF# or
PF#. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NPC, non-purified casein; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system.
Comparison of IL-6 production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; LPS(+) vs. NF# or
PF#. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NPC, non-purified casein; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system.
Comparison of TNF-α production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7
cells.
All values were mean±SD of triplicates. *
p<0.05, ** p<0.01; LPS(+) vs. NF# or
PF#. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; NPC, non-purified casein; NF#,
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction number in Prep LC
system; PF#, Protamex® hydrolysate fraction number in
Prep LC system.
Profiling of amino acids
Based on the above experiment results, NF3 and PF3 selected. According to results
of confirming amino acid sequence of the selected fractions throughout the
AccQ-Tag system, 17 species of amino acids and several species of unknown amino
acids identified (Figs. 11 and 12; Table
3). Both fractions had the highest content of phenylalanine and the
lowest content of threonine and arginine.
Fig. 11.
HPLC chromatogram of amino acids in selected
Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction.
Fig. 12.
HPLC chromatogram of amino acids in selected
Protamex® hydrolysate fraction.
Table 3.
Amino acids concentration in selected fraction
AAs
RT
Area (%)
NF3
PF3
NF3
PF3
Asp.
11.284
14.221
2.504
2.649
Ser.
13.688
15.530
3.038
2.892833
Glu.
16.232
16.206
3.602
3.018754
Gly.
17.361
17.378
3.853
3.237067
His.
18.882
17.941
4.190
3.341939
Arg.
10.913
10.963
2.422
2.04212
Thr.
10.913
10.963
2.422
2.04212
Ala.
23.120
23.587
5.131
4.393641
Pro.
25.542
25.769
5.669
4.800091
Cys
28.573
29.207
6.341
5.4405
Tyr.
29.582
29.848
6.565
5.559902
Val.
30.270
30.445
6.718
5.671107
Met.
30.882
31.095
6.854
5.792185
Lys.
32.557
32.658
7.225
6.083331
Ile
33.566
33.664
7.449
6.270723
Leu
33.946
34.113
7.534
6.35436
Phe
34.956
35.161
7.758
6.549575
Unknown AA
48.325
128.095
10.725
23.86075
Total
450.592
536.844
100
RT, retention time; Area, amount of total amino acids (%);
NF3, Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction; PF3,
Protamex® hydrolysate fraction.
RT, retention time; Area, amount of total amino acids (%);
NF3, Neutrase® hydrolysate fraction; PF3,
Protamex® hydrolysate fraction.
Discussion
In this study, proteolytic enzymes used to focus on the function of specific peptides
derived from the hydrolysis of a casein.According to results, the DH of the four enzymes tended to increase in a similar
pattern. There was no significant difference after increasing from 120 min to 150
min. DH of Protamex® found to increase most appropriately. All
enzymatic hydrolysates maintained from 30 to 40 min and gradually increased after
50-60 min. This is similar to the previous report (Wang et al., 2013). In this study, the casein contained 95% of
protein, and the retention time of hydrolysis was about 10 min.In this study, fractions separated by molecular weight throughout the Hiprep 16/60
Sephacryl S-100 HR column. In another study, FPLC used either size exclusion or ion
exchange chromatography (Kaminarides and
Anifantakis, 1993). Chromatographic methods for peptide separation are
very diverse, but the purpose of this study was to obtain peptides similar to CPP,
so fractions separated using the column separated by molecular weight.In the case of calcium solubility experiments, no fractions with calcium
solubilization higher than CPP found. However, it has a similar level of calcium
solubilization, which has confirmed the potential to the CPP. The calcium is
solubilized by gastric acid, and most of it is absorbed in the small intestine. If
excess phosphate ions present in the small intestine before absorption, calcium
reacts to form of calcium phosphate and it is released into the body. Therefore,
there is a need to have material capable of preventing such as a precipitation
reaction, amino acids and peptides have been reported to have such properties from
before (Naito et al., 1972).Except for the NF6, there were no significance on concentration differences and cell
death. In addition, it showed with cell viability of 80% or more.According to results of the study, as the concentration of fraction samples
increased, NO production inhibited. The MTT experiments showed that inhibition of NO
and NO production was not caused by cytotoxicity. In previous study, there were
results that hydrolyzed proteins significantly inhibited NO production in NO assay
experiments comparing non-hydrolyzed protein and hydrolyzed protein (Mukhopadhya et al., 2014).In addition, studies on the inhibitory ability of inflammatory cytokines of casein
hydrolysates reported that it have high activities of Alcalase®
hydrolysates (Mao et al., 2007).According to results of confirming amino acid sequence of selected fractions
throughout the AccQ-Tag system, 17 species of amino acids and several species of
unknown amino acids identified. Both fractions had the highest content of
phenylalanine. Except for the αs1-casein, there are common
sequence feature and it is defined a N-terminal tyrosine residue. Also, it is
absolutely essential for activities. Typically, a second aromaticamino acid residue,
such as phenylalanine, is also present in the third or fourth position (Clare and Swaisgood, 2000).Therefore, these protein fractions must be obtained and produced active peptides from
them for use as dietary supplements and milk based nutraceuticals. This study
identified the potential of new biologically active peptides derived from milk
proteins that affect the food and healthcare industry.
Authors: Chantel O Barland; Elizabeth Zettersten; Barbara S Brown; Jianqin Ye; Peter M Elias; Ruby Ghadially Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 8.551
Authors: Anindya Mukhopadhya; Nessa Noronha; Bojlul Bahar; Marion T Ryan; Brian A Murray; Phil M Kelly; Ian B O'Loughlin; John V O'Doherty; Torres Sweeney Journal: Food Sci Nutr Date: 2014-09-05 Impact factor: 2.863