| Literature DB >> 34291095 |
Bingchen Guo1, Zhaoyue Li2, Peiyang Tu3, Hao Tang2, Yingfeng Tu2.
Abstract
Thrombosis in the context of atherosclerosis typically results in life-threatening consequences, including acute coronary events and ischemic stroke. As such, early detection and treatment of thrombosis in atherosclerosis patients is essential. Clinical diagnosis of thrombosis in these patients is typically based upon a combination of imaging approaches. However, conventional imaging modalities primarily focus on assessing the anatomical structure and physiological function, severely constraining their ability to detect early thrombus formation or the processes underlying such pathology. Recently, however, novel molecular and non-molecular imaging strategies have been developed to assess thrombus composition and activity at the molecular and cellular levels more accurately. These approaches have been successfully used to markedly reduce rates of atherothrombotic events in patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS) by facilitating simultaneous diagnosis and personalized treatment of thrombosis. Moreover, these modalities allow monitoring of plaque condition for preventing plaque rupture and associated adverse cardiovascular events in such patients. Sustained developments in molecular and non-molecular imaging technologies have enabled the increasingly specific and sensitive diagnosis of atherothrombosis in animal studies and clinical settings, making these technologies invaluable to patients' health in the future. In the present review, we discuss current progress regarding the non-molecular and molecular imaging of thrombosis in different animal studies and atherosclerotic patients.Entities:
Keywords: atherosclerosis; atherosclerotic plaque thrombosis; molecular imaging; non-molecular imaging; thrombosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34291095 PMCID: PMC8286992 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.692915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Molecular and Non-molecular thrombosis imaging strategies in atherosclerosis patients for assessing pathophysiological features related to early thrombosis at the molecular and cellular level (13), including ultrasound molecular imaging (6), magnetic resonance imaging (7), radionuclide imaging (14), optical imaging (15), intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, CT angiography (16), angioscopy and angiography (17).
Various imaging modalities available for the investigation of suspected CAD.
| a. Invasive coronary angiography (the traditional gold standard) | d. Direct visualization of the coronary arteries: |
Figure 2Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of thrombosis in atherosclerosis patients. The presence of residual red thrombus limits the visualization of plaque morphology (A–C). OCT images in the distal and proximal segments of the thrombotic lesions exhibit an absence of superficial lipids or calcification (B,D).
Comparative overview for different imaging modalities.
| Emission | Sound waves | Radio waves | Gamma rays | Near-infrared light | Sound waves (Intravascular) | infrared light | X-rays |
| Wavelength (μm) | 35–80 | NA | <0.01 | 0.8–2.5 | 35–80 | 1.3 | <0.01 |
| Penetration (mm) | 10.0 | 0.25 | >10.0 | 1.0–2.0 | 10.0 | 1.0–2.5 | 0.0 |
| Resolution (μm) | NA | 100 | 400–600 | NA | 100–200 | Axial: 10–20lateral: 30 | >500 |
| Thrombus imaging | + | ++ | ++ | + | + | +++ | ++ |
| Advantages | Low cost, high sensitivity, early quantitative evaluation, no trauma, no radioactivity, and high safety, real-time imaging | Non-invasive, non-ionizing radiation, high spatial resolution, deep tissue penetration and excellent soft-tissue contrast, functional-anatomical imaging | High sensitivity, large number of molecular probes, quantitative evaluation, multiple isotopes, physiological imaging | Low cost, high sensitivity, no radioactivity, multiple molecular probes, portable and real-time imaging | The real-time assessment of vessel wall and plaque components (lipid core, thrombus), cross-sectional and vertical axis imaging | The evidence of OCT used for evaluation of coronary artery thrombosis is considered very high, high-resolution cross-sectional imaging | high specificity, real-time assessment of lesion, vascular stenosis, widely used in clinical and research applications |
| Disadvantages | Limited field of view | Limited contrast agents | Low spatial resolution, radiation, expensive | Low tissue penetration | Limited imaging resolution | Low tissue penetration, the attenuation effect | Radiation, invasive, lack sensitivity |
Imaging modalities for assessing thrombosis in atherosclerosis have their strengths and drawbacks with respect to spatial and temporal resolution, depth of subject penetration, and detection threshold. Therefore, appropriate imaging technology selection requires sufficient consideration of each method's advantages and disadvantages. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography; SPECT, Single-photon emission computed tomography; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Figure 3The characteristics of different molecular imaging approachs. Ultrasound molecular imaging of thrombosis (A). Color-coded ultrasound molecular signal overlays indicate that targeted MBs yield a specific signal only in the presence of thrombin. Reproduced with permission from Yan et al. (83). Copyright Theranostics. 2018. Magnetic resonance imaging of thrombosis (B). The high MR signal area of thrombi is significantly increased after contrast agent injection in the presence of atherosclerotic plaques Reproduced with permission from Zhang et al. (92). Copyright Int J Nanomedicine (2019). Radionuclide imaging of thrombosis (C). Fibrin-binding peptides coupled to radioactive tracers specifically interacting with arterial thrombi as detected in PET/SPECT images. Reproduced with permission from Lee et al. (120). Copyright Korean J Radiol (2015). Optical imaging of thrombosis (D). Fluorescence imaging of nanoparticles binding to fibrin clots formed from fibrinogen and thrombin. Reproduced with permission from Wen et al. (121). Copyright J Mater Chem B (2015).