| Literature DB >> 34290921 |
Spyros Atzamoglou1, Maria Siopi2, Joseph Meletiadis2, Ioannis Markopoulos1, Loukas Kontomichos1, George Batsos1, Efstratios Paroikakis1, Vasileios Peponis1.
Abstract
Fungal keratitis is an infection that is insidious and frequently misdiagnosed. Those with chronic eye surface conditions, contact lenses, systemic immunosuppression, and diabetes have been the most frequently affected with fungal keratitis. An 84-year-old male patient with a history of bilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus presented with pain and decreased visual acuity on his left eye. A corneal perforation was found, which was treated immediately with a full-thickness corneal transplant. The specimen was sent for bacterial and fungal cultures. Topical corticosteroids were prescribed postoperatively. Beauveria bassiana was isolated from the corneal scrapings. The postoperative treatment was modified by reducing the dose of corticosteroid and adding topical natamycin together with systemic posaconazole. No recurrence occurred in the transplant four months postoperatively under topical dexamethasone 0.1% b.i.d. This is the first case of keratitis and perforation in a previously transplanted cornea. Due to the rarity of the infection, there are no clear guidelines for postoperative prophylaxis in B. bassiana infection. Either the continuation of corticosteroids or the switch to another immunosuppressive therapy and selecting the appropriate antifungal regimen posed a significant therapeutic dilemma.Entities:
Keywords: beauveria bassiana; filamentous; fungal; keratitis; penetrating keratoplasty
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290921 PMCID: PMC8289404 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Macroscopic (A) and microscopic (B) morphologies of Beauveria bassiana isolated from the scraped cornea after eight days of incubation at 30°C. (Lactophenol cotton blue staining of slide culture, original magnification 400x.)
Figure 2Four months post-operatively, the graft is clear with no signs of peripheral infiltration and a mild central subepithelial haze (left). In comparison, seven days post-operatively mild epithelial defect is detected (right).