| Literature DB >> 34290865 |
Gabriel Parra-Henao1, Sandra P Garzón-Jiménez2, Yuly Bernal-Rosas3, Mario J Olivera4, Marlon Salgado5, Orlando A Torres-García2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying risk factors for Triatominae infestation is essential for the development of vector control interventions.Entities:
Keywords: Chagas disease; Colombia; epidemiological risk; reduviidae; triatominae
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290865 PMCID: PMC8274114 DOI: 10.1177/20499361211030068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Infect Dis ISSN: 2049-9361
Figure 1.Geographic distribution of sampling sites.
Figure 2.Photograph of the peri-domicile of houses in urban area of the municipality of La Mesa. The presence of vegetation and other risk factors is observed in the peri-domicile of a house in an urban area a few blocks from the center of the municipality.
Figure 3.Inspection of grooves, holes, and cracks in walls.
Figure 4.Preparation and placement of traps with animal bait.
Figure 5.Palm inspection.
Figure 6.Packaging of triatomines captured by trapping.
Summary of entomological indexes for triatomines in La Mesa.
| Entomological indices | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infestation % | Dispersion % | Infection % | Colonization % | Density % | Concentration % | |
| Rural region | 17 (11/64) | 44 (4/9) | 66.6 (10/15) | 0 | 23 (15/64) | 136 (15/11) |
| Urban region | 6.9 (10/143) | 71 (5/7) | 64.7 (11/17) | 4.7 (1/21) | 11.8 (17/143) | 170 (17/10) |
| Total municipality | 10 (21/207) | 56 (9/16) | 65 (21/32) | 4.7 (1/21) | 15 (32/207) | 152 (32/21) |
Entomological indexes for triatomines in La Mesa.
| Entomological indices | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rural region |
| Infestation % | Dispersion % | Infection % | Colonization % | Density % | Concentration % |
| La Vega | 5 | 60 (3/5) | NA | 80 (4/5) | 0 | 100 (5/5) | 166 (5/3) |
| El Espino | 5 | 20 (1/5) | NA | 0 | 0 | 20 (1/5) | 100 (1/1) |
| Baltimore | 2 | 50 (1/2) | NA | 0 | 0 | 50 (1/2) | 100 (1/1) |
| Hungría | 5 | 60 (3/5) | NA | 66.6 (2/3) | 0 | 60 (3/5) | 100 (3/3) |
| Zapata | 16 | 6 (1/16) | NA | 100 (2/2) | 0 | 12 (2/16) | 200 (2/1) |
| Hospicio | 3 | 66.6 (2/3) | NA | 66.6 (2/3) | 0 | 100 (3/3) | 150 (3/2) |
| El Palmar | 20 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cápata | 5 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| San Martín | 3 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total rural | 64 | 17 (11/64) | 44 (4/9) | 66.6 (10/15) | 0 | 23 (15/64) | 136 (15/11) |
| Urban region |
| Infestation % | Dispersion % | Infection % | Colonization % | Density % | Concentration % |
| Marsella | 8 | 12 (1/8) | NA | 60 (3/5) | 12 (1/8) | 62 (5/8) | 62 (5/8) |
| Toledo | 40 | 5 (2/40) | NA | 0 | 0 | 5 (2/40) | 5 (2/40) |
| Villas del Nuevo Siglo | 29 | 6.8 (2/29) | NA | 100 (3/3) | 0 | 10 (3/29) | 10 (3/29) |
| Santa Bárbara | 17 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| La Perla | 24 | 8 (2/24) | NA | 50 (1/2) | 0 | 8 (2/24) | 12 (3/24) |
| La Perlita | 10 | 10 (1/10) | NA | 100 (3/3) | 0 | 30 (3/10) | 30 (3/10) |
| Las Ceibas | 15 | 13 (2/15) | NA | 50 (1/2) | 0 | 13 (2/15) | 13 (2/15) |
| Total urban | 143 | 6.9 (10/143) | 71 (5/7) | 64.7 (11/17) | 4.7 (1/21) | 11.8 (17/143) | 170 (17/10) |
| Total in the municipality | 207 | 10 (21/207) | 56 (9/16) | 65 (21/32) | 4.7 (1/21) | 15 (32/207) | 152 (32/21) |
Selected results of bivariable analyses of associations between infestation and exposure variables.
| Variable |
| Triatomines (%) | OR (95% CI) | X2 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||||
| Location | 207 | Rural | 11 (17.2) | 53 (82.8) | 2.8 (1.1–6.8) | 0.025 |
| Urban
| 10 (7.0) | 133 (93.0) | 1 | |||
| Knowledge | 206 | Yes | 17 (20.9) | 64 (79.0) | 0.09 (0.026–0.32) | 0.000 |
| No
| 3 (2.4) | 122 (97.6) | 1 | |||
| See triatomines inside the house | 132 | Yes | 12 (30.7) | 27 (69.23) | 6.44 (2.2–18.8) | 0.000 |
| No
| 6 (64.5) | 87 (9.3) | 1 | |||
| Walls with cracks and crevices | 207 | Yes | 8 (18.6) | 35 (81.3) | 2.65 (1.02–6.8) | 0.039 |
| No
| 13 (7.92) | 151 (92.07) | 1 | |||
| Floors with cracks and crevices | 207 | Yes | 5 (2.94) | 12 (70.58) | 4.5 (1.41–14.48) | 0.006 |
| No
| 16 (0.84) | 174 (91.57) | 1 | |||
| Domestic animals | 207 | Yes | 17 (13.6) | 108 (86.4) | 3.06 (1.7–9.47) | 0.004 |
| No
| 4 (3.2) | 78 (62.4) | 1 | |||
| Accumulated objects | 207 | Yes | 13 (19.11) | 55 (80.88) | 3.8 (1.5–9.8) | 0.003 |
| No
| 8 (5.75) | 131 (94.24) | 1 | |||
Reference category.
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
OR (95% CI) of risk factors associated with the infestation in multivariable analysis.
| Variable | OR crude
| OR adjusted
| OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | ||||
| Location_Urban
| 1742 | 0.035 | 5708 | 1542 | 39,238 |
| Knowledge about Chagas disease
| −4083 | 0.001 | 0.017 | 0.001 | 0.524 |
| Floor has cracks or cervices | 1897 | 0.0033 | 6668 | 2.6 | 81,994 |
| Enramadas outside the house
| 1802 | 0.0078 | 6059 | 2.3 | 44,781 |
| Accumulated objects inside or outside the house
| 1818 | 0.0021 | 6162 | 3.58 | 67,567 |
Reference category; *β value; **β exponential.
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.