| Literature DB >> 34290706 |
Jean-François Llitjos1,2,3, Yacine Bounab4, Christophe Rousseau1,2, Sophie Dixneuf4, Blandine Rimbault4, Jean-Daniel Chiche1,2,3, Julien Textoris5,6,7, Frédéric Pène1,2,3, Christophe Védrine4.
Abstract
Objective: The development of advanced single-cell technologies to decipher inter-cellular heterogeneity has enabled the dynamic assessment of individual cells behavior over time, overcoming the limitation of traditional assays. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of an advanced microfluidic assay combined to fluorescence microscopy to address the behavior of circulating monocytes from septic shock patients.Entities:
Keywords: immune suppression; microfluidic; monocyte; septic shock; tolerance
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290706 PMCID: PMC8288100 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.686111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Main characteristics of patients with septic shock.
| Patients’ Identification | Gender | Age, years | Source of infection | Admission SOFA | Admission SAPS2 | First lactate, mmol/L | WBC count, G/L | Monocytes count, G/L |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Male | 43 | Lung | 7 | 77 | 9.3 | 3.5 | 0 |
|
| Male | 70 | Lung | 21 | 87 | 8.6 | 1.8 | 0.05 |
|
| Male | 59 | Lung | 9 | 54 | 3.6 | 34.2 | 1.12 |
|
| Male | 86 | Urinary tract | 2 | 45 | 2.6 | 40.2 | 0.96 |
|
| Male | 31 | Lung | 8 | 76 | 2 | 16.9 | 0.86 |
|
| Female | 73 | Meningeal | 2 | 39 | 4.4 | 11.9 | 0.5 |
|
| Male | 80 | Lung | 4 | 37 | 2.3 | 14.3 | 0.8 |
Age is expressed in years, SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; SAPSII, simplified acute physiology score II; WBC, white blood cells.
Figure 1Flow cytometry assessment of monocyte deactivation. Monocytes were stimulated in vitro with 1 μg/mL LPS for 180 minutes. (A) Proportions of TNFα-positive monocytes without or with LPS stimulation in healthy donors (n = 10) and septic shock patients (n=7). (B, C) TNFα intracellular staining (with or without LPS stimulation) and HLA-DR membrane expression. (D) Representative dot-plots of intracellular production of TNFα. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. *p < 0.001.
Figure 2Single-cell dynamic microfluidic analysis of monocyte TNFα secretion under LPS stimulation. (A, B) Heatmaps expressing TNFα secretion rate over time in one healthy donor (988 cells) (A) and one septic shock patient (1021 cells) (B). Cells were clustered based on TNFα secretion rate at 60 min. Secretion rate is expressed in TNFα molecules per second. (C) Means of maximal amount of TNFα molecules in cells. (D) Mean time to reach the maximal concentration of TNFα in each cell. (E) Proportion of monocytes secreting TNFα (molecules/sec) over time after LPS stimulation. (F, G) Proportions of secreting monocytes clustered by TNFα secretion rates over time in healthy donors (F) and septic shock patients (G). *p < 0.05.
Figure 3Single cell dynamic microfluidic monitoring of monocyte phagocytosis. (A) Kinetics of phagocytosis activity of one monocyte starting at 90 min. Brightfield images (upper panel) illustrate cell migration toward the beadline (from center to the left of the droplet). Fluorescence images (lower panel) show the impact of phagocytosis on the beadline fluorescence signal (fuzzy fluorescence signal at 180 min due to the loss of beadline integrity). (B) Cumulative proportions of monocytes with phagocytosis of magnetic beadline over 180 min after LPS stimulation.