| Literature DB >> 34290694 |
Caroline Spenlé1,2,3, Thomas Loustau2,3,4, Hélène Burckel5, Gilles Riegel2,3,4, Chérine Abou Faycal2,3,4, Chengbei Li2,3,4, Alev Yilmaz1,2,3,4, Luciana Petti6, Fanny Steinbach2,3,4, Constance Ahowesso1,2,3, Camille Jost1,2,3, Nicodème Paul2,3,7, Raphael Carapito2,3,7, Georges Noël5,8, Fabienne Anjuère6, Nathalie Salomé2,3,4, Gertraud Orend1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Radiotherapy, the most frequent treatment of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) besides surgery is employed to kill tumor cells but, radiotherapy may also promote tumor relapse where the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) could be instrumental. We established a novel syngeneic grafting model from a carcinogen-induced tongue tumor, OSCC13, to address the impact of radiotherapy on OSCC. This model revealed similarities with human OSCC, recapitulating carcinogen-induced mutations found in smoking associated human tongue tumors, abundant tumor infiltrating leukocytes (TIL) and, spontaneous tumor cell dissemination to the local lymph nodes. Cultured OSCC13 cells and OSCC13-derived tongue tumors were sensitive to irradiation. At the chosen dose of 2 Gy mimicking treatment of human OSCC patients not all tumor cells were killed allowing to investigate effects on the TME. By investigating expression of the extracellular matrix molecule tenascin-C (TNC), an indicator of an immune suppressive TME, we observed high local TNC expression and TIL infiltration in the irradiated tumors. In a TNC knockout host the TME appeared less immune suppressive with a tendency towards more tumor regression than in WT conditions. Altogether, our novel syngeneic tongue OSCC grafting model, sharing important features with the human OSCC disease could be relevant for future anti-cancer targeting of OSCC by radiotherapy and other therapeutic approaches.Entities:
Keywords: immune suppression; oral squamous carcinoma; radiotherapy; syngeneic animal model; tenascin-C; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290694 PMCID: PMC8287883 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Phenotype of a new OSCC model. (A) Phase contrast and IF imaging of E-cadherin in OSCC2 and OSCC13 cells. Scale bar, 25 µm. (B) Percentage of somatic substitutions located in the translated or untranslated genome regions in patients with smoking-associated HNSCC (top (32), in 4NQO-derived lesions (middle (24); and in OSCC13 cells (bottom). (C) Graphical matrix representation of individual mutations in OSCC13 compared to 4MOSCs and smoking-associated HNSCC (24, 32). The most frequently observed alterations in the indicated genes of human HPV negative HNSCC (TGCA database) and the corresponding percentage of mutations in 4MOSCs and OSCC13 are shown. The presence (red) or absence (blue) of mutations are indicated for OSCC13 and the 4MOSC1–4 cells when at least two of the four cells showed the same phenotype. (D, E) RNA data analysis of cultured OSCC13 cells 24 h after plating. (D) Lollipop mutational plot of TP53 mutations in human HNSCC (HPV-negative) tumor samples from TCGA database (top) and mouse HNSCC cell line (OSCC13) (bottom). The frequency of mutations is represented by the height of the lollipop. The blue circles indicate mutations specific to human or mouse, and the red circles illustrate mutations common to human and mouse HNSCCs. TAM, Transactivation motif; TEM, Tetramerisation motif. (E) Over-represented gene ontology terms as determined by the Webgestalt program and Geneontology database. Bar charts show the enrichment ratio (blue) and expressed gene numbers (red) of the 10 most over-represented GO processes associated with FDR ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2Characterization of OSCC13 tumors by immunostaining. 4 weeks syngeneic tongue tumors derived from 1 × 106 engrafted OSCC13 cells were stained for the indicated molecules. Representative images are shown (N = 3). Scale bar, 100 µm. Arrows point at LYVE+ lymphatic and CD31+ blood vessels in the surroundings of the tumor mass (A), at P-Smad3+ cells (higher magnification inlet in B), and at ERTR7+ cells invading the tumor mass from the surrounding tissue (D). (C–E), scale bar, 500 μm (left). Right panels, higher magnification, scale bar, 100 μm (C, E), 50 μm (D).
Figure 3Characterization of immunity markers in OSCC13 tumors by immunostaining. About 4 weeks syngeneic tongue tumors derived from 1 × 106 engrafted OSCC13 cells were stained for the indicated molecules. Representative images are shown (N = 3). Scale bar, 100 µm. Arrows point at CD45+ (B), CD11c+ (C), CCR7+ (D), F4/80 and CD206+ (E) and Foxp3+ cells (F) that are in close vicinity to matrix. (A, D), scale bar, 500 μm (left). Right panels, higher magnification. Scale bar, 50 μm (A), 100 μm (D).
Figure 4OSCC13 tumor cells home to the local lymph nodes and expand. (A) Detection of luciferase expressing OSCC13 cells in the lymph node by a Nightowl imaging machine in a nude mouse and in the dissected lymph nodes. Luciferin signal in the tumor and, expanding in the lymph node from 1–3 weeks. N = 3 mice. (B–D), OSCC13 cells were engrafted in a C57Bl/6J mouse. (B) Representative result (N = 3) of disseminated OSCC13 cells in the lymph node by p63 (C) and P-Smad3 (D) staining and proliferating CK8/18+ tumor cells by Ki67 staining (E). Note tumor cells (p63+) to be placed in TNC+ matrix (inlet of C) and proliferation of tumor cells (CK8/18+) (E), confirming tumor cell expansion in the lymph nodes presumably forming metastasis in the immune competent context like in nude mice (A). N = 3 mice. Scale bar, 500 µm (B) and 50 µm (C–E). Arrows point at tumor cells.
Figure 5Impact of irradiation on cultured OSCC13 cells and tumors. (A) OSCC13 cell proliferation upon exposure to the indicated irradiation doses after the indicated time points (hours, h) using a resazurin assay. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. Student–Newman–Keuls test. *p < 0.05. (B) Clonogenic survival assessment upon exposure to the indicated irradiation doses. The surviving fractions are represented. Mean ± SD of four independent experiments. ANOVA test. **p <0.001, *p < 0.005. (C) Representative (N = 5) macroscopical images of H&E stained tongue tissue from OSCC13 tumors in a WT host and upon immunostaining with specific antibodies against laminin (LM, red) or TNC (red) together with CD45 (green)or p63 (green). Scale bar, 100 µm. Arrow points at dense TNC matrix seen upon irradiation. IR, irradiated; NIR, non-irradiated.
Figure 6Impact of TNC on T cell stimulation and on OSCC13 tumor abundance upon irradiation. (A) TNC immunostaining of non-irradiated (NIR) and irradiated (IR) tumors from WT and TNCKO mice 2 weeks upon irradiation with 2 Gy. Scale bar 100 µm. WT, N = 6, TNCKO, N = 9. (B) Gene expression analysis (qRTPCR) of different TNC FNIII domains (exon junctions) in OSCC13 cells 24 h upon 2 Gy irradiation (normalized to GAPDH). N = three experiments. The domain organization of TNC is schematically depicted on top with heptad oligomerization domain (triangle), FNIII domains (dark, constant, light, alternatively spliced) and fibrinogen globe (circle). (C) Expression of cytokines in T cells present in OSCC13 tumors from WT and TNCKO mice (2 weeks upon engraftment), 24 h after stimulation with CD3/CD28 beads, with a cytokine cytometry bead array (CBA) assay. Mean ± SEM, Mann–Whitney test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.05. (D) Representative H&E and immunostaining images for CK8/18 and CD45 (N = 5) of a non-irradiated and irradiated tongue from a OSCC13 tumor bearing mouse (WT or TNCKO). (E) Detection of tumors (by CK8/18 signal) in irradiated WT (N = 6/7) and TNCKO mice (N = 6/9); ns, not significant. Note that whereas all engrafted mice developed tumors in both genotypes, upon irradiation there was a partial regress.
Figure 7Irradiation effects on CD206+ macrophages in OSCC13 tumors. Representative (N = 5) macroscopical images of H&E stained tongue tissue and immunostaining with specific antibodies against laminin (LM, green) and CD206 (red) in OSCC13 tumors from WT (A) and TNCKO mice (B). Scale bar, 100 µm. (C) Quantification of CD206+ cells in the tongue (referenced to DAPI signal) in percentage. N = 3, mean ± SEM, non-parametric ANOVA followed by Dunns post-test, *p < 0.05. (D) Relative distribution of CD206+ cells inside or outside the tumor of WT and TNCKO mice in non-irradiated (NIR) and irradiated (IR) conditions, respectively. N = 3, mean ± SEM, non-parametric ANOVA followed by Dunns post-test, *p <0.05. NIR, non-irradiated mice; IR, irradiated mice.