| Literature DB >> 34290665 |
Francesco Agostini1, Letizia Pezzi2, Marco Paoloni1, Roberta Insabella1, Carmine Attanasi3, Andrea Bernetti1, Raoul Saggini2, Massimiliano Mangone1, Teresa Paolucci2.
Abstract
Fatigue is a multidimensional symptom with both physical and cognitive aspects, which can affect the quality of daily and working life activities. Motor Imagery (MI) represents an important resource for use during the rehabilitation processes, useful, among others, for job integration/reintegration, of neurological pathologies, such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS). To define the effective rehabilitation protocols that integrate MI for the reduction of fatigue in patients with MS (PwMS), a literary review was performed through August 2020. Five articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, including two feasibility pilot randomized control trials (RCTs) and 3 RCTs with good quality according to the PEDro score and a low risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The literature suggested that MI, in association with rhythmic-auditory cues, may be an effective rehabilitation resource for reducing fatigue. Positive effects were observed on perceived cognitive and psychological fatigue. PwMS require greater compensatory strategies than healthy individuals, and the use of rhythmic-auditory cues may be useful for optimizing the cognitive processing of MI, which acts as an internal stimulus that is enhanced and made more vivid by outside cues. These findings provide evidence that MI is a promising rehabilitation tool for reducing fatigue in PwMS and return to work strategies.Entities:
Keywords: balance; cues; exercise; neurocognitive; rehabilitation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290665 PMCID: PMC8287528 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.696276
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Studies selection criteria and PICO question.
| Population | PwMS | Other neurological condition |
| Intervention | Motor Imagery training | Usual treatment |
| Comparison/control | Usual treatment, PwMS in waiting list, Healthy subjects | |
| Outcome | Reduction of fatigue / Return-to-work | |
| Study design | Randomized controlled trial | Other designs, e.g., commentary, opinions, thesis, book chapter, data based on meetings and repositories of dissertations and theses and gray literature. |
| Other | English language, full text | Other language |
PwMS, people with multiple sclerosis.
Figure 1PRISMA flow-diagram showing the selection of the included studies.
Summary of the intervention and outcomes (or results) of the included study.
| Seebacher et al. ( | RCT (Pilot study), 6 | TG1 = 10F; | TG1 = 3 (1, 5;4, 5) | TG1 = music and verbally cued MI + weekly phone call | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | Walking speed and distance ( | T0 (at baseline) | Fatigue reduced in TG1 by median −9.5 (range −31, 5) points, in TG2 by −13 (range −28, 7) points and in CG by −3 (range −17, 4) points. |
| Seebacher et al. ( | RCT,7 | TG1 = 25F; | TG1 = 2,0 | TG1 = music and verbally cued MI + weekly phone call | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | Walking speed and distance and perception ( | T0 (at baseline) T1 (after 4 week)/n°24 | Cognitive and total fatigue reduced significantly in TG1 and TG2. Physical fatigue significantly reduced only in TG1, but psychosocial fatigue did not reduce. There were no clinically meaningful reductions in fatigue. |
| Seebacher et al. ( | RCT (Pilot study), 7 | TG1 = 4F; | TG1 = 4,5 | TG1 = music and verbally cued MI + weekly phone call + usual treatment | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | Walking speed and distance ( | T0 (at baseline) T1 (after 4 week)/n°24 | A mild reduction in fatigue was observed in all groups. |
| Seebacher et al. ( | RCT, 7 | TG1 = 15F; | TG1 = 3,0 | TG1 = music and verbally cued MI + weekly phone call + usual treatment | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | Walking speed and distance ( | T0 (at baseline) T1 (after 4 week)/n°20 | Physical and cognitive fatigue and physical QoL significantly reduced only in TG1and TG2 and psychosocial fatigue significantly reduced in all groups (all |
| Kahraman et al. ( | RCT, 7 | TG = 16F; | TG = 1,0 | TG = Telerehabilitation-based MI training | Modified Fatigue Impact Scale | Gait and balance ( | T0 (at baseline) T1 (after 8 week)/n°16 | There was a significant reduction from baseline at 8 weeks in the TG, ( |
RCT, randomized controlled trial; TG, treatment group; CG, control group; HCG, healthy controls group; T25FW, timed 25-foot walk; 6-MWT, 6-min walking test; MSWS-12, multiple sclerosis walking scale-12; MSIS-29, multiple sclerosis impact scale-29; HRQoL, health- related quality of life; SF-36, short form-36 health survey; EQ-5D-3L, euroquol-5D-3L questionnaire; KVIQ-10, kinaesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire; KVIQ-G-10, kinaesthetic and visual imagery questionnaire – german version; TDMI, time-dependent motor imagery screening test; DGI, dynamic gait index; T25FW, timed 25-foot walk; 2-MWT, 2-min walk test; TUG, timed up and go test; ABC test, activities-specific balance confidence test; SDMT, symbol digit modalities test; SRT, selective reminding test; 10/36SRT, 10/36 spatial recall test; HADS, hospital anxiety and depression scale; MusiQoL, multiple sclerosis international quality of life questionnaire.
Risk of bias summary.
| Seebacher et al. ( | Low | + | + | – | – | + | + | ? |
| Seebacher et al. ( | Low | + | + | – | – | + | + | ? |
| Seebacher et al. ( | Low | + | + | – | – | + | + | ? |
| Seebacher et al. ( | Low | + | + | – | – | + | + | ? |
| Kahraman et al. ( | Low | + | + | – | + | + | + | ? |
| Random sequence generation | Allocation concealment | Blinding of participants and personnel | Blinding of outcome assessment | Incomplete outcome data | Selective reporting | Other bias |
The ‘+' means low risk of bias; the ‘-' means high risk of bias; the ‘?' means unknown risk of bias. Trials involving three or more high risks of bias were considered as poor methodological quality.