| Literature DB >> 34290261 |
Samar R Saleh1,2,3, Asmaa M Masry4, Doaa A Ghareeb4,5,6, Al-Sayeda A Newairy4, Eman Sheta7, Adham M Maher4.
Abstract
Date pits are nutritious by-products, containing high levels of indigestible carbohydrates and polyphenols. To maximize the biological effects of the active ingredients, the hard shell of the polysaccharide must be degraded. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess the protective potentials of date pits extract (DP) and fungal degraded date pits extract (FDDP) against scopolamine (SCO)-induced neurodegeneration in male rats. Date pits were subjected to fungal degradation and extraction, followed by the measurement of phytochemicals and free radical scavenging activities. Forty-two adult Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into seven groups: three control groups administered with either saline, DP or FDDP; four groups with neurodegeneration receiving SCO (ip 2 mg/kg/day, SCO group) with no treatment, SCO with DP (oral 100 mg/kg/day, DP + SCO group), SCO with FDDP (oral, 100 mg/kg/day, FDDP + SCO group), and SCO with donepezil (DON, oral, 2.25 mg/kg/day, DON + SCO group). The treatment duration was 28 days, and in the last 14 days, SCO was administered daily. Morris water maze test, acetylcholine esterase activity, oxidative stress, markers of inflammation and amyloidogenesis, and brain histopathology were assessed.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34290261 PMCID: PMC8295356 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94058-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The total contents of phenolics and flavonoids and the antioxidant effects of date pits (DP) and fungus degraded date pits (FDDP) extracts using DPPH and hydroxyl radical scavenging assays.
| Phytochemicals | Concentration | |
|---|---|---|
| DP | FDDP | |
| Yield (g%) | 8 ± 0.58 | 12 ± 0.59* |
| Total phenolics (µg catechin Eq/ mg extract) | 301.97 ± 5.16 | 367.11 + 2.80* |
| Total flavonoids (µg gallic acid Eq/ mg extract) | 5.10 ± 2.75 | 12.90 + 1.01* |
| HPLC analysis of Phenolic compounds (μg/ g extract) | ||
| Pyrogallol | ND | |
| Quinol | ND | |
| Gallic acid | ND | ND |
| 3-Hydroxytyrosol | ND | |
| Catechol | ND | |
| p- Hydroxy benzoic acid | 753.99 ± 7.1 | |
| Catechin | 70.76 ± 2.0* | 57.55 ± 2.8 |
| Chlorogenic | 26.67 ± 1.5* | 13.32 ± 1.8 |
| Vanillic acid | ||
| Caffeic acid | 89.58 ± 7.0* | 59.61 ± 4.4 |
| Syringic acid | 119.03 ± 3.9* | 79.55 ± 2.1 |
| p- Coumaric acid | 19.24 ± 1.9* | 7.96 ± 1.1 |
| Benzoic acid | ||
| Ferulic acid | 21.16 ± 3.2 | 12.84 ± 2.4* |
| Rutin | 17.55 ± 2.9 | |
| Ellagic acid | 24.89 ± 5.0 | |
| o- Coumaric acid | 10.72 ± 1.1 | |
| Resveratrol | 240.20 ± 14.3 | |
| Cinnamic acid | ND | 2.27 ± 0.3* |
| Quercetin | ND | ND |
| Rosmarinic acid | ND | ND |
| Naringenin | ND | ND |
| Myricetin | ND | |
| Kaempferol | ND | ND |
| Total | 4180.86 ± 18.5 | |
| Scavenging activity (IC50) | ||
| DPPH | 114.43 | |
| OH radical | 43.5 | 4.22 |
Results are presented as Mean ± SD (n = 3). Eq Equivalent, ND Not detected. * significant increase at p < 0.05.
Bold indicated the difference between DP and FDDP.
Figure 1The concentrations of the phenolic compounds in ethanolic DP and FDDP extracts from HPLC anahysis.
Figure 2Effect of different treatments on the escape latency time (A) and number of crossings a hidden platform for 60 s (B) during the Morris water maze. Data were expressed as mean ± SD of six rats. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (P ≤ 0.05 vs. control group and P ≤ 0.05 vs. SCO group).
Changes in the levels of pro- and anti- oxidants parameters, total cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipids, Aβ42 and the activity of AChE in serum and/or brain extract of male rats administering different treatments.
| Parameters | Experimental groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | DP | FDDP | SCO | DP + SCO | FDDP + SCO | DON + SCO | |
| SerumA | 1.30 ± 0.03 | 1.14 ± 0.06a | 1.17 ± 0.68a | 1.22 ± 0.02b | 1.22 ± 0.09b | 1.65 ± 0.11b | |
| BrainB | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01a | 0.23 ± 0.01a | 0.23 ± 0.01b | 0.24 ± 0.01b | 0.26 ± 0.01b | |
| SerumA | 56.00 ± 2.48 | 48.70 ± 2.39a | 50.70 ± 1.30a | 53.30 ± 1.25b | 67.30 ± 1.11b | 56.40 ± 1.29b | |
| BrainB | 52.40 ± 1.42 | 38.90 ± 1.98a | 33.90 ± 1.35a | 58.50 ± 1.79b | 47.50 ± 3.66b | 76.00 ± 1.84b | |
| Serum | 30.00 ± 1.00 | 50.00 ± 0.40a | 55.00 ± 0.40a | 48.00 ± 1.00b | 76.00 ± 0.50 | 11.00 ± 0.40b | |
| Brain | 55.20 ± 0.88 | 52.90 ± 0.37a | 50.30 ± 0.62a | 50.40 ± 0.21b | 51.00 ± 0.28b | 50.00 ± 0.93b | |
| Serum | 3.61 ± 0.18 | 4.50 ± 0.29a | 5.75 ± 0.48a | 3.39 ± 0.04b | 4.36 ± 0.33b | 3.47 ± 0.20b | |
| Brain | 3.96 ± 0.37 | 3.58 ± 0.27a | 5.14 ± 0.40a | 3.29 ± 0.21b | 5.90 ± 0.46b | 1.70 ± 0.21b | |
| Serum | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.02a | 0.98 ± 0.12a | 0.37 ± 0.08b | 0.80 ± 0.11b | 0.78 ± 0.04b | |
| Brain | 3.55 ± 0.19 | 5.40 ± 0.14a | 6.40 ± 0.22a | 5.79 ± 0.28b | 7.65 ± 0.37b | 5.14 ± 0.09b | |
| Serum | 20.20 ± 1.30 | 25.30 ± 0.80a | 19.90 ± 2.27 | 13.30 ± 0.75b | 16.60 ± 0.32b | 3.10 ± 0.14b | |
| Brain | 84.10 ± 1.40 | 114.00 ± 1.10a | 138.00 ± 3.60a | 154.00 ± 1.31b | 165.00 ± 1.85b | 110.00 ± 2.50b | |
| SerumE | 87.10 ± 2.72 | 71.00 ± 3.82a | 67.80 ± 2.84a | 93.30 ± 1.60b | 68.40 ± 4.26b | 84.10 ± 4.54b | |
| BrainF | 77.87 ± 1.20 | 54.20 ± 3.84a | 49.30 ± 3.35a | 82.00 ± 0.74b | 34.80 ± 3.47b | 47.10 ± 3.31b | |
| SerumE | 117.00 ± 2.36 | 101.00 ± 6.57a | 94.00 ± 4.73a | 148.00 ± 1.08b | 123.00 ± 6.20b | 95.00 ± 2.88b | |
| BrainF | 320.00 ± 10.00 | 285.00 ± 11.90a | 293.00 ± 22.10a | 354.00 ± 10.10b | 288.70 ± 7.85b | 446.00 ± 8.00b | |
| BrainF | 69.90 ± 6.00 | 101.40 ± 4.80a | 97.80 ± 1.90a | 83.40 ± 9.11b | 100.00 ± 3.16b | 42.20 ± 5.30b | |
| BrainD | 4.80 ± 0.15 | 3.38 ± 0.25a | 2.54 ± 0.24a | 2.63 ± 0.31b | 1.93 ± 0.16b | 2.55 ± 0.56b | |
| Aβ42 | |||||||
| BrainG | 73.00 ± 4.24 | 49.00 ± 2.58a | 43.75 ± 2.82a | 68.17 ± 3.19b | 32.33 ± 2.80b | 96.50 ± 4.19b | |
Values represent the mean ± SD of six rats. ANOVA (one-way) followed by Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used (ap ≤ 0.05 vs. Control group and bp ≤ 0.05 vs. SCO group).
Aµmol/ml; Bµmol/g tissue; Cμmol/mg protein; DU/mg protein, Emg/dl; Fmg/g tissue and Gpg/ mg protein.
Bold represented SCO Group.
Primer sequences, corresponding PCR conditions and product size of the target genes.
| Gene name/ Base pair | Primer Sequence | Annealing conditions | Number of cycles | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denature (oC) | Anneal (oC) | Extend (oC) | ||||
| AChE/123 bp[ | F | 5′-TTCTCCCACACCTGTCCTCATC-3′ | 94 | 52.6 | 72 | 40 |
| R | 5′-TTCATAGATACCAACACGGTTCCC-3′ | |||||
| ADAM-17/400 bp[ | F | 5′-TAGCAGATGCTGGTCATGTG-3′ | 94 | 60 | 72 | 45 |
| R | 5′-TTGCACCACAGGTCAAAAG-3′ | |||||
| BDNF/ 89 bp[ | F | 5′GGACATATCCATGACCAGAAAGAAA-3′ | 94 | 60 | 72 | 45 |
| R | 5′GCAACAAACCACAACATTATCGAG-3′ | |||||
| CREB/ 188 bp[ | F | 5′-CTGATTCCCAAAAACGAAGG-3′ | 94 | 60 | 72 | 45 |
| R | 5′-CTGCCCACTGCTAGTTTGGT-3′ | |||||
| GAPDH/309 bp[ | F | 5′- AGATCCACAACGGATACATT—3′ | 94 | 52 | 72 | 30 |
| R | 5′- TCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA—3′ | |||||
| iNOS/ 130 bp[ | F | 5′-GGACCACCTCTATCAGGAA-3′ | 94 | 60 | 72 | 35 |
| R | 5′-CCTCATGATAACGTTTCTGGC-3′ | |||||
| Tau/65 bp[ | F | 5-CGCCAGGAGTTTGACACAATG-3 | 94 | 52.8 | 72 | 40 |
| R | 5-CCTTCTTGGTCTTGGAGCATAGTG-3 | |||||
| TNFα/ 122 bp[ | F | 5′-CTGAACTTCGGGGTGATCGG-3′ | 94 | 60 | 72 | 35 |
| R | 5′-GGCTTGTCACTCGAATTTTGAGA-3′ | |||||
AChE acetylcholine esterase, ADAM-17 A-disintegrin and metalloprotease -17, BDNF brain-derived neurotropic factor, CREB cAMP-response element-binding protein, GAPDH Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, iNOS inducible nitric oxide, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α.
Figure 3Changes in the gene expression of AChE, Tau protein, iNOS and TNF-α in the hippocampus of male rats administered different treatments. (A) PCR analysis showing AChE (123 bp), Tau protein (65 bp), iNOS (130 bp), TNFα (122 bp) and internal control GAPDH (309 bp). (B) A histogram represents the relative intensities of AChE, Tau protein, iNOS and TNFα. The band intensity was quantitated using image-analyzing system (UVitec software). Values represent the mean ± SD of three rats. ANOVA (one-way) followed by Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used (ap ≤ 0.05 vs. Control group and bp ≤ 0.05 vs. SCO group).
Figure 4Changes in the gene expression of ADAM-17, CREB and BDNF in the hippocampus of male rats administered different treatments. (A) PCR analysis showing ADAM17 (400 bp), BDNF (89 bp), CREB (188 bp) and internal control GAPDH (309 bp). (B) A histogram represents the relative intensities of ADAM17, BDNF and CREB. The band intensity was quantitated using image-analyzing system (UVitec software). (C) Heat map distribution of AChE, TAU, iNOS, TNFα, ADAM 17, BDNF, CREB, Serum TC, Serum TG, Brain TC, Brain TG, Brain Phospholipids, Brain AChE, Brain Aβ, Serum TBARS, Brain TBARS, Serum NO, Brain NO, Serum GSH, Brain GSH, Serum, GST, Brain GST, Serum GPx, Brain GPx, Serum SOD, and Brain SOD. The color distributed from blue (low level/expression or activity) to red (high level/expression or activity). Values represent the mean ± SD of three rats. ANOVA (one-way) followed by Least Significant Difference (LSD) was used (ap ≤ 0.05 vs. Control group and bp ≤ 0.05 vs. SCO group).
Figure 5Light micrographs of the brain sections in the hippocampus of male rats stained with H&E: The control group, DP- and FDDP-treated groups (A–C), respectively showed histological normal neurons with vesicular nuclei and conspicuous nucleoli. While the hippocampus of the SCO-treated group (D) showing disorganized hypocellular Pyramidal cell layer and monocytic infiltrate as well as gliosis (*) in the molecular layer. The higher magnification showed granulovacuolar degenerative changes in the form of nuclear hyperchromasia and pyknosis (red arrows) and peri-cellular vacuolization (dashed arrows). The DP + SCO group (E) showing minimal improvement of the cellularity in Pyramidal cell layer and the higher magnification showed an improvement in the neuronal morphology, normal neurons (black arrows) with residual degenerative changes (red arrows). The FDDP + SCO group (F) showed restoration of normal architecture, cellularity and morphology of the hippocampus. The higher magnification showed normal neurons (black arrows) and the degenerative changes are completely disappeared. The DON + SCO group (G) showing minimal improvement of cellularity in the Pyramidal cell layer. The higher magnification showed an improvement in the neuronal morphology, normal neurons (black arrows) with residual degenerative changes (red arrows). C: cortex. P; pyramidal layer. M: molecular layer. B: blood capillaries.