| Literature DB >> 34289907 |
Xiangke Duan1,2, Yanrong Pan2, Zhao Cai2, Yumei Liu2, Yingdan Zhang2, Moxiao Liu2, Yang Liu3, Ke Wang4, Lianhui Zhang5, Liang Yang2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a notorious opportunistic pathogen causing various types of biofilm-related infections. Biofilm formation is a unique microbial strategy that allows P. aeruginosa to survive adverse conditions such as antibiotic treatment and human immune clearance.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilms; Cyclic-di-GMP; Experimental biofilm evolution; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Sigma factor RpoS; Virulence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34289907 PMCID: PMC8293535 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-021-00655-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biosci ISSN: 2045-3701 Impact factor: 7.133
Fig. 1Experimental biofilm evolution of P. aeruginosa under antibiotic stress. A The setup of experimental biofilm evolution of P. aeruginosa. The biofilm of six independent lineages of the P. aeruginosa PAO1 were grown on 5 mm glass bead. After 24 h cultivation, one bead was vortex and sonicated for CFU counts, another bead was transferred to a 24 well microplate and treated with 160 μg/mL imipenem. After 24 h treatment, the surviving cells were grown overnight in fresh medium and start another cycle. B Evolution of biofilm bacteria exposed to imipenem resulted in a rapid increase in biofilm bacteria CFU on bead. C Crystal violet (CV) staining of biofilms formed by ancestral and hyperbiofilm variant strains on PVC plate. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of five biological replicates. Significance was determined using a Student’s t test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. D and E The time frame of emergence of hyperbiofilm variants in linage W1 (D) and W6 (E). The biofilm formation by the different colonies was displayed with CFU of biofilm cells on 5 mm glass bead
Whole genome sequencing data for evolved P. aeruginosa populations
| Strains | Region | Mutation | Mutation effect | Gene | Annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C6W1C | 794674..794675 | AC to GT | D89G | Pf replication initiator protein | |
| 4058162 | G to A | P251L | RNA polymerase sigma factor | ||
| C3W6F | 794674..794675 | AC to GT | G89G | Pf replication initiator protein | |
| 4058118 | G to A | Q266Stop | RNA polymerase sigma factor | ||
| C6W6F | 4058118 | G to A | Q266Stop | RNA polymerase sigma factor |
Fig. 2Hyperbiofilm phenotype is caused by rpoS mutation. rpoS point mutation, full deletion (A) and regions deletion strains (B) were increased the biofilm formation. The biofilm formation by the indicated strains was displayed with CFU of biofilm cells on 5 mm glass bead. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of four biological replicates. Significance was determined using a Student’s t test: ***P < 0.001. EV represents the empty vector pHERD20T in this assay
Fig. 3Hyperbiofilm variants prevail in biofilm competitions. A–F The competition of ancestor and hyperbiofilm variants in planktonic cultures and biofilms when inoculated at the same ratio (A–C) or ancestral: hyperbiofilm mutant = 5:1 (D–F). G Disc diffusion antibiotic sensitivity testing, H growth curves measurement, and I biofilm growth curve was measured. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of four biological replicates. Significance was determined using a Student’s t test: n.s indicates no significant difference (P ≥ 0.05); ***P < 0.001
Fig. 4Expression of P, P and P reporter fusions in rpoS mutants and PAO1 wild-type strain. Relative fluorescence intensity (reflected as GFP/OD600) was measured in representative strains containing the P-gfp (A), rsmY (B) and rsmZ (C) reporter fusions. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of five biological replicates
The expression of GGDEF, EAL, HD-GYP proteins in rpoS mutation and ancestral strains
| ORF | Name | Domain signature | Activity* | RpoSP251L vs Ancestral FC | RpoSQ266stop vs Ancestral FC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PA0169 | GGEEF | DGC | − 2.17 | 3.39E-10 | − 2.21 | 2.09E-10 | |
| PA2572 | YN-GYP | – | 7.12 | 5.02E-202 | 19.45 | 1.16E-234 | |
| PA0847 | GGDEF | DGC | 2.94 | 7.01E-42 | 3.09 | 4.48E-43 | |
| PA1107 | GGEEF | DGC | 2.16 | 3.15E-18 | 2.52 | 3.39E-23 | |
| PA1120 | GGDEF | DGC | 2.27 | 1.85E-19 | 2.85 | 2.19E-27 | |
| PA3343 | GGEEF | DGC | – | – | 2.09 | 1.07E-29 | |
| PA3702 | GGEEF | DGC | 2.17 | 5.79E-25 | 2.55 | 3.33E-34 | |
| PA4929 | GGDEF | DGC | 5.4 | 1.61E-174 | 8.85 | 2.60E-236 | |
| PA0290 | GGEEF | ND | – | – | 2 | 3.72E-17 | |
| PA0575 | GGDEF, EAL | ND | 3.5 | 4.78E-92 | 4.63 | 3.54E-125 | |
| PA1181 | GGDEF, ELL | ND | 3.18 | 3.48E-79 | 3.56 | 3.54E-125 | |
| PA2771 | GGEEF | ND | 3.4 | 2.17E-60 | 4.25 | 4.65E-74 | |
| PA0861 | GGDEF, ELL | PDE | 4.19 | 2.22E-140 | 6.93 | 7.11E-230 | |
| PA2072 | GGDEF, EAL | PDE | 7.55 | 8.41E-222 | 14.62 | 6.89E-293 | |
| PA3311 | AGDEF, EAL | PDE | 7.65 | 6.06E-252 | 13.56 | 1.66E-279 | |
| PA3825 | EVL | PDE | 3 | 9.51E-46 | 3.45 | 9.00E-52 | |
| PA4108 | HD-GYP | PDE | 3.42 | 2.03E-80 | 3.9 | 2.38E-92 | |
| PA4781 | HD-GYP | PDE | 8.8 | 2.99E-306 | 14.18 | 2.78E-130 |
*ND not determined, – not active, FC fold change
Fig. 5rpoS mutations were existed in P. aeruginosa clinical isolates. The distribution of non-synonymous mutation A and the top 5 mutations B on RpoS of P. aeruginosa. 4000 sequences of rpoS were download form pseudomonas genome database, and the non-synonymous mutations were analyzed by CLC Genomics Workbench. C Biofilm formation ability assessment of clinical isolates. A total of 288 clinical isolates from the first affiliated hospital of Guangxi Medical University (shown in black) were analyzed for rpoS mutations and biofilm assays on 96 well PVC plates
Fig. 6Pyocyanin production and virulence are increased in rpoS mutants. The production of pyocyanin (A) and cytotoxicity effect against macrophage cells (B) of P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild-type, RpoSP251L, RpoSQ266stop and ΔrpoS. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of four biological replicates. Significance was determined using a Student’s t test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001