Nina M Tauber1, Robert Zachariae1,2,3, Anders B Jensen2,3, Belinda Thewes4, Ina Skyt2, Emma Elkjaer1, Phyllis N Butow4, Mia S O'Toole1. 1. Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. 2. Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Danish Breast Cancer Group Center for Late Effects (DCCL), Denmark. 4. School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: ConquerFear has been found to effectively reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Group interventions may be particularly effective for the treatment of FCR and could lower overall costs. Our objectives were therefore to adapt ConquerFear into a group format (ConquerFear-Group, CF-G), and to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. METHODS: Eligible patients had completed treatment for breast cancer 3 months to 5 years previously, were ≥18 years, and scored ≥22 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF). The manual was first evaluated with seven patients (Pilot 1), adjusted in accordance with feedback from the patients, therapists, and the original ConquerFear developers. After further evaluation with eight patients (Pilot 2), and subsequent adjustments, the preliminary efficacy of the final manual was evaluated with 27 patients, randomized in blocks to CF-G (N = 13) or active control (AC) (relaxation training) (N = 14) (Pilot 3). The primary outcome was the FCRI total score. Secondary outcomes included general distress, quality-of-life, and process outcomes pertaining to metacognitions, decentering, and worry. All measures were completed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Adjustments of the original ConquerFear manual (Pilot 1 and 2) included changes in the order of treatment components, simplified exercises, and shortened homework. Compared with ACs, CF-G participants reported greater reductions in FCRI total scores from baseline to post-treatment (Hedges's g = 0.59, p = 0.004), 3 months (g = 0.50, p = 0.026), and 6 months later (g = 0.93, p = 0.043). Differences corresponding to medium-to-large effect sizes (Pilot 3). Although non-significant, group differences concerning reductions in general distress and maladaptive metacognitions corresponded to small-to-medium effect sizes (g = 0.40-0.61; ps = 0.40-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: CF-G appears feasible and potentially efficacious in treating FCR in a breast cancer population. These preliminary results are promising but need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE: ConquerFear has been found to effectively reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR). Group interventions may be particularly effective for the treatment of FCR and could lower overall costs. Our objectives were therefore to adapt ConquerFear into a group format (ConquerFear-Group, CF-G), and to evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy. METHODS: Eligible patients had completed treatment for breast cancer 3 months to 5 years previously, were ≥18 years, and scored ≥22 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory-Short Form (FCRI-SF). The manual was first evaluated with seven patients (Pilot 1), adjusted in accordance with feedback from the patients, therapists, and the original ConquerFear developers. After further evaluation with eight patients (Pilot 2), and subsequent adjustments, the preliminary efficacy of the final manual was evaluated with 27 patients, randomized in blocks to CF-G (N = 13) or active control (AC) (relaxation training) (N = 14) (Pilot 3). The primary outcome was the FCRI total score. Secondary outcomes included general distress, quality-of-life, and process outcomes pertaining to metacognitions, decentering, and worry. All measures were completed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3 and 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Adjustments of the original ConquerFear manual (Pilot 1 and 2) included changes in the order of treatment components, simplified exercises, and shortened homework. Compared with ACs, CF-G participants reported greater reductions in FCRI total scores from baseline to post-treatment (Hedges's g = 0.59, p = 0.004), 3 months (g = 0.50, p = 0.026), and 6 months later (g = 0.93, p = 0.043). Differences corresponding to medium-to-large effect sizes (Pilot 3). Although non-significant, group differences concerning reductions in general distress and maladaptive metacognitions corresponded to small-to-medium effect sizes (g = 0.40-0.61; ps = 0.40-0.61). CONCLUSIONS: CF-G appears feasible and potentially efficacious in treating FCR in a breast cancer population. These preliminary results are promising but need to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial.
Authors: Mei Jun Tran; Michael Jefford; Ben Smith; Fiona Lynch; Haryana M Dhillon; Joanne Shaw; Lachlan McDowell; Alan White; Clare Halloran; David Wiesenfeld; Maria Ftanou Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-08-10