Literature DB >> 34288728

Multicentre post-implementation assessment of the positive-predictive value of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-based point-of-care tests used for asymptomatic screening of continuing care staff.

Jamil N Kanji1,2, Dustin T Proctor2,3, William Stokes4,5,6, Byron M Berenger4,2, James Silvius7, Graham Tipples4,8,9, A Mark Joffe6,10, Allison A Venner2,3.   

Abstract

Frequent screening of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic populations using antigen-based point of care tests (APOCT) is occurring globally with limited clinical performance data. The positive predictive value (PPV) of two APOCT used in the asymptomatic screening of SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare workers (HCW) at continuing care (CC) sites across Alberta, Canada was evaluated. Between February 22 and May 2, 2021, CC sites implemented SARS-CoV-2 voluntary screening of their asymptomatic HCW. Onsite testing with Abbott Panbio or BD Veritor occurred on a weekly or twice weekly basis. Positive APOCT were confirmed with a real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) reference method. A total of 71,847 APOCT (17,689 Veritor and 54,158 Panbio) were performed among 369 CC sites. Eighty-seven (0.12%) APOCT were positive, of which 39 (0.05%) confirmed as true positives using rRT-PCR. Use of the Veritor and Panbio resulted in a 76.6% and 30.0% false positive detection, respectively (p<0.001). This corresponded to a 23.4% and 70.0% PPV for the Veritor and Panbio, respectively. Frequent screening of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic HCW in CC, using APOCT, resulted in a very low detection rate and a high detection of false positives. Careful assessment between the risks vs benefits of APOCT programs and prevalence of infection in this population needs to be thoroughly considered before implementation.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34288728     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01411-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Pawana Sharma; Sarah Berhane; Susanna S van Wyk; Nicholas Nyaaba; Julie Domen; Melissa Taylor; Jane Cunningham; Clare Davenport; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Matthew Df McInnes; René Spijker; Jan Y Verbakel; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Ann Van den Bruel; Jonathan J Deeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Oral antivirals for the prevention and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Vicente Soriano; Carmen de-Mendoza; Benson Edagwa; Ana Treviño; Pablo Barreiro; José V Fernandez-Montero; Howard E Gendelman
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing With Real-World Specimens.

Authors:  Ashish Parikh; Lauren Cooper; Daniel Frogel; Kerry Le Benger; Charles K Cooper; Valentin Parvu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.

Authors:  Glenn Patriquin; Jason J LeBlanc; Catherine Williams; Todd F Hatchette; John Ross; Lisa Barrett; Ross Davidson
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.