Literature DB >> 34287820

A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during supraglottic airway insertion and removal.

A J Shrimpton1, F K A Gregson2, J M Brown3, T M Cook4, B R Bzdek2, F Hamilton5, J P Reid2, A E Pickering1.   

Abstract

Many guidelines consider supraglottic airway use to be an aerosol-generating procedure. This status requires increased levels of personal protective equipment, fallow time between cases and results in reduced operating theatre efficiency. Aerosol generation has never been quantitated during supraglottic airway use. To address this evidence gap, we conducted real-time aerosol monitoring (0.3-10-µm diameter) in ultraclean operating theatres during supraglottic airway insertion and removal. This showed very low background particle concentrations (median (IQR [range]) 1.6 (0-3.1 [0-4.0]) particles.l-1 ) against which the patient's tidal breathing produced a higher concentration of aerosol (4.0 (1.3-11.0 [0-44]) particles.l-1 , p = 0.048). The average aerosol concentration detected during supraglottic airway insertion (1.3 (1.0-4.2 [0-6.2]) particles.l-1 , n = 11), and removal (2.1 (0-17.5 [0-26.2]) particles.l-1 , n = 12) was no different to tidal breathing (p = 0.31 and p = 0.84, respectively). Comparison of supraglottic airway insertion and removal with a volitional cough (104 (66-169 [33-326]), n = 27), demonstrated that supraglottic airway insertion/removal sequences produced <4% of the aerosol compared with a single cough (p < 0.001). A transient aerosol increase was recorded during one complicated supraglottic airway insertion (which initially failed to provide a patent airway). Detailed analysis of this event showed an atypical particle size distribution and we subsequently identified multiple sources of non-respiratory aerosols that may be produced during airway management and can be considered as artefacts. These findings demonstrate supraglottic airway insertion/removal generates no more bio-aerosol than breathing and far less than a cough. This should inform the design of infection prevention strategies for anaesthetists and operating theatre staff caring for patients managed with supraglottic airways.
© 2021 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; aerosol-generating procedure; supraglottic airway device

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34287820     DOI: 10.1111/anae.15542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  6 in total

Review 1.  Aerosol-generating procedures and the anaesthetist.

Authors:  C Pope; W Harrop-Griffiths; J Brown
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2021-12-21

2.  Quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during manual facemask ventilation.

Authors:  A J Shrimpton; J M Brown; F K A Gregson; T M Cook; D A Scott; F McGain; R S Humphries; R S Dhillon; J P Reid; F Hamilton; B R Bzdek; A E Pickering
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 12.893

3.  Pre-operative SARS-CoV-2 testing, isolation, vaccination and remote prehabilitation - the road to 'COVID-19 secure' elective surgery.

Authors:  M Charlesworth; R Grossman
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Complications associated with paediatric airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international, multicentre, observational study.

Authors:  M B Peterson; H G Gurnaney; N Disma; C Matava; N Jagannathan; M L Stein; H Liu; P G Kovatsis; B S von Ungern-Sternberg; J E Fiadjoe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 12.893

5.  Anaesthetists' current practice and perceptions of aerosol-generating procedures: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  A J Shrimpton; C E D Osborne; J M Brown; T M Cook; C Penfold; L Rooshenas; A E Pickering
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 12.893

6.  Quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation from upper airway suctioning assessed during tracheal intubation and extubation sequences in anaesthetized patients.

Authors:  A J Shrimpton; J M Brown; T M Cook; C M Penfold; J P Reid; A E Pickering
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 8.944

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.