| Literature DB >> 34285479 |
Chunli Che1, Xiazhong Sun2, Yuhan Wu1, Lixin Ma2, Yueying Hu3, Weiyan Yang3, Hong Qi2, Yumin Zhou4.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this paper was to analyse the influence of atmospheric fine particulate matter (AFPM) and atmospheric microorganisms on the pulmonary microecology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in northeast China.Entities:
Keywords: COPD; atmospheric fine particulate matter; bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; microbe; pulmonary microecology
Year: 2021 PMID: 34285479 PMCID: PMC8286251 DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S314265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis ISSN: 1176-9106
Statistical Analysis of Species Richness and Community Diversity
| Group | Sequence (Total) | aOTU_Num (Total) | Richness | Diversity | Coverage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACE | Chao 1 | Shannon | Simpson | |||||
| A (22 samples) | 903,738 | 10,496 | 615.18 ± 199.45 | 574.43 ± 200.98 | 2.98 ± 1.81 | 0.30 ± 0.30 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| B (26 samples) | 1,064,055 | 22,628 | 1050.33 ±702.58 | 994.17 ± 653.83 | 4.28 ± 1.36 | 0.10 ± 0.14 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| C (10 samples) | 447,448 | 12,544 | 1364.65 ±1024.89 | 1313.83± 995.50 | 3.76 ± 1.78 | 0.16 ± 0.17 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | |
| ANOVA (A, B) | F | 0.201 | 7.1 | 7.878 | 8.372 | 8.149 | 8.59 | 5.623 |
| P | 0.656 | 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.022 | |
| ANOVA (A, C) | F | 0.618 | 12.554 | 11.26 | 11.544 | 1.3 | 1.886 | 0.057 |
| P | 0.438 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.263 | 0.18 | 0.813 | |
| ANOVA (B, C) | F | 0.794 | 1.819 | 1.113 | 1.28 | 0.906 | 0.94 | 0.906 |
| P | 0.379 | 0.186 | 0.299 | 0.266 | 0.348 | 0.339 | 0.348 | |
| ANOVA (A, B, C) | F | 0.708 | 5.894 | 5.397 | 5.74 | 3.916 | 4.756 | 1.86 |
| P | 0.497 | 0.005 | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.026 | 0.012 | 0.165 | |
Note: The P value of ANOVA analysis less than 0.05 is considered to be significant difference.
Abbreviation: aOTU, operational taxonomic units.
Figure 1Sequence length distribution before QC processing for each group, the similarity value > 0.97 indicates that all the selected sequences are of high quality. (A) The sequence length of bacteria before QC in BALF. (B) Sequence length after QC of bacteria in BALF. (C) The sequence length before QC of bacteria in atmospheric fine particles. (D) Sequence length of bacteria after QC in atmospheric fine particles.
Figure 2Relationship between OTU number and cluster similarity value.
Statistical Analysis of Bacterial Taxonomy Annotations in Three Groups
| Group | Phylum | Class | Order | Family | Genus |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 37 | 44 | 127 | 258 | 750 |
| B | 74 | 94 | 153 | 318 | 1015 |
| C | 52 | 148 | 358 | 642 | 1652 |
| ANOVA analysis (A, B, C) | F=6.666 | F=8.483 | F=21.421 | F=17.719 | F=14.986 |
Note: The P value of ANOVA analysis less than 0.05 is considered to be significant difference.
Figure 3Name and composition ratio of the top 20 bacterial colonies in BALF and PM2.5 samples.
Figure 4Name and composition ratio of bacterial colonies with abundance greater than 1% in BALF and PM2.5 samples.
Abundance Distribution Characteristics of Pathogenic Bacteria in PM2.5 Carrier Bands in BALF of COPD Patients
| Bacteria Name | Group C(%) | Group A(%) | Group B(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escherichia/Shigella | 1.83 | 2.30 | 1.13 |
| Pseudomonas | 1.92 | 6.65 | 2.31 |
| Acinetobacter | 1.08 | 1.91 | 0.57 |
| Streptococcus | 0.51 | 5.54 | 6.48 |
| Delftia | 0.73 | 3.45 | 1.45 |
| Methylobacterium | 3.33 | 2.85 | 3.68 |
| Fusobacterium | 1.86 | 1.21 | 1.57 |
| Mycoplasma | 0.77 | 0.09 | 3.03 |
| Rothia | 0.81 | 0.47 | 2.24 |
| Prevotella | 0.08 | 0.84 | 3.89 |
| Klebsiella pneumoniae | 0.034 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Gardnerella vaginalis | 0.029 | 0.07 | 0.73 |
| Enterobacter | 0.017 | 1.12 | 1.73 |
| Serratia marcescens | 0.009 | 0.09 | 0.65 |
| Rickettsiaceae | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.41 |
| Yersinia enterocolitica | 0.002 | 0.01 | 0.052 |
| Chlamydia trachomatis | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.43 |
| Bacillus cereus | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 |
| Fusobacterium | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| Brucella | 0.007 | <0.001 | 0.62 |
Figure 5The abundance and difference analysis of bacterial gene functional characteristics are in group A and group B.
Figure 6Function category difference graph. The left side of the figure shows the abundance ratio of different functional genes in the two groups of samples, the middle side shows the difference ratio of functional genes in the 95% confidence interval, and the right side shows the P value. Functional genes with P < 0.05 were marked in red, indicating significant differences. Only the 25 functional genes with the lowest P values are listed in the figure.