Literature DB >> 34285086

Bidirectional Regulatory Cross-Talk between Cell Context and Genomic Aberrations Shapes Breast Tumorigenesis.

Brijesh Kumar1, Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri1, Calli Maguire2, Max Jacobsen2, Constance J Temm2, George Sandusky2, Harikrishna Nakshatri3,4,5.   

Abstract

Breast cancers are classified into five intrinsic subtypes and 10 integrative clusters based on gene expression patterns and genomic aberrations, respectively. Although the cell-of-origin, adaptive plasticity, and genomic aberrations shape dynamic transcriptomic landscape during cancer progression, how interplay between these three core elements governs obligatory steps for a productive cancer progression is unknown. Here, we used genetic ancestry-mapped immortalized breast epithelial cell lines generated from breast biopsies of healthy women that share gene expression profiles of luminal A, normal-like, and basal-like intrinsic subtypes of breast cancers and breast cancer relevant oncogenes to develop breast cancer progression model. Using flow cytometry, mammosphere growth, signaling pathway, DNA damage response, and in vivo tumorigenicity assays, we provide evidence that establishes cell context-dependent effects of oncogenes in conferring plasticity, self-renewal/differentiation, intratumor heterogeneity, and metastatic properties. In contrast, oncogenic aberrations, independent of cell context, shaped response to DNA damage-inducing agents. Collectively, this study reveals how the same set of genomic aberration can have distinct effects on tumor characteristics based on cell-of-origin of tumor and highlights the need to utilize multiple "normal" epithelial cell types to decipher oncogenic properties of a gene of interest. In addition, by creating multiple isogenic cell lines ranging from primary cells to metastatic variants, we provide resources to elucidate cell-intrinsic properties and cell-oncogene interactions at various stages of cancer progression. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings demonstrate that how an interplay between the normal cell type that encountered genomic aberrations and type of genomic aberration influences heterogeneity, self-renewal/differentiation, and tumor properties including propensity for metastasis. ©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34285086      PMCID: PMC8568628          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-21-0163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  46 in total

1.  Identification of multipotent mammary stem cells by protein C receptor expression.

Authors:  Daisong Wang; Cheguo Cai; Xiaobing Dong; Qing Cissy Yu; Xiao-Ou Zhang; Li Yang; Yi Arial Zeng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  B Elenbaas; L Spirio; F Koerner; M D Fleming; D B Zimonjic; J L Donaher; N C Popescu; W C Hahn; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Intratumor heterogeneity: seeing the wood for the trees.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Marco Gerlinger; P Andrew Futreal; Lajos Pusztai; Charles Swanton
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Dual TGFβ/BMP Pathway Inhibition Enables Expansion and Characterization of Multiple Epithelial Cell Types of the Normal and Cancerous Breast.

Authors:  Mayuri Prasad; Brijesh Kumar; Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri; Manjushree Anjanappa; George Sandusky; Kathy D Miller; Anna Maria Storniolo; Harikrishna Nakshatri
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Elgene Lim; François Vaillant; Di Wu; Natasha C Forrest; Bhupinder Pal; Adam H Hart; Marie-Liesse Asselin-Labat; David E Gyorki; Teresa Ward; Audrey Partanen; Frank Feleppa; Lily I Huschtscha; Heather J Thorne; Stephen B Fox; Max Yan; Juliet D French; Melissa A Brown; Gordon K Smyth; Jane E Visvader; Geoffrey J Lindeman
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  The Genomic Landscape of Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seth A Wander; Ofir Cohen; Xueqian Gong; Gabriela N Johnson; Jorge E Buendia-Buendia; Maxwell R Lloyd; Dewey Kim; Flora Luo; Pingping Mao; Karla Helvie; Kailey J Kowalski; Utthara Nayar; Adrienne G Waks; Stephen H Parsons; Ricardo Martinez; Lacey M Litchfield; Xiang S Ye; Chunping Yu; Valerie M Jansen; John R Stille; Patricia S Smith; Gerard J Oakley; Quincy S Chu; Gerald Batist; Melissa E Hughes; Jill D Kremer; Levi A Garraway; Eric P Winer; Sara M Tolaney; Nancy U Lin; Sean G Buchanan; Nikhil Wagle
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 8.  Mammary stem cells and the differentiation hierarchy: current status and perspectives.

Authors:  Jane E Visvader; John Stingl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Robust and interpretable PAM50 reclassification exhibits survival advantage for myoepithelial and immune phenotypes.

Authors:  James C Mathews; Saad Nadeem; Arnold J Levine; Maryam Pouryahya; Joseph O Deasy; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-09-09

10.  DNA methylation outliers in normal breast tissue identify field defects that are enriched in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew E Teschendorff; Yang Gao; Allison Jones; Matthias Ruebner; Matthias W Beckmann; David L Wachter; Peter A Fasching; Martin Widschwendter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Tumor collection/processing under physioxia uncovers highly relevant signaling networks and drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Brijesh Kumar; Adedeji K Adebayo; Mayuri Prasad; Maegan L Capitano; Ruizhong Wang; Poornima Bhat-Nakshatri; Manjushree Anjanappa; Edward Simpson; Duojiao Chen; Yunlong Liu; Jeanne M Schilder; Austyn B Colter; Callista Maguire; Constance J Temm; George Sandusky; Emma H Doud; Aruna B Wijeratne; Amber L Mosley; Hal E Broxmeyer; Harikrishna Nakshatri
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  FAM83A is a potential biomarker for breast cancer initiation.

Authors:  Natascia Marino; Rana German; Ram Podicheti; Pam Rockey; George E Sandusky; Constance J Temm; Harikrishna Nakshatri; Rebekah J Addison; Bryce Selman; Sandra K Althouse; Anna Maria V Storniolo
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2022-02-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.