Literature DB >> 3428314

Recognition of random shapes in brain-damaged patients.

A Glöckner-Rist1, K Gutbrod, R Cohen.   

Abstract

In two experiments the hypothesis was tested that left hemisphere-damaged patients and especially those with aphasia are impaired in the recognition of meaningless random shapes because they fail to attribute a meaning to the shapes. In a multiple choice recognition task, left hemisphere-damaged patients with aphasia and left and right hemisphere-damaged patients without aphasia were shown complex random shapes together with either a pictorial cue (experiment I and II) or a dotted drawing of its outline on which more or less outstanding parts were specially marked (experiment I). In experiment I no difference between conditions or groups emerged. In experiment II aphasics and left hemisphere-damaged patients without aphasia were generally inferior to right hemisphere-damaged controls and performed significantly better when a pictorial cue was given than when it was absent, however only when the conditions were given in a certain order.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3428314     DOI: 10.1007/BF00385664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0175-758X


  27 in total

1.  Focal hemisphere and visuoperceptual categorization.

Authors:  E Bisiach; E Capitani; H Spinnler
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired associates training.

Authors:  J M VANDERPLAS; E A GARVIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-03

3.  The association value of random shapes.

Authors:  J M VANDERPLAS; E A GARVIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-03

4.  Right temporal-lobe damage. Perception of unfamiliar stimuli after damage.

Authors:  D KIMURA
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1963-03

5.  Complexity as a determinant of visual field effects for random forms.

Authors:  H J Hannay; J P Rogers; R F Durant
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1976-02

6.  Does the hemisphere stimulated play a specific role in delayed recognition of complex abstract patterns? A tachistoscopic study.

Authors:  L Bevilacqua; E Capitani; C Luzzatti; H R Spinnler
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Hemispheric memory for random forms revisited.

Authors:  J M Polich
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Visual laterality patterns for pure- versus mixed-list presentation.

Authors:  J B Hellige
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Verbal and nonverbal recognition memory in aphasic and nonaphasic stroke patients.

Authors:  W H Riege; E J Metter; W R Hanson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Transfer of predifferentiation training to gradients of generalization in shape recognition.

Authors:  H C Ellis; R L Feuge
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.