Literature DB >> 34283080

A Comparison of Three Neural Network Approaches for Estimating Joint Angles and Moments from Inertial Measurement Units.

Marion Mundt1, William R Johnson2, Wolfgang Potthast3, Bernd Markert4, Ajmal Mian5, Jacqueline Alderson1,6.   

Abstract

The application of artificial intelligence techniques to wearable sensor data may facilitate accurate analysis outside of controlled laboratory settings-the holy grail for gait clinicians and sports scientists looking to bridge the lab to field divide. Using these techniques, parameters that are difficult to directly measure in-the-wild, may be predicted using surrogate lower resolution inputs. One example is the prediction of joint kinematics and kinetics based on inputs from inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Despite increased research, there is a paucity of information examining the most suitable artificial neural network (ANN) for predicting gait kinematics and kinetics from IMUs. This paper compares the performance of three commonly employed ANNs used to predict gait kinematics and kinetics: multilayer perceptron (MLP); long short-term memory (LSTM); and convolutional neural networks (CNN). Overall high correlations between ground truth and predicted kinematic and kinetic data were found across all investigated ANNs. However, the optimal ANN should be based on the prediction task and the intended use-case application. For the prediction of joint angles, CNNs appear favourable, however these ANNs do not show an advantage over an MLP network for the prediction of joint moments. If real-time joint angle and joint moment prediction is desirable an LSTM network should be utilised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  joint kinematics; joint kinetics; machine learning; wearable sensors

Year:  2021        PMID: 34283080     DOI: 10.3390/s21134535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  3 in total

1.  Predicting knee adduction moment response to gait retraining with minimal clinical data.

Authors:  Nataliya Rokhmanova; Katherine J Kuchenbecker; Peter B Shull; Reed Ferber; Eni Halilaj
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 2.  Inertial Motion Capture-Based Wearable Systems for Estimation of Joint Kinetics: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chang June Lee; Jung Keun Lee
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Predicting Knee Joint Kinematics from Wearable Sensor Data in People with Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Considerations for Future Machine Learning Models.

Authors:  Jay-Shian Tan; Sawitchaya Tippaya; Tara Binnie; Paul Davey; Kathryn Napier; J P Caneiro; Peter Kent; Anne Smith; Peter O'Sullivan; Amity Campbell
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.