| Literature DB >> 34282934 |
Wei Fan1,2,3, Hui Kan1,2,3, Hai-Yan Liu4, Tian-Lei Wang1,2,3, Yi-Ning He1,2,3, Miao Zhang1,2,3, Ya-Xin Li1,2,3, Yi-Jie Li1,2,3, Wei Meng1, Qing Li5, An-Qun Hu4, Ying-Jie Zheng1,2,3.
Abstract
The influence of human genetic variants on the vaginal bacterial traits (VBTs) of pregnant women is still unknown. Using a genome-wide association approach based on the 16S rRNA bacteriome analysis, a total of 72 host genetic variant (single nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs], indels, or copy number variations [CNVs])-VBT associations were found that reached the genome-wide significance level (P < 5 × 10-8) with an acceptable genomic inflation factor λ of <1.1. The majority of these SNPs that reached the genome-wide significance level had a relatively low minor allele frequency (MAF), and only seven of them had MAFs greater than 0.05. rs303212, located at the IFIT1 gene on chromosome 10, was the most eye-catching variant, which had a genome-wide association with the relative abundance (RAB) of Actinobacteria and Bifidobacteriaceae and also had a suggestive association with the RAB of a few common vaginal bacteria including Actinobacteriota, Firmicutes, Lactobacillus, and Gardnerella vaginalis and the beta diversity weighted UniFrac (P < 1 × 10-5). The findings of the study suggest that the vaginal bacteriome may be influenced by a number of genetic variants across the human genome and that interferon signaling may have an important influence on vaginal bacterial communities during pregnancy. IMPORTANCE Knowledge about the influence of host genetics on the vaginal bacteriome in pregnancy is still limited. Although a number of environmental and behavioral factors may exert influences on the structure of vaginal bacterial communities, the vaginal bacteriome often undergoes a relatively fixed transition to a more stable and less diverse state as the menstrual cycle stops, which raises questions on the effects of human genetics. We utilized a genome-wide approach to identify the associations between genetic variants and multiple VBTs and performed enrichment analyses. The human genetics during pregnancy may be involved in multiple pathways. The results may disclose innate functional factors involved in shaping the vaginal bacteriome during pregnancy and provide insight into the establishment of specific strategies for prevention and clinical treatment of pregnancy complications.Entities:
Keywords: 16S amplicon; bacteriome; genetic variants; microbiome; pregnant women; vaginal bacterial traits
Year: 2021 PMID: 34282934 PMCID: PMC8407429 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00158-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1Heatmap and cladogram of vaginal bacterial composition among different community state type (CST) groups at species level. (a) The heatmap of vaginal bacterial composition in each CST group. The shading represents the level of relative abundance (RAB) of a given taxon. (b) The cladogram of vaginal bacterial taxa in different CST groups. The size of yellow dots shows the read rank of each species, and the transparency of colored squares around each internal circle indicates its RAB level. The bars outside the circle represent the original reads of the corresponding taxon on a log10 scale.
FIG 5The associations between rs303212 and common bacterial taxa (Bifidobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus). (a) The partial allele effect of rs303212 on the RAB of Bifidobacteriaceae given adjusted covariates including first-time pregnancy status, baseline gestational age, and 10 SNP-PCs. (b) The partial allele effect of rs303212 on the RAB of Lactobacillus given adjusted covariates including first-time pregnancy status, baseline gestational age, and 10 SNP-PCs. (c) locuszoom plot for rs303212 with respect to the RAB of Bifidobacteriaceae within a ±250-kb window using the imputed 1000 Genomes Project phase 3 reference panel data.
FIG 2The association between single genetic polymorphisms (SNPs) and the vaginal bacterial taxa in pregnant women (λ < 1.1). All the SNPs that reached the suggestive significance level (P < 1 × 10−5) were shown in the plots, but only those with P values lower than 1 × 10−6 were highlighted with a relatively low transparency in filled colors and annotated with variant labels. The left panel shows the significant SNPs (P < 1 × 10−5) and their corresponding positions on different chromosomes, whereas the right panel shows the number of suggestively significant markers on each chromosome accordingly. The background color represents different taxonomic levels of each bacterial taxon. Covariates including the first-time pregnancy status, baseline GA, and 10 SNP-PCs were adjusted. (a) The associations between host SNPs and the binary VBTs including P/A and D/ND of a taxon given its distribution in study samples. Text in bold red indicates that the dominance of the taxon was studied, whereas the P/A trait was studied for the remaining taxa. (b) The associations between host SNPs and the RAB of vaginal bacterial taxa.
FIG 3The association between single genetic polymorphisms (SNPs) and the bacterial diversity metrics in pregnant women (λ < 1.1). All the SNPs that reached the suggestive significance level (P < 1 × 10−5) were shown in the plots, but only those with P values lower than 1 × 10−6 were highlighted with a relatively low transparency in filled colors and annotated with variant labels. The left panel shows the significant SNPs (P < 1 × 10−5) and their corresponding positions on different chromosomes, whereas the right panel shows the number of suggestively significant markers on each chromosome accordingly. Covariates including the first-time pregnancy status, baseline GA, and 10 SNP-PCs were adjusted. (a) The associations between host SNPs and the alpha diversity metrics. (b) The associations between host SNPs and the beta diversity metrics by MANOVA.
FIG 4The association between copy number variations (CNVs) and the RAB of vaginal bacterial taxa in pregnant women (λ < 1.1). All the CNVs that reached the suggestive significance level (P < 1 × 10−5) were shown in the plots, but only those with P values lower than 1 × 10−6 were highlighted with a relatively low transparency in filled colors and annotated with variant labels. The left panel shows the significant SNPs (P < 1 × 10−5) and their corresponding positions (center of CNV) on different chromosomes, whereas the right panel shows the number of suggestively significant markers on each chromosome accordingly. The background color represents different taxonomic levels of each bacterial taxon. Covariates including the first-time pregnancy status, baseline GA, and 10 CNV-PCs were adjusted.