Literature DB >> 34282160

Obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool predicts composite maternal morbidity.

Emer L Colalillo1, Andrew D Sparks2, Jaclyn M Phillips3, Chinelo L Onyilofor4, Homa K Ahmadzia5.   

Abstract

Obstetric hemorrhage is one of the leading preventable causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Although hemorrhage risk-prediction models exist, there remains a gap in literature describing if these risk-prediction tools can identify composite maternal morbidity. We investigate how well an established obstetric hemorrhage risk-assessment tool predicts composite hemorrhage-associated morbidity. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of a multicenter database including women admitted to Labor and Delivery from 2016 to 2018, at centers implementing the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric, and Neonatal Nurses risk assessment tool on admission. A composite morbidity score incorporated factors including obstetric hemorrhage (estimated blood loss ≥ 1000 mL), blood transfusion, or ICU admission. Out of 56,903 women, 14,803 (26%) were categorized as low-risk, 26,163 (46%) as medium-risk and 15,937 (28%) as high-risk for obstetric hemorrhage. Composite morbidity occurred at a rate of 2.2%, 8.0% and 11.9% within these groups, respectively. Medium- and high-risk groups had an increased combined risk of composite morbidity (diagnostic OR 4.58; 4.09-5.13) compared to the low-risk group. This established hemorrhage risk-assessment tool predicts clinically-relevant composite morbidity. Future randomized trials in obstetric hemorrhage can incorporate these tools for screening patients at highest risk for composite morbidity.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34282160     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93413-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of Risk-Assessment Tools for Severe Postpartum Hemorrhage in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Neggin Mokhtari; Jim C Huang; Helain J Landy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Comparison of outcome between intrauterine balloon tamponade and uterine artery embolization in the management of persistent postpartum hemorrhage: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Paul I Ramler; Dacia D C A Henriquez; Thomas van den Akker; Camila Caram-Deelder; Rolf H H Groenwold; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Jos van Roosmalen; Jan M M van Lith; Johanna G van der Bom
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Prediction of postpartum hemorrhage in women with gestational hypertension or mild preeclampsia at term.

Authors:  Corine M Koopmans; Karin van der Tuuk; Henk Groen; Johannes P R Doornbos; Irene M de Graaf; Pauline C M van der Salm; Martina M Porath; Simone M I Kuppens; Ella J Wijnen; Robert Aardenburg; Aren J van Loon; Bettina M C Akerboom; Peggy J A van der Lans; Ben W J Mol; Maria G van Pampus
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Changes in care associated with the introduction of a postpartum hemorrhage patient safety program.

Authors:  Justin R Lappen; Dominika Seidman; Carol Burke; Kris Goetz; William A Grobman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Hemorrhage Risk Assessment on Admission: Utility for Prediction of Maternal Morbidity.

Authors:  Homa K Ahmadzia; Jaclyn M Phillips; Rose Kleiman; Alexis C Gimovsky; Susan Bathgate; Naomi L C Luban; Richard L Amdur
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.079

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.