Literature DB >> 34282033

International differences in lung cancer survival by sex, histological type and stage at diagnosis: an ICBP SURVMARK-2 Study.

Marzieh Araghi1, Miranda Fidler-Benaoudia2, Melina Arnold1, Mark Rutherford1,3, Aude Bardot1, Jacques Ferlay1, Oliver Bucher4, Prithwish De5, Gerda Engholm6, Anna Gavin7, Serena Kozie8, Alana Little9, Bjørn Møller10, Nathalie St Jacques11, Hanna Tervonen9, Paul Walsh12, Ryan Woods13,14, Dianne L O'Connell15, David Baldwin16, Mark Elwood17, Sabine Siesling18, Freddie Bray1, Isabelle Soerjomataram19.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer has a poor prognosis that varies internationally when assessed by the two major histological subgroups (non-small cell (NSCLC) and small cell (SCLC)).
METHOD: 236 114 NSCLC and 43 167 SCLC cases diagnosed during 2010-2014 in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway and the UK were included in the analyses. One-year and 3-year age-standardised net survival (NS) was estimated by sex, histological type, stage and country.
RESULTS: One-year and 3-year NS was consistently higher for Canada and Norway, and lower for the UK, New Zealand and Ireland, irrespective of stage at diagnosis. Three-year NS for NSCLC ranged from 19.7% for the UK to 27.1% for Canada for men and was consistently higher for women (25.3% in the UK; 35.0% in Canada) partly because men were diagnosed at more advanced stages. International differences in survival for NSCLC were largest for regional stage and smallest at the advanced stage. For SCLC, 3-year NS also showed a clear female advantage with the highest being for Canada (13.8% for women; 9.1% for men) and Norway (12.8% for women; 9.7% for men).
CONCLUSION: Distribution of stage at diagnosis among lung cancer cases differed by sex, histological subtype and country, which may partly explain observed survival differences. Yet, survival differences were also observed within stages, suggesting that quality of treatment, healthcare system factors and prevalence of comorbid conditions may also influence survival. Other possible explanations include differences in data collection practice, as well as differences in histological verification, staging and coding across jurisdictions. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histology/Cytology; Lung Cancer; Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Small Cell Lung Cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34282033     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-216555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  4 in total

1.  Variation in suspected cancer referral pathways in primary care: comparative analysis across the International Benchmarking Cancer Partnership.

Authors:  Charlotte Lynch; Samantha Harrison; Jon D Emery; Cathy Clelland; Laurence Dorman; Claire Collins; May-Lill Johansen; Ross Lawrenson; Alun Surgey; David Weller; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.302

Review 2.  Value of carbon-ion radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hanguang Ruan; Juan Xiong
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-14

3.  Sex differences in the characteristics and survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective analytical study based on real-world clinical data of the Korean population.

Authors:  Da Som Jeon; Jin Woo Kim; Seul Gi Kim; Hyeong Ryul Kim; Si Yeol Song; Jae Cheol Lee; Wonjun Ji; Chang-Min Choi; Ho Cheol Kim
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Obtaining long-term stage-specific relative survival estimates in the presence of incomplete historical stage information.

Authors:  Rachael Stannard; Paul C Lambert; Therese M-L Andersson; Mark J Rutherford
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 9.075

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.