Literature DB >> 34281611

Effects of lower extremity constraint-induced movement therapy on gait and balance of chronic hemiparetic patients after stroke: description of a study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Elaine Menezes-Oliveira1,2, Gabriela da Silva Matuti3, Clarissa Barros de Oliveira3, Simone Ferreira de Freitas3, Catia Miyuki Kawamura4, José Augusto Fernandes Lopes4, Ricardo Mario Arida5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protocols involving intensive practice have shown positive outcomes. Constraint induced movement therapy (CIT) appears to be one of the best options for better outcomes in upper limb rehabilitation, but we still have little data about lower extremity constraint-induced movement therapy (LE-CIT) and its effects on gait and balance.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of an LE-CIT protocol on gait functionality and balance in chronic hemiparetic patients following a stroke.
METHODS: The study adopts a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study design. Forty-two patients, who suffered a stroke, who were in the chronic phase of recovery (>6 months), with gait disability (no community gait), and who were able to walk at least 10 m with or without the advice or support of 1 person, will be randomly allocated to 2 groups: the LE-CIT group or the control group (intensive conventional therapy). People will be excluded if they have speech deficits that render them unable to understand and/or answer properly to evaluation scales and exercises selected for the protocol and/or if they have suffered any clinical event between the screening and the beginning of the protocol. Outcome will be assessed at baseline (T0), immediately after the intervention (T1), and after 6 months (T2). The outcome measures chosen for this trial are as follows: 6-min walk test (6minWT), 10-m walk test (10mWT), timed up and go (TUG), 3-D gait analysis (3DGA), Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), and as a secondary measure, Lower Extremity Motor Activity Log will be evaluated (LE-MAL). The participants in both groups will receive 15 consecutive days of daily exercise. The participants in the LE-CIT group will be submitted to this protocol 2.5 h/day for 15 consecutive days. It will include (1) intensive supervised training, (2) use of shaping as strategy for motor training, and (3) application of a transfer package (plus 30 min). The control group will receive conventional physiotherapy for 2.5 h/day over 15 consecutive days (the same period as the CIT intervention). Repeated measures analyses will be made to compare differences and define clinically relevant changes between groups.
RESULTS: Data collection is currently on-going and results are expected in 2021. DISCUSSION: LE-CIT seems to be a good protocol for inclusion into stroke survivors' rehabilitation as it has all the components needed for positive results, as well as intensity and transference of gains to daily life activities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br RBR-467cv6 . Registered on 10 October 2017. "Effects of Lower Extremities - Constraint Induced Therapy on gait and balance function in chronic hemipretic post-stroke patients".
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance; Constraint-induced movement therapy; Gait; Hemiparesis; Stroke

Year:  2021        PMID: 34281611     DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05424-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  40 in total

1.  Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs.

Authors:  H D KNAPP; E TAUB; A J BERMAN
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Harnessing brain plasticity through behavioral techniques to produce new treatments in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Edward Taub
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2004-11

Review 3.  Global Burden of Stroke.

Authors:  Valery L Feigin; Bo Norrving; George A Mensah
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Physical therapy interventions for patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Authors:  Diane U Jette; Nancy K Latham; Randall J Smout; Julie Gassaway; Mary D Slavin; Susan D Horn
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Henk T Hendricks; Jacques van Limbeek; Alexander C Geurts; Machiel J Zwarts
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke.

Authors:  A T Patel; P W Duncan; S M Lai; S Studenski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; Robert Côté; Liam Durcan; Joseph Carlton
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population.

Authors:  J Perry; M Garrett; J K Gronley; S J Mulroy
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Constraint-induced therapy approach to restoring function after neurological injury.

Authors:  D M Morris; E Taub
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.