Yingkai Hong1, Mingen Lin1, Dehua Ou1,2, Zhuangkai Huang1,2, Peilin Shen3. 1. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People's Republic of China, 515041. 2. Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, People's Republic of China, 515041. plshen@stu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is still highly aggressive and lethal even with various therapeutic approaches. As the kidney is an iron metabolism-related organ, exploring and assessing the clinical value of ferroptosis, an iron-dependent regulated cell death, is practical and important. METHODS: Prognostic ferroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from the KIRC cohort in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database, from which a prognostic signature was established using Lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis. Each patient in the KIRC cohort and the E-MTAB-1980 cohort (from the ArrayExpress database) was assigned a calculated signature-correlated risk score and categorized to be either in the high- or low-risk group divided by the median risk score in the KIRC cohort. Then, the independent prognostic value of the signature was further assessed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Cox regression analyses based on overall survival (OS) in both cohorts. Finally, risk-related DEGs were identified in both cohorts and subjected to enrichment analyses for Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and immune infiltration. RESULTS: Among 60 ferroptosis-related genes, 32 prognostic DEGs were identified, from which we constructed a prognostic 12-gene signature with CARS1, HMGCR, CHAC1, GOT1, CD44, STEAP3, AKR1C1, CBS, DPP4, FANCD2, SLC1A5 and NCOA4. Patients in both cohorts were divided into high- and low-risk groups, which were visually distributed in two sets and had positive-risk-related mortality. The K-M survival and the ROC curves validated that the signature has prognostic value with P < 0.05 and area under the curve > 0.7 in both cohorts, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression further confirmed the risk score as an independent prognostic predictor for OS. Commonly enriched terms in GO and KEGG not only showed a high iron correlation but also, interestingly, immune relevance of 3 immune cells (macrophages, mast cells and regulatory T cells) and 1 immune-related function (antigen processing cell co-stimulation). CONCLUSION: We established a novel 12 ferroptosis-related-gene signature that was proven to be an independent prognostic predictor for OS and inferred to be related to tumour immunity in ccRCC; however, the underlying mechanism is still poorly characterized and needs further exploration.
BACKGROUND:Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is still highly aggressive and lethal even with various therapeutic approaches. As the kidney is an iron metabolism-related organ, exploring and assessing the clinical value of ferroptosis, an iron-dependent regulated cell death, is practical and important. METHODS: Prognostic ferroptosis-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified from the KIRC cohort in the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) database, from which a prognostic signature was established using Lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis. Each patient in the KIRC cohort and the E-MTAB-1980 cohort (from the ArrayExpress database) was assigned a calculated signature-correlated risk score and categorized to be either in the high- or low-risk group divided by the median risk score in the KIRC cohort. Then, the independent prognostic value of the signature was further assessed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Cox regression analyses based on overall survival (OS) in both cohorts. Finally, risk-related DEGs were identified in both cohorts and subjected to enrichment analyses for Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and immune infiltration. RESULTS: Among 60 ferroptosis-related genes, 32 prognostic DEGs were identified, from which we constructed a prognostic 12-gene signature with CARS1, HMGCR, CHAC1, GOT1, CD44, STEAP3, AKR1C1, CBS, DPP4, FANCD2, SLC1A5 and NCOA4. Patients in both cohorts were divided into high- and low-risk groups, which were visually distributed in two sets and had positive-risk-related mortality. The K-M survival and the ROC curves validated that the signature has prognostic value with P < 0.05 and area under the curve > 0.7 in both cohorts, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression further confirmed the risk score as an independent prognostic predictor for OS. Commonly enriched terms in GO and KEGG not only showed a high iron correlation but also, interestingly, immune relevance of 3 immune cells (macrophages, mast cells and regulatory T cells) and 1 immune-related function (antigen processing cell co-stimulation). CONCLUSION: We established a novel 12 ferroptosis-related-gene signature that was proven to be an independent prognostic predictor for OS and inferred to be related to tumour immunity in ccRCC; however, the underlying mechanism is still poorly characterized and needs further exploration.
Authors: Scott J Dixon; Kathryn M Lemberg; Michael R Lamprecht; Rachid Skouta; Eleina M Zaitsev; Caroline E Gleason; Darpan N Patel; Andras J Bauer; Alexandra M Cantley; Wan Seok Yang; Barclay Morrison; Brent R Stockwell Journal: Cell Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Srinivasa R Prasad; Peter A Humphrey; Jay R Catena; Vamsi R Narra; John R Srigley; Arthur D Cortez; Neal C Dalrymple; Kedar N Chintapalli Journal: Radiographics Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Wan Seok Yang; Rohitha SriRamaratnam; Matthew E Welsch; Kenichi Shimada; Rachid Skouta; Vasanthi S Viswanathan; Jaime H Cheah; Paul A Clemons; Alykhan F Shamji; Clary B Clish; Lewis M Brown; Albert W Girotti; Virginia W Cornish; Stuart L Schreiber; Brent R Stockwell Journal: Cell Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Shumei Ma; Rebecca F Dielschneider; Elizabeth S Henson; Wenyan Xiao; Tricia R Choquette; Anna R Blankstein; Yongqiang Chen; Spencer B Gibson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 3.240