Literature DB >> 34281512

Knowledge and attitude on prevention of COVID-19 among community health workers in Nepal-a cross-sectional study.

Amul Shrestha1,2, Tek Bahadur Thapa3,4, Mahendra Giri3,5, Sanjiv Kumar3, Sakil Dhobi3,6, Haikali Thapa3,7, Pawan Prakash Dhami3, Arun Shahi3,8, Ajita Ghimire3, Ela Singh Rathaur3,9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging and reemerging pathogens are global challenges for public health and the pandemic of Coronavirus disease 2019is a reemerging case of an infectious disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corornavirus-2. Health care worker worldwide are at higher risk worldwide and the situation is the same in Nepal. The knowledge and attitude of health workers will certainly mark the outcome towards this pandemic. So, this study aims to assess the knowledge and attitude of community health workers towards the prevention of COVID-19 virus.
METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out among the community health workers of various provinces of Nepal. A semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire was prepared in Google form and circulated to the sampled health workers through various social media platforms like face book, messenger, Instagram and g-mails. A total of 650 invitations were send and among them 420 responded and among them only 399 provided complete response. Responses containing anonymized data was collected analyzed in using SPSS-version-20. The results were interpreted and was checked with various demographic and enabling factors using chi-square test and logistic regression model. Also, ethical approval was taken from NHRC (Nepal Health Research Council (protocol registration number: 360/2020P) prior to the conduction of study.
RESULTS: Out the total sample size of 450, we took 399 responses taking into consideration all the inclusion criteria. So, from 399 valid response, 230 (47.6%) were males and 169 (42.4%) were females. 380 (95.2%) employed participants thought that wearing PPE will reduce the chances of getting COVID-19, majority of the participants 80.5% (321) responded that COVID-19 will successfully be controlled and staffs receiving excellent support from palika had high knowledge level. Knowledge level was significantly associated with the enabling factor "support from palika" (P = 0.045).45.9% of the respondents had no availability of COVID-19 response medical items for prevention of COVID-19 at their respective health facilities. Also the logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of knowledge level was 2 times higher (AOR=1.913 at 95% CI: 1.266-2.891) compared to the female participants (Ref- female).
CONCLUSIONS: Proper and adequate knowledge and attitude towards COVID-19 is a paramount in the prevention and control of SARS-COV-2. Health care workers are knowledgeable about COVID-19 and are proactively practicing the preventive measures to minimize the spread of infection but some lack optimistic attitude. Hence, the constantly updated educational programs related to COVID-19 will surely contribute to improving the healthcare workers knowledge and attitude towards COVID-19.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community health care workers (HCW’s); Enabling factors; Knowledge and attitude; Palika (rural/ urban municipalities and metropolitan city)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34281512      PMCID: PMC8287280          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11400-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


Background

Emerging and reemerging pathogens are global challenges for public health [1]. Corona viruses are enveloped RNA viruses that are distributed broadly among humans, other mammals, and birds and causes respiratory, enteric, hepatic, and neurologic diseases [2, 3]. Six coronavirus species are known to cause human disease [4]. Four viruses 229E, OC43, NL63, and HKU1 are prevalent and typically cause common cold symptoms in immunocompromised individuals [4]. The two other strains, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus (MERS-CoV) are zoonotic in origin and have been linked to sometimes fatal illness [5]. Corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious respiratory disease which is caused by newly recognized corona virus [5-7]. Given the high prevalence and wide distribution of corona viruses, the large genetic diversity and frequent recombination of their genomes, and increasing human–animal interface activities, novel corona viruses are likely to emerge periodically in humans owing to frequent cross-species infections and occasional spillover events [5, 8, 9]. In late December 2019, several local health facilities reported clusters of patients with pneumonia of unknown cause that were epidemiologically linked to a seafood and wet animal wholesale market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China [10]. In January 2020, the outbreak of the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China spread progressively to other countries [11, 12], with WHO declaring it a Public Health Emergency of International Concern [13]. Among the affected 200 countries globally (where 2,074,529 confirm cases and 139,378 deaths were reported as of April; and 23,560 confirm cases and 586 deaths South East Asia region including Nepal [14]. On 23rd January 2020, the first case was reported for COVID-19 in Nepal and now (21st Sept 2020), the data hiked at 64,122 cases with 46,233 recovered and 411 deaths [15]. Health workers are at the front line of the COVID-19 outbreak response and as such are exposed to hazards that put them at risk of infection [16]. Community health workers are one of the apex part of the health system of Nepal. After the decentralization, local government health system purely depends on community health workers. They are the pioneer for the prevention, promotion, and curative activities at the community level. So, their knowledge and attitude play a pivotal role for preventing COVID-19 at the community level and this study aims to find out the knowledge and attitude on prevention of novel coronavirus among community health workers in Nepal.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study design was carried out to find out the status of knowledge and attitude of community health care workers towards the prevention of novel corona virus-2019. The study was conducted among the community health workers who are working at Health post and Primary Health Care level health institutions during the pandemic of COVID-19 in all the seven provinces of Nepal. A semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire was prepared in google form and circulated to the sampled health workers of all 7 provinces. The online forms were disseminated via various social media platforms like Facebook, messenger, Instagram, g-mails, Whatsaap and Viber. The informed consent was also attached along with the Google forms before the beginning of the survey. Informed consent was taken from each respondent before the data collection and they were provided full rights to withdraw the study at any instance of time they wish. Also, ethical approval was taken from NHRC (ERB (Ethical Review Board) protocol registration number: 360/2020 P) prior to the conduction of study. A total of 650 invitation were send and among them 420 responded and among them only 399 provided complete response. The sample size was calculated using the formula for the descriptive cross-sectional study, i.e. N = (Z α/2) 2 p*q / d2) where, Z α/2= Z-normal score corresponding to 95% CI i.e. 1.96p = prevalence of knowledge on COVID-19 = 75%, q = 1-p and d = allowable error = 4%. The sample size N = {(1.96) ^2 *0.75* 0.25/ (0.04)^2} = 450.The sampling of the respondents was carried out via convenience sampling technique (non-probability sampling method). For maintaining quality control and quality assurance of this study, designed questionnaires was pre-tested for content validity and tools were modified after pre-test and from observation field note. After the distribution of the questionnaire, 420 responses were obtained from the health care workers out of which 399 met the inclusion criteria which was 95% of the total response and 88% of the total sample size. After the data collection, it was checked for completeness. The information will automatically be transferred to excel sheet and then transferred to SPSS. Responses containing anonymized data was collected and analyzed using SPSS-version 20. The results were interpreted in terms of percentage response, knowledge and attitude score and chi-square test and logistic regression was adopted to find the association between knowledge and attitude with various demographic and enabling factors.

Results

Out the total sample size of 450, we took 399 responses taking into consideration all the inclusion criteria. Responses from health workers other than HP, PHC of Government of Nepal, not residing in Nepal, not working at the time of COVID-19 pandemic, were excluded. So, from 399 valid response, 230 (47.6%) were males and 169 (42.4%) were females. So, the gender of the participants was almost evenly distributed. Regarding the marital status of the respondents, more than half of them were married (61.7%) followed by unmarried (37.6%). Among the total respondents participated, nearly 1/3rd was HA (Health Assistant) (29.6%) and the least were ANM and staff nurses, both 4.8%. Majority of the respondent (61.2%) said that Television and radio was the media through which they firstly got the information about COVID-19. Nearly 2/5 (40.1%) of the respondents were working at Bagmati province while the least (3%) respondents were from Sudurpaschim province. Regarding the education level, 41.4% of the respondents had completed PCL (Proficiency Certificate level) and only 11.3% had completed their master level study. Nearly half (46.1%) of the respondents responded that their monthly income was between 25 k–35 k which was the average scale of government employee of Nepal of 5/6th level. The information is showed in Table 1.
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (n = 399)

VariablesCategoryFrequencyPercentage
Age18–2717744.4
28–3713734.3
38–476315.8
48 and above225.5
399100.0
GenderMale23057.6
Female16942.4
399100
Marital statusMarried24661.7
Unmarried15037.6
Divorced10.3
Widow20.5
100
DesignationHA11829.6
AHW8721.8
ANM9724.3
Nursing staff194.8
PHO194.8
Others5914.8
399100
Firstly, known Information about COVID-19Socialmedias (FB/Twitter/ YouTube/ Instagram)13734.3
Television/ radio24461.2
Friends and relatives71.8
scientific journals112.8
399100
Working provinceProvince 212330.8
Bagmati16040.1
Gandaki61.5
Karnali9824.6
Sudurpaschim123.0
399100
Education levelMaster4511.3
Bachelor10225.6
PCL16541.4
TSLC8721.8
399100
Monthly income25 K–35 K18446.1
35 K–45 K9223.1
45 K–55 K6215.5
Above 55 K6115.3
399100
Orientation on COVID-19Yes8220.6
No31779.4
399100
Extra allowance providedYes9423.6
No30576.4
399100
Working hours in a week<=4011929.8
> 4028070.2
399100
Support from palikaExcellent174.3
Good25162.9
Poor7919.8
very Poor5213.0
399100
Palika level COVID-19 Response teamYes28170.4
No235.8
Don’t know9523.8
399100
Socio-demographic characteristics of participants (n = 399) Table 1: Frequency regarding the various enabling factors had different responses. It was found from the study that very minimum (20.6%) employee has received orientation on COVID-19 and also very few staffs (23.6%) received extra allowance during the situation of COVID-19 and the rest did not get any allowance which might demotivated them in their performance. Regarding the working hours of health staffs, more than 2/3 (70.2%) said that they had been working for more than 40 h in a week due to the situation of COVID-19. Support from respective palikas was found good (62.9%) which might have motivate them to work efficiently; maximum respondents (70.4%) said that they had “palika level COVID-19 response team” for the surveillance of situation of COVID-19. In the knowledge related section shown in Table 2, almost all, 99.5% (397) participants said that COVID-19 is caused by virus and maximum, 98.5% (393) responded that COVID-19 is transmitted by close contact with infected people. Regarding the knowledge about the first case of novel corona virus identified place, it was found that majority of the participants, 90.2% (360) know that it was found firstly in Wuhan, China. Furthermore, regarding the knowledge about symptoms of COVID-19, 87.2% (348) said that fever, cough, shortness of breath was the symptoms of corona virus. Regarding the isolation period of COVID-19, majority of the participants, 70.7% (282) were well known about it and 82.2% (328) had right knowledge about prevention from COVID-19. Remarkably, all 100% of the respondents were well known about the fact that antibiotic was not the first line treatment of COVID-19. A total of 88.3% (352) participants correctly said that PPE includes gloves, apron, face mask and eye protection.
Table 2

Frequency related to knowledge of participants

VariablesCategoryFrequencyPercentage
COVID-19 is caused byVirus39799.5
Fungus10.3
Parasite10.3
399100
COVID-19 is transmitted by close contact with infected person?Yes39398.5
No61.5
399100
The first case of novel coronavirus was identified inBeijing174.3
Shanghai225.5
Wuhan, Hubei36090.2
399100
Which is true about COVID-19?All age group8721.8
Mild in children92.3
Older and pre-existing medical condition9423.6
All of the above20952.4
399100
Symptoms of COVID-19 are:Fever71.8
Cough30.8
Shortness of breadth4110.3
All the above34887.2
399100
The COVID-19 virus spreads via respiratory droplets of infected individualsYes39599
No41
399100
The isolation period for COVID-19 is:1 week30.8
2 weeks28270.7
3 weeks7418.5
More than 4 weeks4010
399100
How to prevent from COVID19?Clean hands with soap and water/ sanitizer5714.3
Cover mouth and nose when coughing and sneezing61.5
Avoid close contact with those who show signs of flu51.3
Properly cook meats, eggs before eating30.8
All the above32882.2
399100
COVID-19 vaccines are available in the market nowYes5413.5
No34586.5
399100
Health care workers are at high risk of COVID-19Yes38997.5
No102.5
399100
PPE includes:Gloves164
Gloves, apron205
Gloves, apron, face mask112.7
Gloves, apron, face mask and eye protection35288.3
399100
Frequency related to knowledge of participants Regarding the attitude of the respondents, 56% (224) had the feeling that they will get infected with COVID-19 at some time of the pandemic period, 92% (367) accepted that they will be in isolation in health facility if they are infected with COVID-19. Only 11.5% (46) participants refuse to take the vaccine if it was available in the market. Furthermore, 95.2% (380) employed participants thought that wearing PPE will reduce the chances of getting COVID-19. Also, regarding the COVID − 19 prevention, 92.5% (369) participants thought that lockdown was the best way. Regarding the attitude and perception towards the control of COVID-19, majority of the participants 80.5% (321) responded that COVID-19 will successfully be controlled followed by 19% (78) who thought that it won’t be controlled at the earliest. This is illustrated in Table 3.
Table 3

Frequency related to attitude variables of participants

VariablesCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
Do you think you will get ill from COVID-19Yes22456.1
No17543.9
399100
If you get COVID-19, will you accept isolation in a Health facility?Yes36792
No328
399100
If COVID-19 vaccine were available, would you t take it?Yes35388.5
No4611.5
399100
Do you think wearing PPE reduces the chance of getting COVID-19?Yes38095.2
No194.8
399100
Do you think lockdown is the best way to prevent COVID-19?Yes36992.5
No307.5
399100
Do you feel bad when people don’t use masks while coming for treatment?Yes36792
No328
399100
Do you think COVID-19 will successfully be controlled?Yes32180.5
No7819.5
399100
Frequency related to attitude variables of participants In bivariate analysis (chi-square test) Table 4, it was found that gender was significantly associated with knowledge level as male tend to have more knowledge level (P < 0.002). Also, marital status was found to be significantly associated with the knowledge scores, for married knowledge level found to be high (P = 0.008) compared to the other categories. It was also found that participants working at Bagmati province had high level of knowledge (P < 0.001). Participants who were designated as “HA” and education level- PLC complete was significantly associated with the knowledge level. Similarly, people with monthly income 25 k–35 k was found to have more knowledge level (P < 0.005) and also the significant association with knowledge level was found with the enabling factor “support from palika” (P < 0.045). Staffs receiving excellent support from palika had high knowledge level.
Table 4

Association of Knowledge with demographic and enabling factors

VariablesCategoriesKnowledgeP-value
HighLow
Age18–27113640.924
28–378849
38–472825
48 and above139
GenderMale160700.002
Female9277
Marital statusMarried1421040.008
Unmarried10842
Divorced10
Widow11
DesignationHA8137< 0.001
AHW5631
ANM4156
Nursing staff172
PHO163
Others4118
Firstly, known Information about COVID-19Social medias (FB/Twitter/ youtube/ instagram)10136< 0.001
Television/ radio134110
Friends and relatives61
scientific journals110
working provinceProvince 28637< 0.001
Bagmati11149
Gandaki51
Karnali4553
Sudurpaschim57
Education levelMaster2916< 0.001
Bachelor6834
PCL12144
TSLC3453
Monthly income25 K–35 K118660.005
35 K–45 K4547
45 K–55 K4418
Above 55 K4516
Orientation on COVID-19Yes50320.646
No202115
Working hours in a week<=4074450.793
> 40178102
Extra allowance providedYes57370.562
No195110
Support from palikaExcellent1070.045
Good15398
Poor6019
very Poor2923
Sufficient equipment and medicines available at health facilitiesYes1311210.259
No8562
Palika level COVID-19 Response teamYes1791020.879
No158
Don’t know5837
Association of Knowledge with demographic and enabling factors On the other hand, gender, marital status, working province and presence/ absence of palika level COVID-19 response team had significant association with the attitude score. Male participants (P < 0.001), HA (P < 0.001), staffs working at Bagmati province (P < 0.01) and participants working in palika having “palika level COVID-19 response team” (P < 0.001) was found to have positive attitude toward the prevention of COVID-19 compared to others Table 5.
Table 5

Association with Attitude and demographic/ enabling factors

VariablesCategoriesAttitudeP-value
PositiveNegative
Age18–27123540.26
28–378453
38–473924
48 and above135
GenderMale16763< 0.001
Female9673
Marital statusMarried154920.12
Unmarried10842
Divorced01
Widow11
DesignationHA9028< 0.001
AHW5631
ANM4948
Nursing staff118
PHO163
Others4118
Firstly, known Information about COVID-19Social medias (FB/Twitter/ YouTube/ Instagram)104330.002
Television/ radio144100
Friends and relatives61
scientific journals92
working provinceProvince 286370.01
Bagmati11446
Gandaki51
Karnali5048
Sudurpaschim84
Education levelMaster31140.09
Bachelor6735
PCL11748
TSLC4839
Monthly income25 K–35 K128560.184
35 K–45 K5240
45 K–55 K4220
Above 55 K4120
Orientation on COVID-19Yes54280.99
No209108
Working hours in a week<=4082370.411
> 4018199
Extra allowance providedYes60340.626
No203102
Support from palikaExcellent1160.309
Good16487
Poor5821
very Poor3022
Sufficient equipment and medicines available at health facilitiesYes123600.615
No14076
Palika level COVID-19 Response teamYes191900.001
No212
Don’t know5144
Association with Attitude and demographic/ enabling factors

Stepwise logistic regression

We performed forward stepwise logistic regression to identify whether the demographic and enabling factors had significant association with knowledge and attitude status of the participants. In Table 6, the logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds of knowledge level was 2 times higher (AOR = 1.913 at 95% CI: 1.266–2.891) compared to the female participants. Knowledge level was significantly associated with the designation of the respondents as nursing staffs had 2 folds more knowledge (AOR = 2.243, 95% CI = 1.006–5.00) compared to those of the HA (Ref-HA). Similarly, the variables education level and monthly income of the participants were also found to have statistically significant relationship with the knowledge level.
Table 6

Effect of socio-demographic and enabling factors on Knowledge and attitude (logistic regression model)

VariablesCategoriesAdjusted Odds ratio (AOR)95% CIP-value
GenderMale1.9131.266–2.8910.002
FemaleRef
DesignationHARef
AHW1.2130.563–2.6130.622
ANM0.9910.450–2.1810.982
Nursing staff2.2431.006–5.0000.048
PHO0.2790.055–1.4290.126
Others0.3860.092–1.6200.193
Education levelMasterRef
Bachelor0.4650.228–0.9500.036
PCL0.7780.311–1.9490.592
TSLC0.3050.161–0.579< 0.001
Monthly income25 K–35 KRef
35 K–45 K1.3380.647–2.7660.431
45 K–55 K2.5231.157–5.5000.020
Above 55 K0.9790.415–2.3120.962
VariableCategoriesAdjusted Odds ratio (AOR)95% CIp-value
GenderMale1.8841.216–2.9180.005
FemaleRef
Firstly, known Information about COVID-19Social medias (FB/Twitter/ YouTube/ Instagram)Ref
Television/ radio0.3010.035–2.5800.273
Friends and relatives0.3670.076–1.7680.211
scientific journals0.4750.293–0.7680.002
Palika level COVID-19 Response teamYesRef
No1.4510.882–2.3860.142
Do not know0.1950.044–0.8630.031
Effect of socio-demographic and enabling factors on Knowledge and attitude (logistic regression model) Furthermore, attitude status of the respondents was also found to have significant association with the variables like gender, firstly known information about COVID-19 and presence/ absence of palika level COVID-19 response team. Here, it was found that male tend to have positive attitude which is 2 times more (AOR: 1.884, 95% CI: 1.216–2.918) compared to those of the females (ref-female). The other two variable are shown in the Table 6.

Discussion

The study investigated the knowledge and attitude of community health care providers who were working during the time of COVID-19 pandemic at health facilities of Nepal. The result showed that gender, marital status, designation, information about COVID-19, working province, education level, monthly income, support from palika were found statistically significant with knowledge level and attitude status was associated with gender, designation, information about COVID-19, working province and palika level COVID-19 response team. HCWs are the frontline workers in the management of suspected and potential cases of the COVID-19. Their knowledge and attitude will likely have an important bearing on the course and containment of the pandemic. Our findings revealed that most of the participants (63.2%) were knowledgeable about the prevention of COVID-19. The finding is consistent with other studies done at china, Indian and Saudi Arabia [17-20]. The high level of knowledge might be due to the information network of the current modern world and higher education level of the people. On the other hand, the attitude was also found positive among more than 2/3rd (65.9%) of the participants which was also correlated with various studies conducted at China India, Vietnam and Saudi Arabia [17-20]. The gender of the respondents was much evenly distributed as 47.6% male and 42.4% females which we considered a good gender response rate. Nearly half (46.1%) of the respondents responded that their monthly income was between 25 k–35 k which was the average scale of government employee of Nepal of 5/6th level and our almost respondents fall on this category. Regarding the enabling factors, it was found that very less (20.6%) participants had received orientation on COVID-19 but maximum (70.4%) said that they had palika level COVID-19 response team for the surveillance of the situation of COVID-19. Regarding the knowledge level, nearly all the participants (98.5%) know that COVID-19 is transmitted by close contact with the infected people and 90% were correct regarding the place of outbreak of Corona virus i.e. Wuhan, China. Furthermore, regarding the knowledge about symptoms of COVID-19, 87.2% (348) said that fever, cough, shortness of breath was the symptoms of corona virus which was a very good response rate. The high rate might be because of the field and area they were working i.e. medical field. Regarding the isolation period of COVID-19, majority of the participants, 70.7% (282) were well known about it and 82.2% (328) had correct knowledge about prevention from COVID-19. This finding was consistent with a recent study done in Nepal [21]. Remarkably, all 100% of the respondents were well known about the fact that antibiotic was not the first line treatment of COVID-19. Concerning the attitude of the respondents, more than half of the respondents (56%) had the feeling that they will be infected with Corona virus at some point of time of the pandemic. The positive point is that majority of the respondents (92%) accepted that they will stay at isolation if they get infected with corona virus. This is a very positive attitude of the respondents and especially the health workers. On the other hand, still 8% did not accept it, which is likely to be related to a lack of knowledge within the HCW’s about current and important prevention and isolation strategies. A study from Taiwan also exhibit a similar result [22]. Majority of the respondents (80.5%) were positive that COVID-19 will successfully be controlled which is a positive attitude toward any health problems. Positive attitudes and high confidence in the control of COVID-19 can be explained by the government’s unprecedented actions and prompt response in taking stringent control and precautionary measures against COVID-19, to safeguard citizens and ensure their well-being. These measures include the lockdown, and the suspension of all domestic and international flights, schools and universities, and the stepwise shutdown and prohibitory orders imposed. In the study it was found that gender was associated with both knowledge level and attitude of the respondents. Male were found to have more knowledge and positive attitude toward the prevention of COVID-19 (p < 0.002). This was contrary to the finding of the study conducted at India and China [23, 24]. The reason for male to be more in this category might be that in Nepal, still male get higher chance to get exposed in various field and orientation programs. Females are not highly entertained in the training and seminars conducted because of the thinking that they have had the responsibilities at their home and couldn’t contribute fully for the programs. Television and radio were significantly associated with the knowledge and attitude of the respondents as higher level of knowledge was associated with those who get information via TV and radio. This might bedue to the reason that TV and radio are the reliable Medias [25] and only broadcast the information based on evidences despite some of the social medias like Facebook, You-tube, Instagrametc [26, 27]. Also, education level (< 0.001), working province (p < 0.001) and monthly income (p < 0.005) are some of the demographic characteristics which have association with the knowledge level and regarding the enabling factors only “support from palika” is found to be associated with the knowledge level (p < 0.045). Since this, study assessed only limited demographic variables, it is recommended that we include more demographic as well as socio-cultural variables in further studies. This study also highlighted the area of some enabling factors which might be responsible for the knowledge and attitude of the HCW’s. Most of the respondents (79.4%) had not received any orientation regarding COVID-19. This might have serious impact on the knowledge level of the HCW’s [17, 28]. Another finding of this study revealed that 70% of the respondents work for more than 40 h in a week and nearly 3/5th (76.4%) is not paid extra allowance during their extra hours of services. So, this will really demotivate the HCW’s toward their dedicated services. This issue should be addressed by the concerned authority as soon as possible. Many of the palikas, HCW’s work have a palika level COVID-19 response team (70.4%) followed by 5.8% not having and 23.8% were not aware of it. HCW’s not being aware of the palika level COVID-19 response team clarifies that some of them are still not serious and concerned about their roles and responsibilities. Nevertheless, the study findings revealed that the knowledge and attitude of the respondents/ HCW’s working at various health facilities at different provinces of Nepal was found to be good despite some had low level of knowledge and negative attitude toward the prevention of COVID-19. The logistic regression (forward stepwise) also revealed several factors being associated with the knowledge and attitude of the HCW’s. Among then some were found matching with various studies conducted at national/ international level [17, 28–30] whereas some were found to contradict with the various study findings [21-24]. Our study also has some notable limitations. First, as those who had no internet access could not take part in the survey as the questionnaire were circulated through google forms. Also, the study could not take many variables of prime focus into consideration due to shorten the length of the questionnaire as it was self-administered and online based. Furthermore, since the attitudes are based on the healthcare workers’ knowledge and availability of specialized logistics like PPE for maintaining the appropriate biosafety along with their perception of the healthcare system, their understanding of institutional preparedness are solely based on their own observation and perception. Finally, the study aims to explore the ground reality of the knowledge and attitude of HCW’s toward the prevention from COVID-19 in Nepal. This is an utmost need in the context of this pandemic to diminish the situation from worsening further. This study will eventually bridge the gap between the current situation of COVID-19 of the HCW’s and the policy makers at the local, province and federal level of Government of Nepal. There is a need to educate and orient the HCW’s regarding COVID-19 via different method and medias appropriate at the current situation of pandemic to upgrade the knowledge level of the HCW’s and also building the HCW’s confidence on existing health system regarding appropriate and timely containment of the pandemic so improving the trust and reliability between government policy makers and the HCW’s is of paramount importance. The results showed that healthcare workers report good knowledge and practices related to COVID-19. However, they lack optimistic attitudes and confidence. The findings also demonstrated that healthcare professionals seeking formation from unverified sources such as social media and co-workers. These results are impactful and should be addressed through standardized training opportunities and distribution of official sources about COVID-19 to health care professionals to deliver optimal care to COVID patients and to minimize the risk of transmission of infection among health workers. Constantly updated refresher training from authentic sources will contribute to better performance.

Conclusion

Proper and adequate knowledge and attitude towards COVID-19 is a paramount in the prevention and control of SARS-COV2 and it is utmost important to the frontline health workers who are daily exposed to the risk of virus. Knowing the causes and transmission sources of a disease, increases the likelihood that people will become more aware of the spread of communicable diseases, and of the preventive measures to slow the transmission. Although most of the study participants possess a good knowledge and positive attitude toward the prevention of COVID-19, still there is a need to orient more HCW’s regarding COVID-19preventive measures. These results are impactful and should be addressed through standardized training opportunities and distribution of official sources about COVID-19 to healthcare professionals to deliver optimal care to COVID patients and to minimize the risk of transmission of infection among health workers. Constantly updated refresher training from authentic sources will contribute to better performance. Additional file 1: Questionnaires. Additional file 2: COVID-19 database SPSS.
  16 in total

1.  Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Prevalent fears and inadequate understanding of COVID-19 among medical undergraduates in India: results of a web-based survey.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Vishwesh Agarwal; Latika Gupta; Samira Davalbhakta; Vikas Agarwal; Ashish Goel
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Edinb       Date:  2020-09

3.  CASCIRE surveillance network and work on avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Yuhai Bi; Weifeng Shi; Jianjun Chen; Quanjiao Chen; Zhenghai Ma; Gary Wong; Wenxia Tian; Renfu Yin; Guanghua Fu; Yongchun Yang; William J Liu; Chuansong Quan; Qianli Wang; Shenghu He; Xiangdong Li; Qianfeng Xia; Lixin Wang; Zhaohui Pan; Laixing Li; Hong Li; Wen Xu; Ying Luo; Hui Zeng; Lianpan Dai; Haixia Xiao; Kirill Sharshov; Alexander Shestopalov; Yi Shi; Jinghua Yan; Xuebing Li; Yingxia Liu; Fumin Lei; Wenjun Liu; George F Gao
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.038

4.  Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Ali M Zaki; Sander van Boheemen; Theo M Bestebroer; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Ron A M Fouchier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.

Authors:  Chaolin Huang; Yeming Wang; Xingwang Li; Lili Ren; Jianping Zhao; Yi Hu; Li Zhang; Guohui Fan; Jiuyang Xu; Xiaoying Gu; Zhenshun Cheng; Ting Yu; Jiaan Xia; Yuan Wei; Wenjuan Wu; Xuelei Xie; Wen Yin; Hui Li; Min Liu; Yan Xiao; Hong Gao; Li Guo; Jungang Xie; Guangfa Wang; Rongmeng Jiang; Zhancheng Gao; Qi Jin; Jianwei Wang; Bin Cao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward COVID-19 Among the Public in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mohammed K Al-Hanawi; Khadijah Angawi; Noor Alshareef; Ameerah M N Qattan; Hoda Z Helmy; Yasmin Abudawood; Mohammed Alqurashi; Waleed M Kattan; Nasser Akeil Kadasah; Gowokani Chijere Chirwa; Omar Alsharqi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-05-27

8.  A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster.

Authors:  Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Shuofeng Yuan; Kin-Hang Kok; Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Hin Chu; Jin Yang; Fanfan Xing; Jieling Liu; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Hoi-Wah Tsoi; Simon Kam-Fai Lo; Kwok-Hung Chan; Vincent Kwok-Man Poon; Wan-Mui Chan; Jonathan Daniel Ip; Jian-Piao Cai; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Honglin Chen; Christopher Kim-Ming Hui; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): knowledge, attitudes, practices and sources of information among physicians answering a SARS fever hotline service.

Authors:  J-F Deng; B Olowokure; S C Kaydos-Daniels; H-J Chang; R S Barwick; M-L Lee; C-Y Deng; S H Factor; C-E Chiang; S A Maloney
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Is the Saudi public aware of Middle East respiratory syndrome?

Authors:  Omar A Al-Mohrej; Sarah D Al-Shirian; Salman K Al-Otaibi; Hani M Tamim; Emad M Masuadi; Hana M Fakhoury
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2015-11-15       Impact factor: 3.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.