Isabel Johanna Walter1, Mirthe Jasmijn Klein Haneveld1, Anne Titia Lely1, Katharina Wilhelmina Maria Bloemenkamp1, Maarten Limper2, Judith Kooiman3. 1. University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands. 2. University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.kooiman@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess the magnitude of effect of pregnancy outcome predictors in women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by means of systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched (13th June 2020) for studies reporting on pre-pregnancy risk factors of pregnancy outcomes in APS patients. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently, in a blinded standardized manner. Pooled univariate odds ratios (OR) were computed using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2%. RESULTS: The search yielded 3013 unique results; 27 records were included in this meta-analysis. Previous thrombosis was associated with a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.60, p < 0.01, I2 = 40%), increased neonatal mortality (OR 15.19, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), an increased risk of antenatal or postpartum thrombosis (OR 6.26, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and an increased risk of delivering a small for gestational age neonate (SGA) (OR 2.60, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Patients with an APS laboratory category I (double or triple positivity) profile had a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.66, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), an increased risk of SGA (OR 1.86, p = 0.01, I2 = 43%) and preterm birth (OR 1.35, p < 0.01, I2 = 49%). Triple positivity was associated with a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.33, p < 0.01, I2 = 68%), an increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 2.43, p = 0.02, I2 = 35%) and SGA (OR 2.47, p = 0.04, I2 = 61%). Patients with lupus anticoagulant positivity had an increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 2.10, p = 0.02, I2 = 48%), SGA (OR 1.78, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and preterm birth (OR 3.56, p = 0.01, I2 = 48%). Risk of bias assessment suggested considerable bias on study participation and statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis identified previous thrombosis, laboratory category I, triple positivity and lupus anticoagulant positivity as the most important predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This up-to-date knowledge, can be used in preconception counseling and tailoring of obstetric care.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and assess the magnitude of effect of pregnancy outcome predictors in women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by means of systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched (13th June 2020) for studies reporting on pre-pregnancy risk factors of pregnancy outcomes in APSpatients. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently, in a blinded standardized manner. Pooled univariate odds ratios (OR) were computed using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2%. RESULTS: The search yielded 3013 unique results; 27 records were included in this meta-analysis. Previous thrombosis was associated with a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.60, p < 0.01, I2 = 40%), increased neonatal mortality (OR 15.19, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), an increased risk of antenatal or postpartum thrombosis (OR 6.26, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and an increased risk of delivering a small for gestational age neonate (SGA) (OR 2.60, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Patients with an APS laboratory category I (double or triple positivity) profile had a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.66, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%), an increased risk of SGA (OR 1.86, p = 0.01, I2 = 43%) and preterm birth (OR 1.35, p < 0.01, I2 = 49%). Triple positivity was associated with a decreased live birth risk (OR 0.33, p < 0.01, I2 = 68%), an increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 2.43, p = 0.02, I2 = 35%) and SGA (OR 2.47, p = 0.04, I2 = 61%). Patients with lupus anticoagulant positivity had an increased risk of preeclampsia (OR 2.10, p = 0.02, I2 = 48%), SGA (OR 1.78, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%) and preterm birth (OR 3.56, p = 0.01, I2 = 48%). Risk of bias assessment suggested considerable bias on study participation and statistical methods. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis identified previous thrombosis, laboratory category I, triple positivity and lupus anticoagulant positivity as the most important predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes. This up-to-date knowledge, can be used in preconception counseling and tailoring of obstetric care.