Literature DB >> 34280482

Optimal number of baseline sessions before changing phases within single-case experimental designs.

Lucy Barnard-Brak1, Laci Watkins2, David Richman3.   

Abstract

Recommendations vary considerably for the minimum or optimal number of baseline sessions to conduct within single-case experimental design clinical analyses or research studies. We examined the optimal number of baseline sessions that produced minimal bias. First, we examined the relation between the number of baseline sessions and the degree of bias in calculating estimates of treatment effect size. As the number of baseline sessions increased, the bias in effect size estimates decreased, r = -0.36, p < 0.001. s, we examined what would be the minimum number of baseline sessions associated with varying levels of bias. Bias of approximately ten percent was associated with four to five baseline sessions. Bias of about five percent was associated with six to seven baseline sessions. Third, we examined the relation between standard deviation and varying levels of bias. As the number of baseline sessions increases, the standard deviation for the phase decreased, r = -0.89, p < 0.001. Fourth, we examined what value of standard deviation in the baseline phase was associated with equal to or more than five versus ten percent bias. When considering five or ten percent bias, the optimal level of standard deviation was 0.59 or less.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Baseline; Sessions; Single case; Single subject

Year:  2021        PMID: 34280482     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  1 in total

1.  Waiting for baseline stability in single-case designs: Is it worth the time and effort?

Authors:  Marc J Lanovaz; Rachel Primiani
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.