Literature DB >> 34279850

Infigratinib: First Approval.

Connie Kang1.   

Abstract

Infigratinib (TRUSELTIQTM), a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being co-developed by QED Therapeutics and Helsinn for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and other FGFR-driven conditions. Infigratinib was recently approved in the USA for the treatment of previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement as detected by a test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of infigratinib leading to this first approval for advanced cholangiocarcinoma.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34279850      PMCID: PMC8610935          DOI: 10.1007/s40265-021-01567-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


Infigratinib (TRUSELTIQTM): Key points

Introduction

Infigratinib (TRUSELTIQTM) is a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor being co-developed by QED Therapeutics and Helsinn for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma [1]. FGFRs play a role in cell proliferation, differentiation and angiogenesis [2]. Infigratinib received its first approval on 28 May 2021 in the USA for the treatment of previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement as detected by a test approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [2, 3]. The recommended dosage of infigratinib is 125 mg orally once daily for 21 consecutive days in a 28-day cycle, continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity [2]. Treatment with infigratinib may cause retinal pigment epithelial detachment (RPED), hyperphosphatemia, soft tissue mineralization and embryo-foetal toxicity [2]. Infigratinib is also being developed in urothelial carcinoma (currently enrolling a phase III trial) and, at much lower doses, achondroplasia (at phase II) [1]. Development of infigratinib in haematological malignancies, malignant melanoma, solid tumours and other cancers (head and neck, squamous cell, colon, pancreatic and rectal) are not ongoing. Key milestones in the development of infigratinib. CCA cholangiocarcinoma, NDA New Drug Application

Company Agreements

The intellectual property rights to infigratinib for the treatment of FGFR-mediated diseases were licensed from Novartis Oncology to BridgeBio Pharma in January 2018 [4]. BridgeBio Pharma is developing the drug with its subsidiary, QED Therapeutics [4]. In September 2019, a collaboration agreement was signed between the Ivy Brain Tumor Center and QED Therapeutics to investigate infigratinib for the treatment of glioblastoma, with particular focus on FGFR genetic alterations [5]. LianBio and BridgeBio Pharma entered into an agreement in August 2020 to develop and commercialise infigratinib and BBP 398 in China and other Asian territories [6]. LianBio will have commercial rights in most of these markets and preferential access to many of BridgeBio’s development candidates in the future [6]. In March 2021, QED Therapeutics entered into a global collaboration and licensing agreement with Helsinn for the development and commercialisation of infigratinib in all indications except skeletal dysplasia [7]. Under the terms of the agreement, all rights to infigratinib in skeletal dysplasia (including achondroplasia) will be retained by BridgeBio Pharma. Helsinn and BridgeBio will co-commercialise infigratinib in oncology indications in the USA, and Helsinn will have exclusive commercialisation rights outside the USA (excluding China, Hong Kong and Macau, which are covered by the agreement with LianBio) [7]. Chemical structure of infigratinib

Scientific Summary

Pharmacodynamics

FGFR activity can lead to the proliferation of malignant cancer cell lines with activating FGFR amplifications, fusions or mutations [2]. Infigratinib selectively binds to and inhibits FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and FGFR4 (IC50 1.1 nM, 1 nM, 2 nM and 61 nM, respectively). This inhibition of FGFR leads to reduced cell proliferation in tumours with these FGFR mutations or rearrangements. The binding affinities for the major metabolites, BHS697 and CQM157, are similar to that of infigratinib. Infigratinib demonstrated anti-tumour activity in xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma with activating FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations [2]. The FGFR inhibitory effect of infigratinib can also lead to increased serum phosphate levels at the approved dosage; the risk of hyperphosphataemia is higher with increased doses [8]. Infigratinib dose adjustments (reduction, temporary or permanent discontinuation) may be required [2]. Anti-tumour activity has been seen in a phase I trial of infigratinib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma with FGFR3 mutations [9], leading to an expanded phase I trial in this cohort [10]. Hyperphosphataemia was associated with increasing infigratinib exposure and enhanced efficacy in these patients [11]. Animal model data also suggest the potential of infigratinib (at much lower doses) in treating children with achondroplasia [12].

Pharmacokinetics

Following administration with the approved dosage of infigratinib in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the mean steady-state maximum drug concentration (Cmax) and area under the time-concentration curve from time zero to 24 h (AUC0−24) were 282.5 ng/mL and 3780 ng·h/mL, respectively [2]. Cmax and AUC0−24 increased more than dose proportionally over a dose range of 5–150 mg, with a mean accumulation ratio of 8- and 5-fold, respectively. In healthy subjects, mean Cmax and AUCinfinity were both increased following administration of infigratinib with a high-fat and high-calorie meal (by 60–80% and 80–120%, respectively). However, coadministration of infigratinib with a low-calorie meal only increased the mean AUCinfinity by 70% [2]. Steady state was reached within 15 days in patients with cholangiocarcinoma who were administered infigratinib [2]. At steady state, the median time to reach Cmax (tmax) was 6 h, with a mean apparent volume of distribution of 1600 L. Infigratinib binds dose-dependently to protein (mean 96.8%), mainly to lipoprotein. The geometric mean total apparent clearance was 33.1 L/h and terminal half-life was 33.5 h [2]. In vitro infigratinib metabolism was predominantly CYP3A4-mediated (94%) [2]. The two major metabolites (both > 10% of dose) BHS697 and CQM157 accounted for ≈ 16–33% and ≈ 9–12%, respectively, of the overall pharmacological activity of infigratinib. In plasma, 38% of the infigratinib dose was unchanged infigratinib [2]. In healthy subjects, a single dose of radiolabeled infigratinib resulted in ≈ 77% excretion in faeces and 7.2% in urine (3.4% and 1.9% as unchanged infigratinib) [13]. The relative potency adjusted steady-state AUC for infigratinib (and its metabolites) were increased in patients with abnormal kidney or liver function, therefore the infigratinib dosage should be reduced in patients with mild to moderate kidney or liver dysfunction [2]. In vitro studies show infigratinib did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9 or CYP3A4; infigratinib and its metabolites did not inhibit major CYP450 enzymes. Infigratinib inhibited MATE1 and BCRP, and is a substrate for P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and BCRP. At clinically relevant concentrations, infigratinib and its metabolites have a low potential to inhibit OATP1B1, OATP1B3, P-gp or BCRP [2].

Therapeutic Trials

The first approval of infigratinib for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma was granted following the results from a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (NCT02150967) [2]. Patients with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with an FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement received oral infigratinib at the approved dosage [2]. In a primary analysis (data cutoff 30 June 2016) of 61 patients [48 patients (78.7%) had FGFR2 fusions], the primary endpoint of overall response rate, as assessed by local site radiographic review, was achieved by 14.8% of patients [14]. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated at 5.8 months (95% CI 4.3–7.6 months) and the disease control rate was 75.4% (95% CI 62.7–85.5%) [14]. At a median follow-up of 10.6 months (data cutoff 31 March 2020), treatment with infigratinib in 108 patients (81% had in-frame FGFR2 fusions, 19% had other FGFR2 rearrangements) resulted in an overall objective response rate (as assessed by blinded independent central review) of 23.1% (95% CI 15.6–32.2%; primary endpoint) [2], and 34.0% and 13.8%, respectively, in patients with ≤ 1 or ≥ 2 prior lines of treatment [15]. The median duration of response was 5.0 months (range 3.7–9.3 months) [2]. One patient (0.9%) has achieved complete response, with partial response in 22% of patients. Duration of response exceeding 6 months has been observed in 32.0% of patients [2]. The disease control rate (composite endpoint of complete and partial response) was 84.3% (95% CI 76.0-90.6%) [15]. The efficacy of oral infigratinib (125 mg/day for 21 days per 28-day cycle) was also evaluated in a prospective, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial in patients with previously treated, advanced urothelial carcinoma with FGFR3 alterations (n = 67) [10]. At primary analysis (data cutoff 30 January 2017), the primary endpoint of overall response rate (included complete and partial responses) was 25.4% of patients. In these patients, the median duration of response was an estimated 5.1 months (95% CI 3.9–7.4 months). Disease control (a composite endpoint of complete response, partial response and stable disease) was observed in 64.2% of patients. Estimated median PFS and median overall survival were 3.8 months (95% CI 3.1–5.4 months) and 7.8 months (95% CI 5.7–11.6 months), respectively [10].

Adverse Events

The tolerability of infigratinib, when administered at the approved dosage, was analysed in a pooled safety population (n = 351) of patients with cholangiocarcinoma (from study NCT02150967) and patients with other advanced solid tumours or haematological malignancies [2]. Adverse reactions of special interest from this pooled population included RPED, hyperphosphataemia and soft tissue mineralization. RPED was reported in 11% of patients, leading to dose interruption or reduction in 3.4% of patients and permanent discontinuation in 0.6% of patients. Hyperphosphataemia, which can lead to soft tissue mineralization, cutaneous calcinosis and other adverse reactions, was reported in 82% of patients, with a median time to onset of 8 days (range 1–349 days) [2]. Features and properties of infigratinib Increased: creatinine, phosphate, alkaline phosphate, alanine aminotransferase Decreased: phosphate, haemoglobin Key clinical trials of infigratinib In the phase II trial (NCT02150967) in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma treated with infigratinib. adverse reactions with an incidence of ≥ 30% were nail toxicity (57% of patients), stomatitis (56%), dry eye (44%), fatigue (44%), alopaecia (38%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE; 33%), arthralgia (32%), dysgeusia (32%) and constipation (30%) [2]. Grade 3–4 adverse reactions (incidence ≥ 5%) included stomatitis (15%), PPE (7%) and abdominal pain (5%). Laboratory abnormalities that worsened from baseline to grade 3–4 in > 10% of patients included increased urate (37%), decreased phosphate (31%), decreased sodium (20%) and increased phosphate (13%) [2]. Serious adverse reactions were reported in 32% of patients, and included infections, anaemia, pyrexia, abdominal pain, hypercalcaemia and sepsis (all ≥ 2%) [2]. One patient died due to sepsis; this was not considered treatment-related. Permanent discontinuation due to adverse reactions occurred in 15% of patients, most commonly due to increased blood creatinine, fatigue, subretinal fluid and calcinosis. Dosage interruption due to an adverse reaction occurred in 64% of infigratinib recipients and were mostly commonly (≥ 5% of patients) due to hyperphosphataemia, hypercalcaemia, PPE, stomatitis, diarrhea and increased blood creatinine. Dosage reductions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 60% of patients, most frequently (≥ 2% of patients) due to hyperphosphataemia, hypercalcaemia, PPE, stomatitis, increased blood creatinine, increased lipase and onycholysis [2]. In a phase I expansion trial of patients with urothelial carcinoma (n = 67) who received infigratinib, adverse events (AEs) with an incidence > 35% of patients included hyperphosphatemia (46.3%), increased creatinine (41.8%), fatigue (37.3%), constipation (37.3%) and anaemia (35.8%) [10]. The most frequent (incidence ≥ 7.5% of patients) grade 3–4 AEs included hyperlipasaemia (10.4%), fatigue (7.5%), anaemia (7.5%), hypophosphataemia (7.5%), and PPE (7.5%). Grade 3–4 hyperphosphataemia was reported in one patient (1.5%), which was manageable and reversible. At data cutoff, 14.9% of patients had discontinued treatment due to AEs [10].

Companion Diagnostic

The US FDA has approved the FoundationOne® CDx next-generation, sequencing-based in vitro diagnostic device for the detection of FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement in patients with cholangiocarcinoma who may benefit from treatment with infrigatinib [3, 16].

Ongoing Clinical Trials

Infigratinib is being investigated in phase II and III trials in several indications. In addition to the ongoing phase II trial (NCT02150967) in cholangiocarcinoma (on which accelerated approval in the USA was based), the multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled, phase III trial (NCT03773302; PROOF 301) is currently recruiting patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The primary efficacy endpoint is PFS. Another phase II trial (NCT04233567) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours with FGFR mutations is also at the recruitment stage, with a primary endpoint of overall response rate. The ongoing multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial (NCT04197986; PROOF 302) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of infigratinib in patients with urothelial carcinoma; the primary efficacy endpoint is centrally determined disease-free survival. A phase II, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion trial (NCT04265651; PROPEL 2) is recruiting paediatric patients with achondroplasia, with primary endpoints of annualized height velocity and incidence of treatment-emergent AEs.

Current Status

Infigratinib received its first approval on 28 May 2021 in the USA for previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement as detected by an FDA-approved test [3]. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file1 (PDF 699 kb)
Digital Features for this Adis Insight Report can be found at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14870097.
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor is being co-developed by QED Therapeutics and Helsinn for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and other fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-driven conditions.
Received its first approval on 28 May 2021 in the USA.
Approved for use in previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement.

Features and properties of infigratinib

Alternative namesBBP-831; BGJ-398; BGJ-398 phosphate; Infigratinib phosphate; NVP-BGJ398; TRUSELTIQ
ClassAniline compounds, Antineoplastics, Chlorobenzenes, Methylurea compounds, Phenyl ethers, Piperazines, Pyrimidines, Small molecules
Mechanism of actionFibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits tumour angiogenesis and proliferation, leading to tumour cell death
Route of administrationOral
PharmacodynamicsInhibits FGFRs, which are involved in malignant cell proliferation in tumours with FGFR alterations, thereby reducing tumour growth; exhibited anti-tumour activity in xenograft models of cholangiocarcinoma
PharmacokineticsExhibits non-linear pharmacokinetics in patients with cholangiocarcinoma; drug exposure increased following food; tmax 6 h; mainly protein-bound; terminal t1/2 33.5 h; mainly metabolised by CYP3A4
Adverse reactions
Most frequent (> 40%)Nail toxicity, stomatitis, dry eye, fatigue
Laboratory abnormalities (> 50%)

Increased: creatinine, phosphate, alkaline phosphate, alanine aminotransferase

Decreased: phosphate, haemoglobin

Special warnings and precautionsRetinal pigment epithelial detachment, hyperphosphatemia and soft tissue mineralization, embryo-foetal toxicity
ATC codes
WHO ATC codeL01X-E (Protein kinase inhibitors)
EphMRA ATC codeL1H (Protein Kinase Inhibitor Antineoplastics)
Chemical name3-(2,6-dichloro-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[6-[4-(4-ethylpiperazin-1-yl)phenylamino]pyrimidin-4-yl]-1-methylurea phosphate (1:1)

Key clinical trials of infigratinib

IndicationPhaseStatusLocation(s)IdentifierSponsor(s)
CholangiocarcinomaIIIOngoingGlobalNCT03773302, EudraCT2018-004004-19, PROOF 301LianBio, QED Therapeutics
CholangiocarcinomaIIOngoingGlobalNCT02150967, EudraCT2013-005085-19Novartis Pharmaceuticals, QED Therapeutics
Urothelial carcinomaIIIOngoingGlobalNCT04197986, EudraCT2019-003248-63, PROOF 302QED Therapeutics
AchondroplasiaIIOngoingGlobalNCT04265651, EudraCT2019-002954-21, PROPEL 2QED Therapeutics
  5 in total

1.  Phase II Study of BGJ398 in Patients With FGFR-Altered Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Milind Javle; Maeve Lowery; Rachna T Shroff; Karl Heinz Weiss; Christoph Springfeld; Mitesh J Borad; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Lipika Goyal; Saeed Sadeghi; Teresa Macarulla; Anthony El-Khoueiry; Robin Kate Kelley; Ivan Borbath; Su Pin Choo; Do-Youn Oh; Philip A Philip; Li-Tzong Chen; Thanyanan Reungwetwattana; Eric Van Cutsem; Kun-Huei Yeh; Kristen Ciombor; Richard S Finn; Anuradha Patel; Suman Sen; Dale Porter; Randi Isaacs; Andrew X Zhu; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Efficacy of BGJ398, a Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Inhibitor, in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma with FGFR3 Alterations.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Raanan Berger; David I Quinn; Matthew D Galsky; Juergen Wolf; Christian Dittrich; Bhumsuk Keam; Jean-Pierre Delord; Jan H M Schellens; Gwenaelle Gravis; Jacques Medioni; Pablo Maroto; Virote Sriuranpong; Chaiyut Charoentum; Howard A Burris; Viktor Grünwald; Daniel Petrylak; Ulka Vaishampayan; Eliahu Gez; Ugo De Giorgi; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jens Voortman; Sumati Gupta; Sunil Sharma; Amir Mortazavi; David J Vaughn; Randi Isaacs; Katie Parker; Xueying Chen; Kun Yu; Dale Porter; Diana Graus Porta; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 39.397

3.  Evaluation of BGJ398, a Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring Genetic Alterations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors: Results of a Global Phase I, Dose-Escalation and Dose-Expansion Study.

Authors:  Lucia Nogova; Lecia V Sequist; Jose Manuel Perez Garcia; Fabrice Andre; Jean-Pierre Delord; Manuel Hidalgo; Jan H M Schellens; Philippe A Cassier; D Ross Camidge; Martin Schuler; Ulka Vaishampayan; Howard Burris; G Gary Tian; Mario Campone; Zev A Wainberg; Wan-Teck Lim; Patricia LoRusso; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Katie Parker; Xueying Chen; Somesh Choudhury; Francois Ringeisen; Diana Graus-Porta; Dale Porter; Randi Isaacs; Reinhard Buettner; Jürgen Wolf
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Tyrosine kinase inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 functionally improves FGFR3-related dwarfism in mouse model.

Authors:  Davide Komla-Ebri; Emilie Dambroise; Ina Kramer; Catherine Benoist-Lasselin; Nabil Kaci; Cindy Le Gall; Ludovic Martin; Patricia Busca; Florent Barbault; Diana Graus-Porta; Arnold Munnich; Michaela Kneissel; Federico Di Rocco; Martin Biosse-Duplan; Laurence Legeai-Mallet
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Hyperphosphatemia Secondary to the Selective Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Inhibitor Infigratinib (BGJ398) Is Associated with Antitumor Efficacy in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3-altered Advanced/Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yung Lyou; Petros Grivas; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; David I Quinn; Daniel P Petrylak; Matthew Galsky; Ulka Vaishampayan; Ugo De Giorgi; Sumati Gupta; Howard Burris; Jessica Rearden; Ai Li; Hao Wang; Maribel Reyes; Susan Moran; Siamak Daneshmand; Dean Bajorin; Sumanta K Pal
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 20.096

  5 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  A year in pharmacology: new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2021.

Authors:  Gizem Kayki-Mutlu; Zinnet Sevval Aksoyalp; Leszek Wojnowski; Martin C Michel
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.195

Review 2.  New Halogen-Containing Drugs Approved by FDA in 2021: An Overview on Their Syntheses and Pharmaceutical Use.

Authors:  Davide Benedetto Tiz; Luana Bagnoli; Ornelio Rosati; Francesca Marini; Luca Sancineto; Claudio Santi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Targeted Therapies for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Simon Gray; Angela Lamarca; Julien Edeline; Heinz-Josef Klümpen; Richard A Hubner; Mairéad G McNamara; Juan W Valle
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  FDA-Approved Small Molecule Compounds as Drugs for Solid Cancers from Early 2011 to the End of 2021.

Authors:  Aleksandra Sochacka-Ćwikła; Marcin Mączyński; Andrzej Regiec
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Drug Repurposing, a Fast-Track Approach to Develop Effective Treatments for Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ioannis Ntafoulis; Stijn L W Koolen; Sieger Leenstra; Martine L M Lamfers
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 6.  Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End?

Authors:  Peter Ellinghaus; Daniel Neureiter; Hendrik Nogai; Sebastian Stintzing; Matthias Ocker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.666

7.  Effect of FGFR2 Alterations on Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Kristen Bibeau; Nikolaus Schultz; Amin Yaqubie; Brittanie Millang; Haobo Ren; Luis Féliz
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.864

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.