Literature DB >> 34279768

Advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging and aortic stenosis.

Carmen Cionca1,2, Alexandru Zlibut3, Lucia Agoston-Coldea4, Teodora Mocan1,5.   

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis has become the most common valvular heart disease on account of aging population and increasing life expectancy. Echocardiography is the primary diagnosis tool for this, but it still has many flaws. Therefore, advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging techniques are continuously being developed in order to overcome these limitations. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) allows a comprehensive morphological and functional evaluation of the aortic valve and provides important data for the diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with aortic stenosis. CMR can functionally assess the aortic flow using two-dimensional and time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded phase-contrast techniques. Furthermore, by late gadolinium enhancement and T1-mapping, CMR can reveal the presence of both irreversible replacement and diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis. Moreover, its role in guiding aortic valve replacement procedures is beginning to take shape. Recent studies have rendered the importance of active and passive biomechanics in risk stratification and prognosis prediction in patients with aortic stenosis, but more work is required is just in its infancy, but data are promising. In addition, cardiac computed tomography is particularly useful for the diagnosis of aortic valve stenosis, and in preprocedural evaluation of the aorta, while positron emission tomography can be also used to assess valvular inflammation and active calcification. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current available data regarding advanced cardiovascular multimodal imaging in aortic stenosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic stenosis; Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiac fibrosis; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34279768     DOI: 10.1007/s10741-021-10131-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Fail Rev        ISSN: 1382-4147            Impact factor:   4.214


  139 in total

Review 1.  How we perform cardiovascular magnetic resonance flow assessment using phase-contrast velocity mapping.

Authors:  Ping Chai; Raad Mohiaddin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

2.  Longitudinal myocardial shortening in aortic stenosis: ready for prime time after 30 years of research?

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Jean G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Anvesha Singh; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  The Role of Imaging of Flow Patterns by 4D Flow MRI in Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-02

5.  Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Thor Edvardsen; Steven Goldstein; Patrizio Lancellotti; Melissa LeFevre; Fletcher Miller; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Incremental prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Kenya Kusunose; Andrew Goodman; Roosha Parikh; Tyler Barr; Shikhar Agarwal; Zoran B Popovic; Richard A Grimm; Brian P Griffin; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Assessment of subendocardial contractile function in aortic stenosis: a study using speckle tracking echocardiography.

Authors:  Bas M van Dalen; Apostolos Tzikas; Osama I I Soliman; Helena J Heuvelman; Wim B Vletter; Folkert J Ten Cate; Marcel L Geleijnse
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 1.724

8.  Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample.

Authors:  M Lindroos; M Kupari; J Heikkilä; R Tilvis
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Lyes Kadem; Eric Larose; Marie-Annick Clavel; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Symptom Onset in Aortic Stenosis: Relation to Sex Differences in Left Ventricular Remodeling.

Authors:  Anvesha Singh; Daniel C S Chan; John P Greenwood; Dana K Dawson; Piotr Sonecki; Kai Hogrefe; Damian J Kelly; Vijay Dhakshinamurthy; Chim C Lang; Jeffery P Khoo; David Sprigings; Richard P Steeds; Ruiqi Zhang; Ian Ford; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Jing Yang; Zhuyin Li; Leong L Ng; Gerry P McCann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.