| Literature DB >> 34279476 |
Verena Veulemans1, Katharina Hellhammer2, Armin Borhan Azad1, Shouheng Goh1, Christian Drake1, Oliver Maier1, Kerstin Piayda1, Amin Polzin1, Arash Mehdiani3, Christian Jung1, Ralf Westenfeld1, Malte Kelm1,4, Artur Lichtenberg3, Tobias Zeus1.
Abstract
Transapical (TA) TAVR is known to be associated with increased mortality and vascular complications compared with transfemoral (TF) TAVR in high-risk and inoperable patients. However, safe alternative access methods remain crucial. We aimed to (1) evaluate the 30-day and 1-year outcomes comparing TA and TF TAVR in patients with an STS-PROM of <4% deemed inoperable and (2) determine dependent and independent predictors for all-cause one-year mortality. Data were collected from a single-center registry consisting of 340 eligible patients. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed (n = 50 TA, n = 50 TF). Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality, stroke, and major bleeding. Predictors for all-cause one-year mortality were evaluated. Thirty-day mortality (TF vs. TA: 0.0% vs. 4.0%; p = 0.153) was comparable in both cohorts. One-year all-cause mortality was twice as high in TA patients (TF vs. TA: 10.0% vs. 20.0%, p logrank = 0.165, HR 2.10). Cerebrovascular events and major bleeding during one-year follow-up were similar. The multivariate analysis identified hemoglobin <12 g/dL at admission and dual antiplatelet therapy as strong predictors for one-year mortality. Although femoral access is the primary access with favorable 30-day and 1-year results, transapical access was successful for patients unsuitable for TF TAVR, showing acceptable short- and mid-term results in inoperable patients with low-risk profiles.Entities:
Keywords: TAVI; TAVR; outcome; transapical; transfemoral
Year: 2021 PMID: 34279476 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132993
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241