| Literature DB >> 34279453 |
Elizabeth M Parker1, Edward A Bittner2, Lorenzo Berra2, Richard M Pino2,3.
Abstract
Hypoxemia of the acute respiratory distress syndrome can be reduced by turning patients prone. Prone positioning (PP) is labor intensive, risks unplanned tracheal extubation, and can result in facial tissue injury. We retrospectively examined prolonged, repeated, and early versus later PP for 20 patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure. Blood gases and ventilator settings were collected before PP, at 1, 7, 12, 24, 32, and 39 h after PP, and 7 h after completion of PP. Analysis of variance was used for comparisons with baseline values at supine positions before turning prone. PP for >39 h maintained PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratios when turned supine; the P/F decrease at 7 h was not significant from the initial values when turned supine. Patients turned prone a second time, when again turned supine at 7 h, had significant decreased P/F. When PP started for an initial P/F ≤ 150 versus P/F > 150, the P/F increased throughout the PP and upon return to supine. Our results show that a single turn prone for >39 h is efficacious and saves the burden of multiple prone turns, and there is no significant advantage to initiating PP when P/F > 150 compared to P/F ≤ 150.Entities:
Keywords: ARDS; COVID-19; PaO2/FIO2 ratio; acute respiratory distress syndrome; hypoxemia; prone positioning; respiratory failure
Year: 2021 PMID: 34279453 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241