Literature DB >> 34278543

Outcomes of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective study.

Luke J King1, Amanda J Young2, Preeyanka M Nagar1, Jamie L McDowell3, Ashlee L Smith1,4.   

Abstract

With advances in minimal invasive surgery, robotic surgery has become the widespread approach for surgical staging of endometrial cancer in the obese population. This study aimed to evaluate safety and surgical outcomes of robotic surgery in the morbidly obese and extremely morbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 391 obese women undergoing robotic-assisted surgical staging were identified and included in the study. Surgical outcomes for obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2) who underwent surgical staging between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively collected. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications were analyzed among the categories of obesity (BMI ≥ 30-34.9 kg/m2,  ≥ 35-39.9 kg/m2,  ≥ 40-49.9 kg/m2) including the extremely morbid obese (BMI  > 50 kg/m2). Comparative analysis revealed a higher percentage of postoperative complications with increasing BMI, although the results were not statistically significant. Postoperative complications are observed at higher rates among women with increasing BMI.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Endometrial; Obesity; Robotic surgery; Surgical complications

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34278543     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01277-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  6 in total

1.  Long-term survival of intermediate risk endometrial cancer (stage IG3, IC, II) treated with full lymphadenectomy and brachytherapy without teletherapy.

Authors:  J Fanning
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giorgia Gaia; Robert W Holloway; Luigi Santoro; Sarfraz Ahmad; Elena Di Silverio; Arsenio Spinillo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Akila Subramaniam; Kenneth H Kim; Shannon A Bryant; Bin Zhang; Christa Sikes; Kristopher J Kimball; Larry C Kilgore; Warner K Huh; John M Straughn; Ronald D Alvarez
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot.

Authors:  C Diaz-Arrastia; C Jurnalov; G Gomez; C Townsend
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?

Authors:  Leigh G Seamon; David E Cohn; Melissa S Henretta; Kenneth H Kim; Matthew J Carlson; Gary S Phillips; Jeffrey M Fowler
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-01-24       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Association between Obesity, Surgical Route, and Perioperative Outcomes in Patients with Uterine Cancer.

Authors:  Entidhar Al Sawah; Jason L Salemi; Mitchel Hoffman; Anthony N Imudia; Emad Mikhail
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-06-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.