James P Grace1, Ned B Bowden1. 1. Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, W425 Chemistry Building, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Abstract
Heterosubstituted disulfides are an understudied class of molecules that have been used in biological studies, but they have not been investigated for their ability to release hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The synthesis of two sets of chemicals with the diaminodisulfide (NSSN) and dialkoxydisulfide (OSSO) functional groups was reported. These chemicals were synthesized from commercially available sulfur monochloride or a simple disulfur transfer reagent. Both the diaminodisulfide and dialkoxydisulfide functional groups were found to have rapid rates of H2S release in the presence of excess thiol. The release of H2S was complete with 10 min, and the only byproducts were conversion of the thiols into disulfides and the amines or alcohols originally used in the synthesis of the diaminodisulfide or dialkoxydisulfide functional groups. These results will allow the design of H2S releasing chemicals that also release natural, biocompatible alcohols or amines. Chemicals with the diaminodisulfide and dialkoxydisulfide functional groups may find applications in medicine where a controlled, burst release of H2S is needed.
Heterosubstituted disulfides are an understudied class of molecules that have been used in biological studies, but they have not been investigated for their ability to release hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The synthesis of two sets of chemicals with the diaminodisulfide (NSSN) and dialkoxydisulfide (OSSO) functional groups was reported. These chemicals were synthesized from commercially available sulfur monochloride or a simple disulfur transfer reagent. Both the diaminodisulfide and dialkoxydisulfide functional groups were found to have rapid rates of H2S release in the presence of excess thiol. The release of H2S was complete with 10 min, and the only byproducts were conversion of the thiols into disulfides and the amines or alcohols originally used in the synthesis of the diaminodisulfide or dialkoxydisulfide functional groups. These results will allow the design of H2S releasing chemicals that also release natural, biocompatible alcohols or amines. Chemicals with the diaminodisulfide and dialkoxydisulfide functional groups may find applications in medicine where a controlled, burst release of H2S is needed.
Hydrogensulfide (H2S) is a noxious gas that is commonly
associated with potent toxicity at elevated concentrations (>100
ppm)
and adverse health effects at single ppm concentrations.[1−7] However, H2S has been found to be endogenously produced
in human and plant cells at nanomolar concentrations, and it is involved
in modulating numerous intra- and intercellular enzymatic cycles.[3,6,8−12] H2S is widely recognized as the third
gasotransmitter, along with nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, that
is important to human health.[13−19] H2S is mainly produced by the enzymatic cleavage of disulfides
and thiols from cysteine residues by cystathionine-β-synthase
and cystathionine-γ-lyase, but it has other endogenous sources
as well.[20,21] Physiological studies of H2S
include its use as a cardioprotectant against ischemia-reperfusion
injury, promoting angiogenesis, modulating hypoxic cell environments,
as a chemotherapeutic, and many more.[5,22−28] There has been a marked increase in publications in the last two
decades probing these benefits, yet many studies use the same handful
of H2S donors. Previous studies used aqueous solutions
of inorganic salts NaSH or Na2S, but due to the low boiling
point of −60 °C for H2S, aqueous solutions
of H2S rapidly release H2S into the atmosphere,
which led to rapidly changing concentrations of H2S and
impossible to sustain low therapeutic concentrations.[29] To address this challenge, chemicals such as GYY-4137 (2) or derivatives of 1,2-dithiole-3-thiones (DTT, 3) that slowly release H2S by hydrolysis were developed
(Figure ).[29−32] GYY-4137 and DTT release H2S immediately upon dissolving,
but in water, they release H2S at concentrations that are
105 times lower than the concentrations of these donors,
and the full release of H2S may take months.[29,33] This leads to the use of higher than desired concentrations of these
donors in cellular systems.
Figure 1
Several common H2S donors are shown
and classified by
their activation mechanisms.
Several common H2S donors are shown
and classified by
their activation mechanisms.The importance of H2S in many cellular pathways has
motivated the synthesis of numerous chemicals that release H2S in response to different stimuli. Investigators have developed
both nucleophilic and light-activated H2S releasing compounds,
although the latter is still relatively recent (Figure ).[4,34] Most nucleophile-triggered
H2S donors use thiols such as glutathione (GSH) and cysteine
which are found in μM to mM concentrations within the body.[26,34−38] Modeled after garlic-derived diallyl sulfides [i.e., DATS (4)], they produce a perthiol intermediate that
releases H2S after reaction with biological thiols.[26,37] In contrast to chemicals such as GYY-4137 that slowly release H2S upon hydrolysis, nucleophilic activated chemicals release
H2S rapidly.[26,34,36−38] The burst release of H2S is advantageous
in some biological systems such as for ischemia-reperfusion injury
treatment, following stressful cardiac events. In these studies, the
rapid release of H2S has been shown to modulate the reactive
oxygen species generated from reperfusion and minimize damage to the
heart.[23,39] A challenge with the current set of thiol-mediated
chemicals that release H2S is that their synthesis requires
several steps and results in the release of unnatural chemicals. In
this paper, we describe the synthesis of new chemicals that address
these challenges and further explores the reactions of two functional
groups understudied in organic chemistry.We report the synthesis
and H2S release of several water-soluble,
thiol-mediated, and burst release H2S donors based on the
functional groups diaminodisulfides and dialkoxydisulfides. These
functional groups are poorly studied in organic chemistry, although
there are reports of chemicals with these functional groups investigated
for their antibacterial properties.[40−42] Most applications of
diaminodisulfides are for use as vulcanizing agents because they break
down at elevated temperatures of >150 °C to release radicals.[43] Heterosubstituted disulfides (XSSX, X = R2N and RO) have not been reported to release H2S
yet stand to join the class of H2S donors. Water-soluble
versions of these heterosubstituted disulfides were synthesized to
investigate their release of H2S in aqueous systems with
current H2S sensing amperometry technology. Diversification
of the H2S donor library with these compounds opens new
applications and improves upon existing applications. The rate of
H2S release, solubility, conditions needed for H2S release, and the byproducts generated are all important considerations
when selecting a suitable donor.
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis of Chemicals
with OSSO and NSSN
Functional Groups
Chemicals with the OSSO functional group
have been described in the literature.[40,41,44−46] Their synthesis is typically
accomplished by reacting alcohols and sulfur monochloride (S2Cl2) in the presence of a base. In our work, we synthesized
diethoxy disulfide (10) and triethylene glycol monomethyl
ether disulfide (12) in yields of 80% and 83% yield,
respectively (Figure a,b). The products were purified using column chromatography on silica
gel. Although there is no previous report of compound 12 being synthesized in previous literature, the synthetic method employed
was known.
Synthesis of (a) diethoxy disulfide (organic soluble OSSO), (b)
triethylene glycol monomethyl ether disulfide (aqueous soluble OSSO),
morpholine disulfide (organic soluble OSSO), and diethanolamine disulfide
(aqueous soluble NSSN).Previous reports of the
synthesis of chemicals with the NSSN functional
group used either S2Cl2 or disulfide transfer
reagents such as 15 that we previously reported.[40,47−51] Morpholine disulfide (14) was synthesized in good yield
(86%) by treating morpholine with S2Cl2 and
NEt3 at −78 °C (Figure c). The reaction of S2Cl2 with diethanolamine resulted in numerous products due to the reaction
of alcohol and amine with S2Cl2, so a milder
disulfide transfer reagent was used. The reaction of diethanolamine
with disulfide transfer reagent (15) in DCM for 24 h
at room temperature resulted in a 91% yield of water-soluble NSSN
product 16 (Figure d). The byproducts were limited when 15 was used as the S2 transfer reagent because it was not
sensitive to attack by alcohols, yet it was reactive toward amines.
Stabilities of Chemicals in Organic Solvents
The stabilities of chemicals with the OSSO and NSSN functional
groups were investigated. Compound 16 was stable in CD3OD and DMSO-d6 with a variety
of different additives including acetic acid, dipropyl amine, hexanol,
benzamide, butyronitrile, and p-tolyl disulfide (Table S2). After 24 h, >90% of compound 16 was present in each of these experiments as shown by 1H NMR spectroscopy. After 24 h in D2O, 79% of 16 remained which demonstrated that it slowly decomposed in
D2O. Compound 10 was also stable in CDCl3, and no degradation was observed after 24 h in the presence
of acetic acid, hexanol, butyronitrile, benzamide, and p-tolyl disulfide (Table S3). Compound 10 slowly reacted with amines, in the presence of butylamine,
82% of 10 remained after 24 h, and in the presence of
dipropylamine, 77% remained after 24 h. Importantly, 12 was stable in CD3OD over 24 h with no evidence of degradation
observed.
Release of H2S Triggered by Thiols
The thiol-mediated H2S release of these compounds was
demonstrated by amperometry. The OSSO (12) and NSSN (16) compounds were studied at a low concentration (40 μM)
using a H2S microsensor coupled with a pH probe to monitor
any fluctuations in the pH of the solution (Figure ). pKa of H2S is 7.0, and pKa of HS– is reported as >10, so significant amounts of HS– can be present at the pH values used in this work. The total amount
of H2S and HS– released can be determined
by measuring the concentration of H2S and pH to allow the
concentration of HS– to be calculated. Solutions
of selected disulfides were made with bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) at varying
values of pH (5.5, 6.7, and 7.4). Bis-tris buffer was selected for
its desired pH range from 5.8 to 7.4 allowing us to test all pH values
with one buffer to limit variability. Compounds 12 and 16 were also tested for stability and H2S release
in phosphate-buffered solution (0.1 M, pH = 6.7) (Table S1 and Figure S1, respectively) and found similar H2S release profiles compared to the release in bis-tris buffer
at the same pH. The chemicals were added to the buffer and stirred
for 1 h to ensure that no H2S was released, and then, excess l-cysteine (l-Cys) (Figure a,b) or GSH (0.6 mM, 15 equiv.) (Figure c) was added. The
combined release of H2S and HS– was monitored
in a stirred, uncovered reaction vessel for 18 h. Neither l-Cys, GSH, nor disulfides in the absence of added thiol released
any detectable H2S. However, both 12 and 16 had a rapid release of H2S upon the addition
of excess l-Cys or GSH. These measurements were repeated
at a range of pH values in order to investigate the effect on H2S release. Notably, pH values for all experiments remained
within ±0.1 of the starting pH value for the duration of the
experiment.
Figure 3
Total sulfide release of (a) 12 (40 μM) and
(b) 16 (40 μM) in bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) at pH
= 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4. Cysteine (0.6 mM, 15 equiv.) was added after
1 h. (c) Total sulfide release of 16 (40 μM) in
bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) at pH = 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4 with the addition
of GSH (0.6 mM, 15 equiv) after 1 h.
Total sulfide release of (a) 12 (40 μM) and
(b) 16 (40 μM) in bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) at pH
= 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4. Cysteine (0.6 mM, 15 equiv.) was added after
1 h. (c) Total sulfide release of 16 (40 μM) in
bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) at pH = 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4 with the addition
of GSH (0.6 mM, 15 equiv) after 1 h.The release of H2S was most rapid and resulted in the
highest concentration of sulfide [(H2S) + (HS–)] at the lowest pH investigated for 12 and 16. For 12, at a pH of 5.5, the peak H2S concentration
occured 70 min after the addition of l-Cys, and the peak
concentration of sulfide [(H2S) + (HS–)] was 74 μM. At a pH of 6.7, these values were 80 min and
71 μM, and at a pH of 7.4, these values were 60 min and 58 μM.
Similar results were acquired with the NSSN chemical with sulfide
peaking times reported after the addition of cysteine (pH = 5.5, 90
min, 62 μM; pH = 6.7, 70 min, 47 μM; and pH = 7.4, 100
min, 31 μM). This data suggests that acidic water promotes a
more rapid sulfide release. The release of H2S is complex
and depends on the protonation of the starting materials and intermediates
and the nucleophilicity of thiols and perthiols that may be formed
during the reaction. A full understanding of why the pH has a slight
effect on the rate of release of H2S may be complex. To
provide some insights, a proposed mechanism of release of H2S will be described in this article. The peaking times of total sulfide
concentration are comparable to the time frames of other reported
thiol-activated H2S donors but release much higher quantities
of total sulfide at the same concentration of the starting material.Interestingly, the peak concentrations of sulfide for both 16 (62 μM) and 12 (74 μM) were greater
than that of the initial concentration of disulfides (40 μM).
This result demonstrated that the reaction between the NSSN and OSSO
chemicals with l-Cys was rapid and that both sulfur atoms
in OSSO and NSSN were released as H2S or HS–, not just one. Importantly, the intracellular concentration of free
thiols in the body is frequently reported in the range of 1–10
mM, which is significantly higher than the concentrations tested in
this study. Therefore, total sulfide peaking times may shorten with in vitro, studies which is a desirable property for a compound
designed to release H2S quickly.The release of H2S from 16 was investigated
with another intracellular thiol, GSH (15 equiv), to demonstrate the
effectiveness of a more ubiquitous and commonly tested intracellular
thiol (Figure c).
The reaction was completed in bis-tris buffer (0.1 M) with 16 at a concentration of 40 μM. The sulfide peaking times and
concentrations after the addition of GSH were measured at three different
pH values (pH = 5.5, 62 min, 26 μM; pH = 6.7, 65 min, 9.7 μM;
and pH = 7.4, 67 min, 4.7 μM). Notably, the peak sulfide concentrations
are lower with GSH than l-Cys. This is attributed to the
lower nucleophilicity of GSH. A quick release of sulfide was still
observed, and peaking times were still comparable, but a total sulfide
concentration decreased for a more tempered dosing application. The
exact intracellular conditions will need to be taken into account
when tailoring desired release in future biological studies.NMR studies were completed to investigate the products of reaction
with the OSSO and NSSN chemicals and a thiol (Figure ). However, l-Cys was not suitable
for this study to accurately determine the byproducts by NMR spectroscopy,
so 2-mercaptoethanol was chosen as a thiol substitute because of its
known 1H NMR values of predicted byproducts. Compound 16 was reacted in CH3OH with 15 equiv of 2-mercaptoethanol,
and the only products observed were diethanolamine and bis(2-hydroxyethyl)disulfide.
These products were isolated by column chromatography, and their identities
were confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectroscopy
(HRMS) analysis. Compound 10 was also reacted with 15
equiv of 2-mercaptoethanol in CD3OD, and the reaction was
followed by 1H NMR spectroscopy. The only products observed
were ethanol and bis(2-hydroxyethyl)disulfide. Both of these reactions
advanced to high conversions to yield only starting alcohols and amines
and disulfide of 2-mercaptoethanol by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
The reactions of the NSSN and OSSO chemicals with 2-mercaptoethanol
were too fast for the kinetics to be measured, but, based on the product
distribution, we propose the partial mechanisms, as shown in Figures and S2 and S3. Importantly, these studies confirm
that the byproducts of the reactions were parent alcohol or amine
and disulfide of the chosen thiol.
Figure 4
Partial mechanism for the proposed reaction
of 16 and 10 with generic thiol (RSH) to release H2S.
Partial mechanism for the proposed reaction
of 16 and 10 with generic thiol (RSH) to release H2S.
Mechanism of the Release of H2S
The HRMS studies were completed to investigate the presence of
intermediates of the reaction between 16 and N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). These reactions were completed
with an excess of NAC (2×, 5×, and 10×) and with N-ethyl maleimide (1 equiv) in MeOH to generate and trap
intermediates. At time points of 5 min, 20 min, 75 min, 2.5 h, and
24 h, a sample of the reaction was added to a HRMS instrument to investigate
which intermediates were present (Figures S4–S20). N-Ethyl maleimide was added because it is known
to trap perthiols and other reactive thiols, but, unfortunately, no
perthiols were trapped with N-ethyl maleimide, it
was only found to react with NAC. The spectra confirmed the presence
of the final products in addition to the presence of trisulfide and
tetrasulfide of NAC and NAC–DEA–trisulfide (Figure ) in all three experiments.
The tri- and tetrasulfides of NAC were predicted as possible intermediates
(Figures S2 and S3), and these chemicals
were expected because H2S in the presence of disulfides
yields polysulfides through equilibrium reactions.
Figure 5
Structures of three of
the chemicals found by HRMS in reactions
between 16 and NAC.
Structures of three of
the chemicals found by HRMS in reactions
between 16 and NAC.
Conclusions
In conclusion, heterosubstituted
disulfides are a synthetically
facile and stable class of thiol-dependent H2S releasing
compounds that have rapid release profiles measured in minutes compared
to the release of H2S from chemicals such as GYY-4137 which
takes months in water at room temperature to fully degrade.[29,33] A key advantage of these chemicals is that they release amines and
alcohols that were used in their synthesis simplifying the byproduct
prediction. By using drugs or biocompatible chemicals with amines
or alcohols, the degradation products can be designed to deliver H2S and either a pharmaceutical drug or another natural chemical
that is known to be safe in vivo. A second key advantage
of these chemicals is that when synthesized as a prodrug using an
amine or alcohol on the drug, these chemicals will release H2S and the drug within minutes from each other to ensure that both
are released in the same part of the body at the same time. We envision
that chemicals with these functional groups can provide controllable,
burst release of H2S in vivo at predictable
dosages for therapeutic purposes such as for ischemia-reperfusion
injury treatment, following stressful cardiac events where H2S must be delivered in minutes to prevent damage to the heart. Additionally,
fast-releasing H2S donors have the potential as chemotherapeutics
due to their cytotoxicity at elevated concentrations. A diversity
in H2S releasing organic chemicals is essential to explore
the pathological and physiological applications for H2S,
and our compounds possess both a notably fast and complete release
of H2S along with predictable and safe byproducts.
Experimental Section
Materials and Supplies
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on AVANCE
300 MHz
and 75 MHz NMR instruments, respectively. Column chromatography was
performed using SilicaFlash F60 silica gel (230–400 Mesh).
HRMS was conducted on Waters Q-Tof Premier. The H2S release
was measured using an AMT Analysenmesstechnik amperometric H2S microsensor (type III). Phthalimide, cis-1,2,3,6-tetrahydrophthalimide,
triethylamine, ethanol, diethanolamine, morpholine, and triethylene
glycol were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or Acros Organics and were
used as received. Hydrogen gas was purchased from PraxAir. S2Cl2 was purchased from Aldrich, purified by vacuum distillation
over elemental sulfur and charcoal, and stored under N2. All solvents were of reagent grade and purchased from Acros Organics
or Sigma-Aldrich. All yields reported are isolated yields unless reported
otherwise.
Diethoxy disulfide (10)
A solution of triethylamine (2.53 g, 25.0 mmol)
and ethanol (1.16
g, 25.1 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was cooled to
0 °C for 20 min. S2Cl2 (1.69 g, 12.5 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added dropwise to the
reaction for 16 min and was stirred at 0 °C for 1 h. The reaction
was quenched with water, washed with 2 × 50 mL portions of water,
and washed once with 50 mL of saturated NaCl. The organic layer was
dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give an orange
oil. The product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel,
eluting with 5% ethyl acetate in hexanes to yield a light yellow oil
(1.53 g, 80%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.29
(t, 6H), 3.84 (m, 2H), 3.98 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 15.55, 71.06. HRMS: (M + Na) calcd for C4H10O2S2, 154.0122; found, 154.0134.
A solution of triethylamine (2.53 g, 24.9
mmol) and triethylene glycol monomethyl ether (4.11 g, 25.0 mmol)
in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) was cooled to 0 °C for
20 min. S2Cl2 (1.69 g, 12.5 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction
for 10 min and was continuously stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and at
room temperature for an additional hour. The reaction was quenched
with water and washed with an additional 2 × 50 mL portions of
water and then saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried
over anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give an orange
oil. The product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel,
eluting with 5% MeOH solution in DCM to yield a dark yellow oil (4.04
g, 83%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 3.38 (s, 6H),
3.55 (m, 4H), 3.66 (m, 12H), 3.70 (m, 4H), 3.94 (m, 2H), 4.08 (m,
2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 59.01, 70.02,
70.58, 70.60, 70.62, 70.72, 71.96, 74.38. HRMS: (M + Na) calcd for
C14H30O8S2Na, 413.1280;
found, 413.1284.
We followed a procedure previously described
in the literature.[1] A solution of triethylamine
(5.12 g, 50.5 mmol) and cis-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydrophthalimide
(7.05 g, 46.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was cooled
to −90 °C in an acetone/N2(l) bath. S2Cl2 (3.11 g, 23.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction for 12 min and was stirred
at −90 °C for 30 min. The reaction was quenched with ice
cold water and washed with 4 × 50 mL portions of NaOH solution
(0.2 M) and saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried over
anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give a brown solid.
The product was purified by recrystallization by dissolving in minimal
boiling ethyl acetate and precipitating with boiling hexanes (2.278
g, 27%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 1.49 (m, 4H),
1.88 (m, 4H), 2.98 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3):
δ 21.85, 22.26, 24.12, 40.83, 177.65.
Bis(diethanolamine)disulfide
(16)
Bis(cis-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexahydrophthalimide)disulfide
(2.80 g, 7.59 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) was added
to a solution of diethanolamine (2.80 g, 7.6 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (25 mL) at room temperature and stirred for 24 h.
A white solid was collected without further purification (0.94 g,
91%). 1H NMR (CD3OD): δ 2.99 (t, 4H),
3.72 (t, 4H). 13C NMR (CD3OD): δ 60.56,
61.46. HRMS: (M + Na) calcd for C4H10N2O4S2Na, 295.0762; found, 295.0758.
Dimorpholine disulfide (14)
A solution
of triethylamine (2.23 g, 22.1 mmol) and morpholine
(1.76 g, 20.2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (100 mL) was cooled
to −90 °C in an acetone/N2 bath. S2Cl2 (1.35 g, 10.0 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added dropwise to the reaction for 8 min and was stirred
at −90 °C for 30 min. The reaction was quenched with ice
cold water and washed with 2 × 20 mL portions of NaOH solution
(0.2 M) and saturated NaCl solution. The organic layer was dried over
anhydrous magnesium sulfate and evaporated to give a brown solid.
The product was purified by recrystallization by dissolving in minimal
boiling ethyl acetate and precipitating with boiling hexanes (2.03
g, 86%). The NMR spectra of this chemical matched that of a previous
report.[2]1H NMR (CDCl3): δ 2.83 (t, 4H), 3.74 (t, 4H). 13C NMR (CDCl3): δ 55.8, 67.3.
Amperometry
Experiments for the Detection
of Thiol-Mediated H2S Release
Preparation of buffer:
a solution of 2-(bis(2-hydroxyethyl)imino)-2(hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol)
(20.93 g, 0.1 mol) in water (750 mL) was prepared. HCl was added dropwise
while stirring until the desired pH was achieved (5.5, 6.7, and 7.4).
The buffer was transferred to a 1 L volumetric flask and diluted to
1 L. The buffer was used in H2S detection experiments without
further modification.A stock solution of diethanolamine disulfide
(27.2 mg, 0.1 mmol) in water (10 mL) was prepared. A portion of the
diethanolamine disulfide stock solution (0.30 mL) was diluted in 0.1
M bis-tris buffer (75 mL, 40 μM, pH = 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4) in
a 100 mL jar equipped with a stir bar. The concentration of total
sulfide (H2S + HS–) was recorded for
1 h while stirring, and then, a stock solution of l-Cys (0.56
mL of 80 mM stock solution) was added to yield a final concentration
of l-Cys of 0.60 mM (15 equiv to diethanolamine disulfide).
The concentration of total sulfide (H2S + HS–) was recorded for an additional 17 h.A stock solution of
triethylene glycol monomethyl ether disulfide
(TEG-DS) (39.0 mg, 0.1 mmol) in water (10 mL) was prepared. A portion
of the TEG-DS stock solution (0.30 mL) was diluted in 0.1 M bis-tris
buffer (75 mL, 40 μM, pH = 5.5, 6.7, and 7.4) in a 100 mL jar
equipped with a stir bar. The concentration of total sulfide (H2S + HS–) was recorded for 1 h while stirring,
and then, a stock solution of l-Cys (0.56 mL of 80 mM stock
solution) was added to yield a final concentration of l-Cys
of 0.60 mM (15 equiv to TEG-DS). The concentration of total sulfide
(H2S + HS–) was recorded for an additional
17 h.
Authors: Neel R Sodha; Richard T Clements; Jun Feng; Yuhong Liu; Cesario Bianchi; Eszter M Horvath; Csaba Szabo; Gregory L Stahl; Frank W Sellke Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2009-06-13 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Nathan L Whitfield; Edward L Kreimier; Francys C Verdial; Nini Skovgaard; Kenneth R Olson Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2008-04-16 Impact factor: 3.619