Literature DB >> 34278061

Gonadal vein as a bypass conduit for arterial reconstruction during an aortic debranching repair of a paravisceral aortic aneurysm.

Tyler D Yan1, Sally H J Choi2, Jerry C Chen2.   

Abstract

We report a case of a hybrid aortic debranching procedure for repair of a paravisceral inflammatory aortic aneurysm. Vein grafts were chosen over prosthetics because of concern for infection as a possible etiology. The gonadal vein was successfully used as a vein graft between the right common iliac artery and the right renal artery before aortic endograft placement.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic debranching; Gonadal vein; Ovarian vein; Vascular grafting; Visceral reconstruction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34278061      PMCID: PMC8261553          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech        ISSN: 2468-4287


Aortic debranching is an important option in the therapeutic arsenal for thoracoabdominal or paravisceral aortic aneurysms considered high risk for open repair and unsuitable for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)., First described in 1999, this technique involves aortic debranching and retrograde perfusion of the visceral and renal vessels, followed by endovascular repair and aneurysmal exclusion. Prosthetic grafts and the greater saphenous vein (GSV) are the most commonly used bypass conduits. We report a case of a patient debranched and the gonadal vein used as part of the hybrid repair of a paravisceral aortic aneurysm. Patient consent was obtained for this case report.

Case presentation

A 61-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with a 3-day worsening of abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and malaise. Seven months prior, she was diagnosed with abdominal aortitis with a 3.7 cm pararenal aortic inflammatory aneurysm thought to be secondary to large vessel vasculitis after presenting with chronic back pain, 20-pound weight loss and elevated C-reactive protein at 51 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 120. Her previous workup did not suggest an infectious etiology (negative blood cultures, syphilis serology, interferon-gamma release assay, hepatitis B/C serology, and human immunodeficiency virus screening assay), and she was medically managed with prednisone, methotrexate, and serial imaging follow-up. Computed tomography angiography revealed rapid aneurysmal expansion from 4.2 to 6.2 cm over the last month. There was worsening circumferential thickening and cephalad extension up to the level of the diaphragm spanning T11-L3. The celiac and superior mesenteric artery origins were occluded within the inflammatory process (Fig 1), with a patent modest sized inferior mesenteric artery retrogradely supplying the mesenteric circulation. The patient was admitted for urgent repair. Her blood and urine culture unexpectedly grew Klebsiella pneumoniae 24 hours after admission. This introduced the possibility of an infected aneurysm. We decided to treat her with a staged hybrid EVAR with autogenous vein debranching.
Fig 1

Sagittal reconstruction of the computed tomography angiogram before the endovascular aneurysm repair procedure showing the occlusions of the proximal celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Please note the inflammatory aortic rind indicated by the white arrows. The yellow arrow indicates the reconstituted celiac artery bifurcation, and the red arrow indicates the reconstituted SMA.

Sagittal reconstruction of the computed tomography angiogram before the endovascular aneurysm repair procedure showing the occlusions of the proximal celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Please note the inflammatory aortic rind indicated by the white arrows. The yellow arrow indicates the reconstituted celiac artery bifurcation, and the red arrow indicates the reconstituted SMA. An abdominal aorta debranching was performed. The left GSV was harvested from the thigh and used as a conduit between the left common iliac artery (CIA) and the left renal artery, and left CIA and inferior mesenteric artery. An adequate length of the GSV was used for an end-to-side anastomosis from the left renal artery bypass to the superior mesenteric artery. The left GSV distal to the knee and the right GSV were found to be of poor quality and not used. During laparotomy, a sizeable right gonadal vein was identified that appeared suitable as a conduit. It was harvested from the inferior vena cava to the level of the ovaries. The right gonadal vein was anastomosed to the right CIA and subsequently end-to-end to the right renal artery (Fig 2). A jump graft to the common hepatic artery was created using the residual segment of the harvested GSV. All distal bypasses demonstrated good Doppler signals at the end of the case.
Fig 2

Intraoperative photograph of the ovarian vein bypass. The yellow bracket indicates the aorto-right renal bypass using the ovarian vein. The blue bracket indicates the graft to the hepatic artery using the saphenous vein. The white arrow indicates the right renal anastomoses. The blue arrow indicates the end-to-side anastomoses of the saphenous and the ovarian vein. The green arrow indicates the hepatic anastomoses.

Intraoperative photograph of the ovarian vein bypass. The yellow bracket indicates the aorto-right renal bypass using the ovarian vein. The blue bracket indicates the graft to the hepatic artery using the saphenous vein. The white arrow indicates the right renal anastomoses. The blue arrow indicates the end-to-side anastomoses of the saphenous and the ovarian vein. The green arrow indicates the hepatic anastomoses. Six days after debranching, an EVAR was performed with no complications (Fig 3). Four days later, the patient was taken back for a relook laparotomy for bleeding. Intraoperatively, a slow trickle from one anastomosis was found and reinforced with a 6-0 Prolene suture. All grafts were patent. She remained clinically stable and was discharged on high-dose prednisone with regular follow-up by rheumatology and vascular surgery. A computed tomography angiography at 2 months showed a widely patent right renal bypass and appreciable decrease in the degree of aortitis with the endograft (Fig 4).
Fig 3

Intraoperative angiogram taken at the end of the endovascular aneurysm repair procedure. The endograft is shown as well as the bypasses extending from the common iliac arteries bilaterally.

Fig 4

Computed tomography imaging at 2-month follow-up. The white arrow indicates the right renal bypass that remained patent.

Intraoperative angiogram taken at the end of the endovascular aneurysm repair procedure. The endograft is shown as well as the bypasses extending from the common iliac arteries bilaterally. Computed tomography imaging at 2-month follow-up. The white arrow indicates the right renal bypass that remained patent.

Discussion

The debranching repair of suprarenal aortic aneurysms avoids cross-clamping, reduces visceral and renal ischemic times, and allows for broad applicability to a range of patient anatomy. Prosthetic conduits are most commonly used, and there are commercially available Dacron grafts designed specifically for this use., Alternatively, autologous veins may be used for situations where risk of infection is a concern. In a study of 40 patients undergoing total visceral and renal revascularization, synthetic grafts were used in all but one case that used the saphenous vein. This case is a patient with a rapidly expanding paravisceral aortic aneurysm, in whom we avoided prosthetic grafts due to their higher infection risk. Instead, we used autologous veins, one of them being the right gonadal vein for the right renal bypass. Although the initial plan was to use the GSV exclusively, we ran out of GSV, and the gonadal vein appeared robust and suitable in size. Cadaveric cryopreserved conduit would have been a suitable option but could not be obtained at our institution on such short notice. We decided to debranch with autogenous conduits and treat the aneurysm with an aortic endograft because we felt that the aortitis was most likely autoimmune rather than of infectious etiology. We felt that the endograft was the best option as it most likely will deal with the aortitis and does not jeopardize future management options. If the patient is to develop ongoing infection from the aorta after the endograft, we can treat the patient with explant, aortic excision, and in situ repair with the neoaortoiliac system, or cadaveric cryopreserved conduit, or extra-anatomical repair with axillofemoral bypasses. The debranching autogenous bypasses would serve this patient well in such a scenario by averting the need for further visceral revascularization. Using the gonadal vein as an arterial graft is uncommon and only exists in the transplantation literature. There are seven reports of its use in hepatic and renal artery reconstruction with no vascular complications in the short term and one case reporting a follow-up of up to 3 years.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 We did not find any previous cases of the gonadal vein being used as a bypass conduit for aortic debranching. A benefit to using the gonadal vein for this indication includes avoiding an additional incision at another body site and the rare but potentially major leg wound complications associated with GSV harvesting. The safety of removing the gonadal vein has been documented in the treatment of pelvic congestion syndrome with some studies reporting 8-year follow-up with minimal rates of complications. A more recent study of 28 patients who underwent endoscopic gonadal vein resection similarly reported minimal complications. Embolization of the gonadal vein is a well-tolerated treatment of varicocele in males and pelvic congestion syndrome in females, with complications occurring in 3% to 10% and largely related to the procedure itself such as recurrence of varices or nontarget embolization., In the setting of kidney transplantations, gonadal vein resection does not impact the frequency of ureteral complications. Given the safety demonstrated in these studies, we wonder if the gonadal vein may be a good source of vein conduit for patients who need intra-abdominal vascular procedures. A drawback to using vein grafts for visceral bypass is the concern of aneurysmal degeneration. In two studies reporting on more than 200 aortorenal vein grafts, the rate of aneurysmal degeneration was 5% to 6%., Similarly, saphenous vein graft aneurysms are a documented concern among peripheral arterial reconstruction and coronary artery bypass grafting procedures., Although there are limited data specifically on the gonadal vein, the inferred risk of aneurysmal degeneration must be considered, but there are insufficient data to compare this risk with that of other vein conduits.

Conclusions

The gonadal vein is a potentially good conduit for visceral arterial reconstruction as an alternative to prosthetic and GSV grafts, particularly in cases of suspected infection or when leg veins are not ideal. Further study is needed to determine its long-term patency and safety.
  23 in total

1.  Use of gonadal vein interposition graft for implantation of polar artery in live donor renal transplantation.

Authors:  Nikolaos A Chatzizacharias; Anand S R Muthusami; Mark Sullivan; Sanjay Sinha; Jens Brockmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Visceral reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Sunita D Srivastava
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Fate of 100 aortorenal vein grafts: characteristics of late graft expansion, aneurysmal dilatation, and stenosis.

Authors:  J C Stanley; C B Ernst; W J Fry
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Successful Elongation of a Short Graft Renal Artery by a Gonadal Vein.

Authors:  Erdal Uysal; M Fatih Yuzbasioglu; Mehmet A Ikidag; Mehmet Dokur; O Ahmet Gurer
Journal:  Exp Clin Transplant       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 0.945

5.  Repair of type IV thoracoabdominal aneurysm with a combined endovascular and surgical approach.

Authors:  W J Quiñones-Baldrich; T F Panetta; C L Vescera; V S Kashyap
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Gonadal vein embolization: treatment of varicocele and pelvic congestion syndrome.

Authors:  Mark A Bittles; Eric K Hoffer
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  Treatment of pelvic varicosities causing lower abdominal pain with extraperitoneal resection of the left ovarian vein.

Authors:  E Rundqvist; L E Sandholm; G Larsson
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1984

Review 8.  A novel technique for reconstruction of multiple renal arteries in live donor kidney transplantation: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  B He; A Mitchell
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Arterial reconstruction using the donor's gonadal vein in living renal transplantation with multiple renal arteries: a case report and a literature review.

Authors:  Mitsuru Tomizawa; Shunta Hori; Nobutaka Nishimura; Chihiro Omori; Yasushi Nakai; Makito Miyake; Tatsuo Yoneda; Kiyohide Fujimoto
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Hepatic artery reconstruction with gonodal vein interposition: First case in patients receiving liver from the living donor.

Authors:  Ayhan Dinckan; Alihan Gurkan; Omer Ozkan; Bulent Dinc; Yucel Yuksel; Nedim Akgul; Mustafa Saracoglu; Taner Colak
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.